Predicting Motor Outcomes Using Atlas-Based Voxel Features of Post-Stroke Neuroimaging: A Scoping Review.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ji-Hun Yoo, Benjamin Chong, Peter Alan Barber, Cathy Stinear, Alan Wang
{"title":"Predicting Motor Outcomes Using Atlas-Based Voxel Features of Post-Stroke Neuroimaging: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Ji-Hun Yoo,&nbsp;Benjamin Chong,&nbsp;Peter Alan Barber,&nbsp;Cathy Stinear,&nbsp;Alan Wang","doi":"10.1177/15459683231173668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atlas-based voxel features have the potential to aid motor outcome prognostication after stroke, but are seldom used in clinically feasible prediction models. This could be because neuroimaging feature development is a non-standardized, complex, multistep process. This is a barrier to entry for researchers and poses issues for reproducibility and validation in a field of research where sample sizes are typically small.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary aim of this review is to describe the methodologies currently used in motor outcome prediction studies using atlas-based voxel neuroimaging features. Another aim is to identify neuroanatomical regions commonly used for motor outcome prediction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol was constructed and OVID Medline and Scopus databases were searched for relevant studies. The studies were then screened and details about imaging modality, image acquisition, image normalization, lesion segmentation, region of interest determination, and imaging measures were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies were included and examined. Common limitations were a lack of detailed reporting on image acquisition and the specific brain templates used for normalization and a lack of clear reasoning behind the atlas or imaging measure selection. A wide variety of sensorimotor regions relate to motor outcomes and there is no consensus use of one single sensorimotor atlas for motor outcome prediction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is an ongoing need to validate imaging predictors and further improve methodological techniques and reporting standards in neuroimaging feature development for motor outcome prediction post-stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":56104,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","volume":"37 7","pages":"475-487"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b0/2f/10.1177_15459683231173668.PMC10350710.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683231173668","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Atlas-based voxel features have the potential to aid motor outcome prognostication after stroke, but are seldom used in clinically feasible prediction models. This could be because neuroimaging feature development is a non-standardized, complex, multistep process. This is a barrier to entry for researchers and poses issues for reproducibility and validation in a field of research where sample sizes are typically small.

Objectives: The primary aim of this review is to describe the methodologies currently used in motor outcome prediction studies using atlas-based voxel neuroimaging features. Another aim is to identify neuroanatomical regions commonly used for motor outcome prediction.

Methods: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol was constructed and OVID Medline and Scopus databases were searched for relevant studies. The studies were then screened and details about imaging modality, image acquisition, image normalization, lesion segmentation, region of interest determination, and imaging measures were extracted.

Results: Seventeen studies were included and examined. Common limitations were a lack of detailed reporting on image acquisition and the specific brain templates used for normalization and a lack of clear reasoning behind the atlas or imaging measure selection. A wide variety of sensorimotor regions relate to motor outcomes and there is no consensus use of one single sensorimotor atlas for motor outcome prediction.

Conclusion: There is an ongoing need to validate imaging predictors and further improve methodological techniques and reporting standards in neuroimaging feature development for motor outcome prediction post-stroke.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用基于阿特拉斯的脑卒中后神经成像体素特征预测运动预后:范围综述。
背景:基于阿特拉斯的体素特征有可能帮助中风后的运动预后预测,但很少用于临床可行的预测模型。这可能是因为神经影像学特征的发展是非标准化的、复杂的、多步骤的过程。这对研究人员来说是一个进入的障碍,并且在一个样本量通常很小的研究领域提出了可重复性和验证性问题。目的:本综述的主要目的是描述目前使用基于阿特拉斯的体素神经成像特征的运动结果预测研究中使用的方法。另一个目的是确定通常用于运动预后预测的神经解剖区域。方法:构建系统评价和meta分析首选报告项目方案,并检索OVID Medline和Scopus数据库查找相关研究。然后对研究进行筛选,提取成像方式、图像采集、图像归一化、病灶分割、感兴趣区域确定和成像措施等细节。结果:纳入并检查了17项研究。常见的限制是缺乏详细的图像采集报告和用于归一化的特定脑模板,以及在图谱或成像测量选择背后缺乏明确的推理。各种各样的感觉运动区域与运动结果有关,目前还没有共识使用单一的感觉运动图谱来预测运动结果。结论:在脑卒中后运动预后预测的神经影像学特征开发中,仍需要验证影像学预测指标,并进一步改进方法技术和报告标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair (NNR) offers innovative and reliable reports relevant to functional recovery from neural injury and long term neurologic care. The journal''s unique focus is evidence-based basic and clinical practice and research. NNR deals with the management and fundamental mechanisms of functional recovery from conditions such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer''s disease, brain and spinal cord injuries, and peripheral nerve injuries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信