Comparing effects of alpha-blocker management on acute urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Yong Nam Gwon, Jae Joon Park, Won Jae Yang, Seung Whan Doo, Jae Heon Kim, Do Kyung Kim
{"title":"Comparing effects of alpha-blocker management on acute urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis","authors":"Yong Nam Gwon,&nbsp;Jae Joon Park,&nbsp;Won Jae Yang,&nbsp;Seung Whan Doo,&nbsp;Jae Heon Kim,&nbsp;Do Kyung Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2022.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To compare the effects of different alpha-blocker regimes on acute urinary retention (AUR) and the success rate of trial without catheter (TWOC) among patients with AUR secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) to determine the most effective regime.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to June 2021. Studies that compared successful TWOC rates between each alpha-blocker regime in patients with AUR secondary to BPH were included. The outcome was the odds ratio of successful TWOC after AUR between groups (each regime of alpha blocker or placebo). To indirectly compare the effect of each alpha-blocker regime on the outcome (successful TWOC rate), a network meta-analysis was conducted using a Bayesian hierarchical random effects model for dichotomous outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 13 randomized controlled trials were included in the present study. There were six nodes (five alpha-blocker regimes and placebo) and eight comparisons in the evidence network plot. Compared to placebo, alfuzosin, silodosin, tamsulosin, and alfuzosin plus tamsulosin resulted in significantly higher TWOC success rates, whereas doxazosin did not show a significant difference in TWOC success rate compared to placebo. Alfuzosin plus tamsulosin was ranked first, followed in order by tamsulosin, silodosin, alfuzosin, and doxazosin. There was no significant inconsistency in the results of this analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Alpha blockers may increase the success rate of TWOC. This study evaluated the priority of the effect of several alpha-blocker regimens on AUR related to BPH, which is expected to be helpful in selecting the best medication for patients with AUR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":"11 2","pages":"Pages 91-99"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9c/fd/main.PMC10318332.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888222000782","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background

To compare the effects of different alpha-blocker regimes on acute urinary retention (AUR) and the success rate of trial without catheter (TWOC) among patients with AUR secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) to determine the most effective regime.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to June 2021. Studies that compared successful TWOC rates between each alpha-blocker regime in patients with AUR secondary to BPH were included. The outcome was the odds ratio of successful TWOC after AUR between groups (each regime of alpha blocker or placebo). To indirectly compare the effect of each alpha-blocker regime on the outcome (successful TWOC rate), a network meta-analysis was conducted using a Bayesian hierarchical random effects model for dichotomous outcomes.

Results

In total, 13 randomized controlled trials were included in the present study. There were six nodes (five alpha-blocker regimes and placebo) and eight comparisons in the evidence network plot. Compared to placebo, alfuzosin, silodosin, tamsulosin, and alfuzosin plus tamsulosin resulted in significantly higher TWOC success rates, whereas doxazosin did not show a significant difference in TWOC success rate compared to placebo. Alfuzosin plus tamsulosin was ranked first, followed in order by tamsulosin, silodosin, alfuzosin, and doxazosin. There was no significant inconsistency in the results of this analysis.

Conclusions

Alpha blockers may increase the success rate of TWOC. This study evaluated the priority of the effect of several alpha-blocker regimens on AUR related to BPH, which is expected to be helpful in selecting the best medication for patients with AUR.

α受体阻滞剂治疗良性前列腺增生并发急性尿潴留的疗效比较:系统综述和网络荟萃分析
背景比较不同α受体阻滞剂方案对良性前列腺增生(BPH)继发急性尿潴留(AUR)患者的影响以及无导管试验的成功率,以确定最有效的方案。方法截至2021年6月,使用PubMed/Medline、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行综合文献检索。研究比较了每种α受体阻滞剂方案在BPH继发AUR患者中的成功TWOC率。结果是各组之间AUR后成功TWOC的比值比(每种方案的α-受体阻滞剂或安慰剂)。为了间接比较每种α受体阻滞剂方案对结果(成功的TWOC率)的影响,使用贝叶斯分层随机效应模型对二分结果进行了网络荟萃分析。结果本研究共纳入13项随机对照试验。证据网络图中有六个节点(五个α受体阻滞剂方案和安慰剂)和八个比较。与安慰剂相比,阿呋唑嗪、西罗酮、坦索罗辛和阿呋佐辛加坦索罗辛的TWOC成功率显著较高,而多沙唑嗪与安慰剂相比在TWOC的成功率方面没有显著差异。阿呋唑嗪加坦索罗辛排在第一位,其次是坦索罗辛、西罗多辛、阿呋佐辛和多沙唑嗪。该分析的结果没有明显的不一致。结论α受体阻滞剂可提高TWOC的成功率。本研究评估了几种α受体阻滞剂方案对与BPH相关的AUR的优先作用,预计这将有助于为AUR患者选择最佳药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prostate International
Prostate International Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
26.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Prostate International (Prostate Int, PI), the official English-language journal of Asian Pacific Prostate Society (APPS), is an international peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to basic and clinical studies on prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostatitis, and ...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信