Outcomes Of Reconstruction With Vascularized Vs Non Vascularized Bone Graft After Resection Of Bone Tumours- A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis.

Q3 Medicine
Sheikh Muhammad Ebad Ali, Sufyan Razak, Wajiha Fatima Khan, Shiza Khan, Devya Khaimchandani, Umme Roman Akhtar, Badaruddin Sahito, Ahmed Nadeem Abbasi
{"title":"Outcomes Of Reconstruction With Vascularized Vs Non Vascularized Bone Graft After Resection Of Bone Tumours- A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Sheikh Muhammad Ebad Ali,&nbsp;Sufyan Razak,&nbsp;Wajiha Fatima Khan,&nbsp;Shiza Khan,&nbsp;Devya Khaimchandani,&nbsp;Umme Roman Akhtar,&nbsp;Badaruddin Sahito,&nbsp;Ahmed Nadeem Abbasi","doi":"10.55519/JAMC-02-11511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vascularized (VBG) and non-vascularized (NVBG) bone grafting are two crucial biological reconstructive techniques in the management of bone tumours. The objective of this study is to compare the outcomes of reconstruction with vascularized and non-vascularized bone grafts after resection of bone tumours.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic evaluation of the literature from 2012-2021 was undertaken using the online databases PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library considering only comparative articles with specific outcomes for the restoration of the defect with vascularized and non-vascularized bone graft following the resection of bone tumours. The quality of the research methodology was evaluated using Oxford Quality Scoring System and Newcastle Ottawa Scale for randomized trials and non-randomized comparison research respectively. The SPSS version 23 was used to examine the data that was collected. Musculoskeletal tumour society score (MSTS), bone union time, and complications were the outcomes of this review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four clinical publications were considered, totalling 178 participants (92 men and 86 women) with 90 patients with VBG and 88 with NVBG. MSTS score and bone union time were the key outcomes that were measured. The overall MSTS (p>0.05) and rate of complications (p>0.05) results were comparable between the two groups, however, VBG had a better rate of bone union (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As a result of the quicker bone union, our systematic evaluation demonstrated that VBG causes earlier recovery. Complication rates and functional results were the same in both groups. The link between the bone union time and functional score following VBG and NVBG must also be demonstrated.</p>","PeriodicalId":15141,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad : JAMC","volume":"35 2","pages":"307-312"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad : JAMC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55519/JAMC-02-11511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vascularized (VBG) and non-vascularized (NVBG) bone grafting are two crucial biological reconstructive techniques in the management of bone tumours. The objective of this study is to compare the outcomes of reconstruction with vascularized and non-vascularized bone grafts after resection of bone tumours.

Methods: A systematic evaluation of the literature from 2012-2021 was undertaken using the online databases PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library considering only comparative articles with specific outcomes for the restoration of the defect with vascularized and non-vascularized bone graft following the resection of bone tumours. The quality of the research methodology was evaluated using Oxford Quality Scoring System and Newcastle Ottawa Scale for randomized trials and non-randomized comparison research respectively. The SPSS version 23 was used to examine the data that was collected. Musculoskeletal tumour society score (MSTS), bone union time, and complications were the outcomes of this review.

Results: Four clinical publications were considered, totalling 178 participants (92 men and 86 women) with 90 patients with VBG and 88 with NVBG. MSTS score and bone union time were the key outcomes that were measured. The overall MSTS (p>0.05) and rate of complications (p>0.05) results were comparable between the two groups, however, VBG had a better rate of bone union (p<0.001).

Conclusions: As a result of the quicker bone union, our systematic evaluation demonstrated that VBG causes earlier recovery. Complication rates and functional results were the same in both groups. The link between the bone union time and functional score following VBG and NVBG must also be demonstrated.

骨肿瘤切除术后血管化与非血管化骨移植重建的结果——系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:血管化(VBG)和非血管化(NVBG)骨移植是骨肿瘤治疗中两种重要的生物重建技术。本研究的目的是比较骨肿瘤切除术后带血管和不带血管的骨移植重建的结果。方法:使用PubMed/Medline、Google Scholar和Cochrane Library在线数据库对2012-2021年的文献进行系统评估,仅考虑具有骨肿瘤切除术后血管化和非血管化骨移植物修复缺损具体结果的比较文章。研究方法的质量分别采用牛津质量评分系统和纽卡斯尔渥太华量表进行随机试验和非随机比较研究。使用SPSS version 23对收集到的数据进行检验。肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会评分(MSTS)、骨愈合时间和并发症是本综述的结果。结果:4篇临床出版物被纳入,共178名参与者(92名男性和86名女性),其中90名患者患有VBG, 88名患者患有NVBG。MSTS评分和骨愈合时间是测量的主要结果。两组间MSTS总体(p>0.05)和并发症发生率(p>0.05)比较,但VBG的骨愈合率更高(p)。结论:由于VBG的骨愈合更快,我们的系统评价表明VBG可以更早地恢复。两组的并发症发生率和功能结果相同。还必须证明VBG和NVBG后骨愈合时间与功能评分之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
304
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信