Update on the second-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: a narrative review.

IF 4.2 3区 医学
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2023-09-04 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848231192750
Chih-An Shih, Chang-Bih Shie, Wei-Chen Tai, Seng-Kee Chuah, Hsi-Chang Lee, Ping-I Hsu
{"title":"Update on the second-line treatment of <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> infection: a narrative review.","authors":"Chih-An Shih, Chang-Bih Shie, Wei-Chen Tai, Seng-Kee Chuah, Hsi-Chang Lee, Ping-I Hsu","doi":"10.1177/17562848231192750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A standard bismuth quadruple therapy, a fluoroquinolone-containing triple (or quadruple) therapy or a proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-amoxicillin high-dose dual therapy has been recommended as a second-line treatment for <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> infection by the Maastricht VI/Florence Consensus Report. The major shortcoming of levofloxacin-amoxicillin triple therapy is low cure rate for eradicating levofloxacin-resistant strains. With the rising prevalence of levofloxacin-resistant strains, levofloxacin-amoxicillin triple therapy cannot reliably achieve a high eradication rate for second-line treatment of <i>H. pylori</i> infection in most countries now. The present article aims to review current second-line eradication regimens with a per-protocol eradication rate exceeding 85% in most geographic areas. Recently, a novel tetracycline-levofloxacin quadruple therapy consisting of a PPI, bismuth, tetracycline, and levofloxacin for rescue treatment of <i>H. pylori</i> infection has been developed. The new therapy achieved a higher per-protocol eradication rate than levofloxacin-amoxicillin triple treatment in a randomized controlled trial (98% <i>versus</i> 69%). Additionally, the tetracycline-levofloxacin quadruple therapy also exhibits a higher eradication rate than amoxicillin-levofloxacin quadruple therapy. High-dose dual PPI-amoxicillin therapy is another novel second-line treatment for <i>H. pylori</i> infection. The new therapy can achieve an eradication rate of 89% by per-protocol analysis for the second-line treatment in Taiwan. Recently, levofloxacin-based sequential quadruple therapy and potassium-competitive acid blocker have also been applied in the second-line treatment of <i>H. pylori</i> infection. A meta-analysis revealed that a vonoprazan-based regimen has significant superiority over a PPI-based regimen for second-line <i>H. pylori</i> eradication therapy. In conclusion, the eradication rate of levofloxacin-amoxicillin triple therapy is suboptimal in the second-line treatment of <i>H. pylori</i> infection now. Currently, a standard bismuth quadruple therapy (tetracycline-metronidazole quadruple therapy), a tetracycline-levofloxacin quadruple therapy, an amoxicillin-levofloxacin quadruple therapy, a levofloxacin-based sequential quadruple therapy or a high-dose PPI-amoxicillin dual therapy is recommended for the second-line treatment of <i>H. pylori</i> infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":23022,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":"16 ","pages":"17562848231192750"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/33/1a/10.1177_17562848231192750.PMC10478561.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848231192750","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A standard bismuth quadruple therapy, a fluoroquinolone-containing triple (or quadruple) therapy or a proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-amoxicillin high-dose dual therapy has been recommended as a second-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection by the Maastricht VI/Florence Consensus Report. The major shortcoming of levofloxacin-amoxicillin triple therapy is low cure rate for eradicating levofloxacin-resistant strains. With the rising prevalence of levofloxacin-resistant strains, levofloxacin-amoxicillin triple therapy cannot reliably achieve a high eradication rate for second-line treatment of H. pylori infection in most countries now. The present article aims to review current second-line eradication regimens with a per-protocol eradication rate exceeding 85% in most geographic areas. Recently, a novel tetracycline-levofloxacin quadruple therapy consisting of a PPI, bismuth, tetracycline, and levofloxacin for rescue treatment of H. pylori infection has been developed. The new therapy achieved a higher per-protocol eradication rate than levofloxacin-amoxicillin triple treatment in a randomized controlled trial (98% versus 69%). Additionally, the tetracycline-levofloxacin quadruple therapy also exhibits a higher eradication rate than amoxicillin-levofloxacin quadruple therapy. High-dose dual PPI-amoxicillin therapy is another novel second-line treatment for H. pylori infection. The new therapy can achieve an eradication rate of 89% by per-protocol analysis for the second-line treatment in Taiwan. Recently, levofloxacin-based sequential quadruple therapy and potassium-competitive acid blocker have also been applied in the second-line treatment of H. pylori infection. A meta-analysis revealed that a vonoprazan-based regimen has significant superiority over a PPI-based regimen for second-line H. pylori eradication therapy. In conclusion, the eradication rate of levofloxacin-amoxicillin triple therapy is suboptimal in the second-line treatment of H. pylori infection now. Currently, a standard bismuth quadruple therapy (tetracycline-metronidazole quadruple therapy), a tetracycline-levofloxacin quadruple therapy, an amoxicillin-levofloxacin quadruple therapy, a levofloxacin-based sequential quadruple therapy or a high-dose PPI-amoxicillin dual therapy is recommended for the second-line treatment of H. pylori infection.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

幽门螺杆菌感染二线治疗的最新进展:综述。
标准铋剂四联疗法、含氟喹诺酮的三联(或四联)疗法或质子泵抑制剂(PPI)-阿莫西林大剂量双联疗法已被《马斯特里赫特共识报告》(Maastricht VI/Florence Consensus Report)推荐为幽门螺杆菌感染的二线疗法。左氧氟沙星-阿莫西林三联疗法的主要缺点是根除左氧氟沙星耐药菌株的治愈率较低。随着耐左氧氟沙星菌株发病率的上升,目前在大多数国家,左氧氟沙星-阿莫西林三联疗法在幽门螺杆菌感染的二线治疗中无法可靠地达到较高的根除率。本文旨在回顾目前在大多数地区每方案根除率超过 85% 的二线根除方案。最近,一种由 PPI、铋剂、四环素和左氧氟沙星组成的新型四环素-左氧氟沙星四联疗法被开发出来,用于幽门螺杆菌感染的抢救治疗。在一项随机对照试验中,与左氧氟沙星-阿莫西林三联疗法相比,新疗法的每方案根除率更高(98% 对 69%)。此外,四环素-左氧氟沙星四联疗法的根除率也高于阿莫西林-左氧氟沙星四联疗法。大剂量 PPI-阿莫西林双联疗法是治疗幽门螺杆菌感染的另一种新型二线疗法。在台湾,这种新疗法的二线治疗按方案分析的根除率可达 89%。最近,以左氧氟沙星为基础的序贯四联疗法和钾竞争性酸阻断剂也被应用于幽门螺杆菌感染的二线治疗。一项荟萃分析显示,在根除幽门螺杆菌的二线治疗中,以vonoprazan为基础的方案明显优于以PPI为基础的方案。总之,目前在幽门螺杆菌感染的二线治疗中,左氧氟沙星-阿莫西林三联疗法的根除率并不理想。目前,在幽门螺杆菌感染的二线治疗中,推荐使用标准铋剂四联疗法(四环素-甲硝唑四联疗法)、四环素-左氧氟沙星四联疗法、阿莫西林-左氧氟沙星四联疗法、以左氧氟沙星为基础的序贯四联疗法或大剂量 PPI-阿莫西林双重疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
2.40%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area. The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信