Comparison of certainty of evidence between the net benefit approach and the traditional GRADE method using the data of Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020.

IF 3.8 2区医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE

Journal of Intensive Care Pub Date : 2023-07-17 DOI:10.1186/s40560-023-00680-5

Takero Terayama, Hiromu Okano, Sadatoshi Kawakami, Kenichi Kano, Masaaki Sakuraya, Yoshitaka Aoki

引用次数: 0

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

使用日本《败血症和感染性休克管理临床实践指南2020》的数据比较净获益法和传统GRADE法的证据确定性

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

CiteScore

11.90

自引率

1.40%

发文量

审稿时长

15 weeks

期刊介绍： "Journal of Intensive Care" is an open access journal dedicated to the comprehensive coverage of intensive care medicine, providing a platform for the latest research and clinical insights in this critical field. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including intensive and critical care, trauma and surgical intensive care, pediatric intensive care, acute and emergency medicine, perioperative medicine, resuscitation, infection control, and organ dysfunction. Recognizing the importance of cultural diversity in healthcare practices, "Journal of Intensive Care" also encourages submissions that explore and discuss the cultural aspects of intensive care, aiming to promote a more inclusive and culturally sensitive approach to patient care. By fostering a global exchange of knowledge and expertise, the journal contributes to the continuous improvement of intensive care practices worldwide.