Patient profiles, treatment patterns, and outcomes among persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer patients under routine care in the United States

Q3 Medicine
Mugdha Gokhale , Rebekah Yu , Matthew Monberg , Cumhur Tekin , Lei Chen , Richard W. DeClue , Keith Knapp , Lincy S. Lal
{"title":"Patient profiles, treatment patterns, and outcomes among persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer patients under routine care in the United States","authors":"Mugdha Gokhale ,&nbsp;Rebekah Yu ,&nbsp;Matthew Monberg ,&nbsp;Cumhur Tekin ,&nbsp;Lei Chen ,&nbsp;Richard W. DeClue ,&nbsp;Keith Knapp ,&nbsp;Lincy S. Lal","doi":"10.1016/j.ctarc.2023.100726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer have poor prognosis. While recent advances have expanded treatment options, real-world data on treatment patterns and outcomes in this population are lacking.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study identified adult females with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer from the ConcertAI Oncology Dataset who received systemic therapy on or after August 15, 2014. Patients were followed from persistent, recurrent, or metastatic diagnosis through third-line (3 L) therapy, death, end of record, or study end (June 2021). Data collection included patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes. Kaplan-Meier methods were used for the three most common first-line (1 L) regimens to analyze real-world time on treatment (rwToT), real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), and real-world overall survival (rwOS). Analyses were stratified by bevacizumab receipt by treatment line.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>307 patients were included (mean [standard deviation] age 51.5 [13.2] years, 70.7% White). 91.2% of patients had metastatic disease, 8.5% had persistent disease, and &lt;1% had recurrent disease. The most common 1 L regimen was carboplatin+paclitaxel+bevacizumab (40.7%) with median (95% confidence interval [CI]) rwToT of 3.5 (2.9–4.4) months. 57.0% of patients proceeded to second line (2 L), and 25.7% went to 3 L. Median (95% CI) rwPFS was 7.2 (6.4–8.1) months, and median (95% CI) rwOS was 16.5 (14.2–19.9) months, from initiation of 1 L.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>1 L regimens received in patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer generally followed clinical guidelines, and the rwOS agrees with clinical trials. This study highlights the burden of disease and unmet need for specific treatments in these patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9507,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment and research communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment and research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294223000473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective

Patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer have poor prognosis. While recent advances have expanded treatment options, real-world data on treatment patterns and outcomes in this population are lacking.

Methods

This retrospective study identified adult females with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer from the ConcertAI Oncology Dataset who received systemic therapy on or after August 15, 2014. Patients were followed from persistent, recurrent, or metastatic diagnosis through third-line (3 L) therapy, death, end of record, or study end (June 2021). Data collection included patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes. Kaplan-Meier methods were used for the three most common first-line (1 L) regimens to analyze real-world time on treatment (rwToT), real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), and real-world overall survival (rwOS). Analyses were stratified by bevacizumab receipt by treatment line.

Results

307 patients were included (mean [standard deviation] age 51.5 [13.2] years, 70.7% White). 91.2% of patients had metastatic disease, 8.5% had persistent disease, and <1% had recurrent disease. The most common 1 L regimen was carboplatin+paclitaxel+bevacizumab (40.7%) with median (95% confidence interval [CI]) rwToT of 3.5 (2.9–4.4) months. 57.0% of patients proceeded to second line (2 L), and 25.7% went to 3 L. Median (95% CI) rwPFS was 7.2 (6.4–8.1) months, and median (95% CI) rwOS was 16.5 (14.2–19.9) months, from initiation of 1 L.

Conclusions

1 L regimens received in patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer generally followed clinical guidelines, and the rwOS agrees with clinical trials. This study highlights the burden of disease and unmet need for specific treatments in these patients.

在美国接受常规护理的持续性、复发性或转移性宫颈癌患者的患者概况、治疗模式和结果
目的持续性、复发性或转移性宫颈癌症患者预后不良。虽然最近的进展扩大了治疗选择,但缺乏关于这一人群治疗模式和结果的真实数据。方法这项回顾性研究从ConcertAI肿瘤数据集中确定了在2014年8月15日或之后接受全身治疗的患有持续性、复发性或转移性宫颈癌症的成年女性。通过三线(3L)治疗、死亡、记录结束或研究结束(2021年6月),对患者进行持续性、复发性或转移性诊断随访。数据收集包括患者特征、治疗模式和临床结果。Kaplan-Meier方法用于三种最常见的一线(1L)方案,以分析真实世界的治疗时间(rwToT)、真实世界的无进展生存期(rwPFS)和真实世界的总生存期(rwOS)。分析按贝伐单抗的接受情况按治疗线进行分层。结果纳入307例患者(平均[标准差]年龄51.5[13.2]岁,70.7%为白人)。91.2%的患者有转移性疾病,8.5%有持续性疾病,<;1%的患者有复发性疾病。最常见的1L方案是卡铂+紫杉醇+贝伐单抗(40.7%),中位(95%置信区间[CI])rwToT为3.5(2.9-4.4)个月。57.0%的患者进入二线(2L),25.7%的患者进入3L。中位(95%CI)rwPFS为7.2(6.4-8.1)个月,中位(95%CI)rwOS为16.5(14.2-19.9)个月。结论1持续性、复发性或转移性宫颈癌症患者接受的L方案通常遵循临床指南,rwOS与临床试验一致。这项研究强调了这些患者的疾病负担和对特定治疗的未满足需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
148
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Treatment and Research Communications is an international peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing comprehensive basic, translational, and clinical oncology research. The journal is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, policy, and treatment of cancer and provides a global forum for the nurturing and development of future generations of oncology scientists. Cancer Treatment and Research Communications publishes comprehensive reviews and original studies describing various aspects of basic through clinical research of all tumor types. The journal also accepts clinical studies in oncology, with an emphasis on prospective early phase clinical trials. Specific areas of interest include basic, translational, and clinical research and mechanistic approaches; cancer biology; molecular carcinogenesis; genetics and genomics; stem cell and developmental biology; immunology; molecular and cellular oncology; systems biology; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; cancer policy; and integration of various approaches. Our mission is to be the premier source of relevant information through promoting excellence in research and facilitating the timely translation of that science to health care and clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信