Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: survival trend analysis of a comprehensive center.

Sara Coelho, Cláudia Costa, Ana Paula Santos, Pedro Souteiro, Joana Oliveira, Júlio Oliveira, Isabel Azevedo, Isabel Torres, Maria José Bento
{"title":"Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: survival trend analysis of a comprehensive center.","authors":"Sara Coelho,&nbsp;Cláudia Costa,&nbsp;Ana Paula Santos,&nbsp;Pedro Souteiro,&nbsp;Joana Oliveira,&nbsp;Júlio Oliveira,&nbsp;Isabel Azevedo,&nbsp;Isabel Torres,&nbsp;Maria José Bento","doi":"10.1530/EO-22-0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Therapeutic options for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia (Pan-NEN) have increased over the last decade. We aim to understand the evolution of the prognosis of patients with diagnosis of Pan-NEN within a 12-year period, considering the implementation of new treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with Pan-NENs between 2006 and 2017. Survival outcome estimates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. The impact of baseline clinicopathological characteristics on survival was explored with the use of Cox proportional hazard model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 97 patients, 77 (79.9%) had well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET) according to WHO 2010 classification, and 52 (53.6%) had localized or locoregional disease. There were no differences between clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes when comparing patients diagnosed between 2006-2011 and 2012-2017. Neuroendocrine carcinoma - HR 2.76, 95% CI 1.17-6.55 - and stages III and IV at diagnosis were independent poor prognostic factors - HR 6.02, 95% CI 2.22-16.33 and HR 6.93, 95% CI 2.94-16.32, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new therapeutic approaches did not induce better survival outcomes on Pan-NEN in recent years. This is possibly due to the indolent nature of NET grades 1 and 2, even metastatic, allowing patients to be submitted to new target therapies along their disease course.</p>","PeriodicalId":72907,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England)","volume":"2 1","pages":"32-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/90/e8/EO-22-0043.PMC10259287.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EO-22-0043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: Therapeutic options for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia (Pan-NEN) have increased over the last decade. We aim to understand the evolution of the prognosis of patients with diagnosis of Pan-NEN within a 12-year period, considering the implementation of new treatments.

Methods: This study is a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with Pan-NENs between 2006 and 2017. Survival outcome estimates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. The impact of baseline clinicopathological characteristics on survival was explored with the use of Cox proportional hazard model.

Results: Of the 97 patients, 77 (79.9%) had well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET) according to WHO 2010 classification, and 52 (53.6%) had localized or locoregional disease. There were no differences between clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes when comparing patients diagnosed between 2006-2011 and 2012-2017. Neuroendocrine carcinoma - HR 2.76, 95% CI 1.17-6.55 - and stages III and IV at diagnosis were independent poor prognostic factors - HR 6.02, 95% CI 2.22-16.33 and HR 6.93, 95% CI 2.94-16.32, respectively.

Conclusions: The new therapeutic approaches did not induce better survival outcomes on Pan-NEN in recent years. This is possibly due to the indolent nature of NET grades 1 and 2, even metastatic, allowing patients to be submitted to new target therapies along their disease course.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤:生存趋势综合分析中心。
目的:胰腺神经内分泌瘤(Pan-NEN)的治疗选择在过去十年中有所增加。我们的目的是了解诊断为Pan-NEN的患者在12年内的预后演变,考虑到新治疗的实施。方法:本研究对2006年至2017年诊断为Pan-NENs的患者进行回顾性队列研究。生存结局估计采用Kaplan-Meier法计算。采用Cox比例风险模型探讨基线临床病理特征对生存率的影响。结果:97例患者中,77例(79.9%)为WHO 2010分类的高分化神经内分泌肿瘤(NET), 52例(53.6%)为局部或局部病变。在比较2006-2011年和2012-2017年诊断的患者时,临床病理特征和生存结局没有差异。神经内分泌癌(HR 2.76, 95% CI 1.17-6.55)和诊断时的III期和IV期是独立的预后不良因素(HR 6.02, 95% CI 2.22-16.33)和HR 6.93, 95% CI 2.94-16.32。结论:近年来,新的治疗方法并没有给Pan-NEN患者带来更好的生存结果。这可能是由于NET 1级和2级的惰性,甚至转移性,允许患者在其病程中接受新的靶向治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信