Relaxing parametric assumptions for non-linear Mendelian randomization using a doubly-ranked stratification method.

IF 4.5 2区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
PLoS Genetics Pub Date : 2023-06-30 eCollection Date: 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.1010823
Haodong Tian, Amy M Mason, Cunhao Liu, Stephen Burgess
{"title":"Relaxing parametric assumptions for non-linear Mendelian randomization using a doubly-ranked stratification method.","authors":"Haodong Tian, Amy M Mason, Cunhao Liu, Stephen Burgess","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgen.1010823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-linear Mendelian randomization is an extension to standard Mendelian randomization to explore the shape of the causal relationship between an exposure and outcome using an instrumental variable. A stratification approach to non-linear Mendelian randomization divides the population into strata and calculates separate instrumental variable estimates in each stratum. However, the standard implementation of stratification, referred to as the residual method, relies on strong parametric assumptions of linearity and homogeneity between the instrument and the exposure to form the strata. If these stratification assumptions are violated, the instrumental variable assumptions may be violated in the strata even if they are satisfied in the population, resulting in misleading estimates. We propose a new stratification method, referred to as the doubly-ranked method, that does not require strict parametric assumptions to create strata with different average levels of the exposure such that the instrumental variable assumptions are satisfied within the strata. Our simulation study indicates that the doubly-ranked method can obtain unbiased stratum-specific estimates and appropriate coverage rates even when the effect of the instrument on the exposure is non-linear or heterogeneous. Moreover, it can also provide unbiased estimates when the exposure is coarsened (that is, rounded, binned into categories, or truncated), a scenario that is common in applied practice and leads to substantial bias in the residual method. We applied the proposed doubly-ranked method to investigate the effect of alcohol intake on systolic blood pressure, and found evidence of a positive effect of alcohol intake, particularly at higher levels of alcohol consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":20266,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Genetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10343089/pdf/","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1010823","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Non-linear Mendelian randomization is an extension to standard Mendelian randomization to explore the shape of the causal relationship between an exposure and outcome using an instrumental variable. A stratification approach to non-linear Mendelian randomization divides the population into strata and calculates separate instrumental variable estimates in each stratum. However, the standard implementation of stratification, referred to as the residual method, relies on strong parametric assumptions of linearity and homogeneity between the instrument and the exposure to form the strata. If these stratification assumptions are violated, the instrumental variable assumptions may be violated in the strata even if they are satisfied in the population, resulting in misleading estimates. We propose a new stratification method, referred to as the doubly-ranked method, that does not require strict parametric assumptions to create strata with different average levels of the exposure such that the instrumental variable assumptions are satisfied within the strata. Our simulation study indicates that the doubly-ranked method can obtain unbiased stratum-specific estimates and appropriate coverage rates even when the effect of the instrument on the exposure is non-linear or heterogeneous. Moreover, it can also provide unbiased estimates when the exposure is coarsened (that is, rounded, binned into categories, or truncated), a scenario that is common in applied practice and leads to substantial bias in the residual method. We applied the proposed doubly-ranked method to investigate the effect of alcohol intake on systolic blood pressure, and found evidence of a positive effect of alcohol intake, particularly at higher levels of alcohol consumption.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用双排序分层法放宽非线性孟德尔随机化的参数假设。
非线性孟德尔随机法是对标准孟德尔随机法的扩展,利用工具变量探索暴露与结果之间因果关系的形态。非线性孟德尔随机法的分层方法是将人群划分为若干层,并在每个层中计算单独的工具变量估计值。然而,分层的标准实施方法,即残差法,依赖于工具和暴露之间线性和同质性的强参数假设来形成分层。如果违反这些分层假设,即使在总体中满足工具变量假设,在分层中也可能违反工具变量假设,从而导致误导性估计。我们提出了一种新的分层方法,称为双重排序法,它不需要严格的参数假设,就能建立具有不同平均暴露水平的分层,从而在分层内满足工具变量假设。我们的模拟研究表明,即使工具对暴露的影响是非线性或异质性的,双排序法也能获得无偏的分层估计值和适当的覆盖率。此外,当暴露量被粗略化(即四舍五入、分门别类或截断)时,它也能提供无偏的估计值,这种情况在应用实践中很常见,会导致残差法产生很大偏差。我们应用所提出的双重排序法研究了酒精摄入量对收缩压的影响,发现有证据表明酒精摄入量有积极影响,尤其是在酒精摄入量较高的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Genetics
PLoS Genetics 生物-遗传学
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
2.20%
发文量
438
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: PLOS Genetics is run by an international Editorial Board, headed by the Editors-in-Chief, Greg Barsh (HudsonAlpha Institute of Biotechnology, and Stanford University School of Medicine) and Greg Copenhaver (The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). Articles published in PLOS Genetics are archived in PubMed Central and cited in PubMed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信