Diagnostic accuracy of a rapid nucleic acid test for group A streptococcal pharyngitis using saliva samples: protocol for a prospective multicenter study in primary care.
Robert Touitou, Philippe Bidet, Constance Dubois, Henri Partouche, Stéphane Bonacorsi, Camille Jung, Robert Cohen, Corinne Levy, Jérémie F Cohen
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of a rapid nucleic acid test for group A streptococcal pharyngitis using saliva samples: protocol for a prospective multicenter study in primary care.","authors":"Robert Touitou, Philippe Bidet, Constance Dubois, Henri Partouche, Stéphane Bonacorsi, Camille Jung, Robert Cohen, Corinne Levy, Jérémie F Cohen","doi":"10.1186/s41512-023-00150-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Group A streptococcus is found in 20-40% of cases of childhood pharyngitis; the remaining cases are viral. Streptococcal pharyngitis (\"strep throat\") is usually treated with antibiotics, while these are not indicated in viral cases. Most guidelines recommend relying on a diagnostic test confirming the presence of group A streptococcus before prescribing antibiotics. Conventional first-line tests are rapid antigen detection tests based on throat swabs. Recently, rapid nucleic acid tests were developed; they allow the detection of elements of the genome of group A streptococcus. We hypothesize that these rapid nucleic acid tests are sensitive enough to be performed on saliva samples instead of throat swabs, which could be more convenient in practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a multicenter, prospective diagnostic accuracy study evaluating the performance of a rapid nucleic acid test for group A streptococcus (Abbott ID NOW STREP A2) in saliva, compared with a conventional pharyngeal rapid antigen detection test (EXACTO PRO STREPTATEST, lateral flow assay, comparator test), with a composite reference standard of throat culture and group A streptococcus PCR in children with pharyngitis in primary care (i.e., 27 primary care pediatricians or general practitioners). To ensure group A streptococcus is not missed, the salivary rapid nucleic acid test requires a minimally acceptable value of sensitivity (primary outcome) set at 80%. Assuming 35% of participants will have group A streptococcus, we will recruit 800 consecutive children with pharyngitis. Secondary outcomes will include difference in sensitivity between the pharyngeal rapid antigen detection test and the salivary rapid nucleic acid test; variability in sensitivity and specificity of the salivary rapid nucleic acid test with the level of McIsaac score; time to obtain the result of the salivary rapid nucleic acid test; patient, physician, and parents satisfaction; and barriers and facilitators to using rapid tests for group A streptococcus in primary care.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Approved by the Institutional Review Board \"Comité de protection des personnes Ile de France I\" (no. 2022-A00085-38). Results will be presented at international meetings and disseminated in peer-reviewed journals.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05521568.</p>","PeriodicalId":72800,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and prognostic research","volume":"7 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10347703/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and prognostic research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-023-00150-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Group A streptococcus is found in 20-40% of cases of childhood pharyngitis; the remaining cases are viral. Streptococcal pharyngitis ("strep throat") is usually treated with antibiotics, while these are not indicated in viral cases. Most guidelines recommend relying on a diagnostic test confirming the presence of group A streptococcus before prescribing antibiotics. Conventional first-line tests are rapid antigen detection tests based on throat swabs. Recently, rapid nucleic acid tests were developed; they allow the detection of elements of the genome of group A streptococcus. We hypothesize that these rapid nucleic acid tests are sensitive enough to be performed on saliva samples instead of throat swabs, which could be more convenient in practice.
Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective diagnostic accuracy study evaluating the performance of a rapid nucleic acid test for group A streptococcus (Abbott ID NOW STREP A2) in saliva, compared with a conventional pharyngeal rapid antigen detection test (EXACTO PRO STREPTATEST, lateral flow assay, comparator test), with a composite reference standard of throat culture and group A streptococcus PCR in children with pharyngitis in primary care (i.e., 27 primary care pediatricians or general practitioners). To ensure group A streptococcus is not missed, the salivary rapid nucleic acid test requires a minimally acceptable value of sensitivity (primary outcome) set at 80%. Assuming 35% of participants will have group A streptococcus, we will recruit 800 consecutive children with pharyngitis. Secondary outcomes will include difference in sensitivity between the pharyngeal rapid antigen detection test and the salivary rapid nucleic acid test; variability in sensitivity and specificity of the salivary rapid nucleic acid test with the level of McIsaac score; time to obtain the result of the salivary rapid nucleic acid test; patient, physician, and parents satisfaction; and barriers and facilitators to using rapid tests for group A streptococcus in primary care.
Ethics and dissemination: Approved by the Institutional Review Board "Comité de protection des personnes Ile de France I" (no. 2022-A00085-38). Results will be presented at international meetings and disseminated in peer-reviewed journals.
背景:在 20-40% 的儿童咽炎病例中发现有 A 组链球菌,其余病例则为病毒性咽炎。链球菌性咽炎("链球菌性咽喉炎")通常使用抗生素治疗,而病毒性咽炎则不使用抗生素。大多数指南建议,在开具抗生素处方之前,应先进行诊断性检测,确认是否存在 A 组链球菌。传统的一线检测是基于咽拭子的快速抗原检测。最近,又开发出了快速核酸检测法;这种检测法可以检测到 A 组链球菌基因组的元素。我们假设,这些快速核酸检测的灵敏度足以取代咽拭子,在唾液样本中进行检测,这在实践中可能更方便:这是一项多中心、前瞻性诊断准确性研究,目的是评估唾液中 A 组链球菌快速核酸检测试剂盒(雅培 ID NOW STREP A2)与传统的咽部快速抗原检测试剂盒(EXACTO PRO STREPTATEST,横向流检测试剂盒,比较试剂盒)的性能,并将咽培养和 A 组链球菌 PCR 作为基层医疗机构咽炎患儿(即 27 名基层儿科医生或全科医生)的综合参考标准。为确保不漏检 A 组链球菌,唾液快速核酸检测的灵敏度(主要结果)要求达到 80% 的最低可接受值。假设 35% 的参与者会感染 A 组链球菌,我们将连续招募 800 名咽炎患儿。次要结果将包括:咽部快速抗原检测试验与唾液快速核酸试验的灵敏度差异;唾液快速核酸试验的灵敏度和特异性随 McIsaac 评分水平的变化;获得唾液快速核酸试验结果的时间;患者、医生和家长的满意度;以及在初级保健中使用 A 组链球菌快速试验的障碍和促进因素:伦理与传播:已获机构审查委员会 "Comité de protection des personnes Ile de France I "批准(编号:2022-A00085-38)。试验结果将在国际会议上公布,并在同行评审期刊上发表:试验注册号:ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT05521568.