Acceptability and Comfort Regarding Remotely Delivered PrEP Services in Mississippi.

IF 2.2 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Kayla K Giorlando, Trisha Arnold, Andrew P Barnett, Avery Leigland, Laura Whiteley, James B Brock, Larry K Brown
{"title":"Acceptability and Comfort Regarding Remotely Delivered PrEP Services in Mississippi.","authors":"Kayla K Giorlando,&nbsp;Trisha Arnold,&nbsp;Andrew P Barnett,&nbsp;Avery Leigland,&nbsp;Laura Whiteley,&nbsp;James B Brock,&nbsp;Larry K Brown","doi":"10.1177/23259582231186868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in Mississippi, access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is mostly limited to urban areas. Remote PrEP care via telemedicine, HIV self-testing, and prescription mail delivery can improve care in underserved communities. This mixed methods study assessed the acceptability and feasibility of using remote PrEP care, compared to alternatives. This consisted of (1) a cross-sectional survey and (2) interviews. PrEP-eligible adults were recruited from community-based organizations across Mississippi while accessing HIV testing between December 2019 and May 2022. Those surveyed (n = 63) indicated the greatest comfort in receiving PrEP via mail delivery (<i>m</i> = 5.14) and telemedicine (<i>m</i> = 4.89) and least comfort at gyms (<i>m</i> = 3.92). Comfort significantly differed between mail delivery and gyms (<i>F</i> = 2.90; <i>P</i> < .01). Those interviewed (n = 26) expressed relatively high comfort with remote PrEP care citing enhanced accessibility, privacy, simplicity, and quality. Remote PrEP services were acceptable and feasible among our sample, thus, should be expanded in Mississippi to address unmet needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d8/38/10.1177_23259582231186868.PMC10331183.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259582231186868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in Mississippi, access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is mostly limited to urban areas. Remote PrEP care via telemedicine, HIV self-testing, and prescription mail delivery can improve care in underserved communities. This mixed methods study assessed the acceptability and feasibility of using remote PrEP care, compared to alternatives. This consisted of (1) a cross-sectional survey and (2) interviews. PrEP-eligible adults were recruited from community-based organizations across Mississippi while accessing HIV testing between December 2019 and May 2022. Those surveyed (n = 63) indicated the greatest comfort in receiving PrEP via mail delivery (m = 5.14) and telemedicine (m = 4.89) and least comfort at gyms (m = 3.92). Comfort significantly differed between mail delivery and gyms (F = 2.90; P < .01). Those interviewed (n = 26) expressed relatively high comfort with remote PrEP care citing enhanced accessibility, privacy, simplicity, and quality. Remote PrEP services were acceptable and feasible among our sample, thus, should be expanded in Mississippi to address unmet needs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

密西西比州远程交付PrEP服务的可接受性和舒适性。
尽管人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)在密西西比州流行,但接触前预防(PrEP)的机会大多局限于城市地区。通过远程医疗、艾滋病毒自我检测和处方邮件递送的远程PrEP护理可以改善服务不足社区的护理。这项混合方法研究评估了与替代方案相比,使用远程PrEP护理的可接受性和可行性。这包括(1)横断面调查和(2)访谈。2019年12月至2022年5月期间,符合PrEP条件的成年人在接受艾滋病毒检测时,从密西西比州各地的社区组织招募。被调查者(n = 63)表示通过邮件递送接收PrEP的最大舒适度(m = 5.14)和远程医疗(m = 4.89)和健身房的最低舒适度(m = 3.92)。邮件递送和健身房的舒适度存在显著差异(F = 2.90;P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信