Pathologic Nodal Staging Before SBRT for Early-stage NSCLC Does Not Impact Overall Survival: A Propensity Score-matched NCDB Analysis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
James N Cantrell, Pawan Acharya, Sara K Vesely, Tyler C Gunter
{"title":"Pathologic Nodal Staging Before SBRT for Early-stage NSCLC Does Not Impact Overall Survival: A Propensity Score-matched NCDB Analysis.","authors":"James N Cantrell, Pawan Acharya, Sara K Vesely, Tyler C Gunter","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early-stage non-small cell carcinoma of the lung (NSCLC) is increasingly utilized. We sought to assess overall survival (OS) for early-stage NSCLC patients receiving SBRT depending on staging method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Early-stage NSCLC patients treated with definitive SBRT were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB), and OS was determined based on method of staging. Patient, disease, and treatment characteristics were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12,106 patients were included; 865 (7%) received invasive staging (nodal sampling, NS) and 11,241 (93%) had no nodal sampling (NNS). From this larger dataset, a propensity score matching (1:1 without replacement) was performed, which yielded 839 patients for each group (NNS and NS). With a median follow-up time of 3.12 years, median survival for all patients included in the matched dataset was 2.75 years (95% CI: 2.55-2.93 y), with 2- and 5-year OS estimated at 63.9% and 25.7%, respectively. In a multivariable analysis on matched data, there was no difference in mortality risk between the NNS and NS groups (hazard ratio=1.08, 95% CI: 0.94-1.24, P =0.25). Negative prognostic factors identified in the multivariable analysis of the matched data included: age more than 65, male sex, Charlson-Deyo Score ≥1, and tumor size ≥3 cm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SBRT use in early-stage NSCLC steadily increased over the study period. Most patients proceeded to SBRT without nodal staging, conflicting with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines which recommend pathologic mediastinal lymph node evaluation for all early-stage NSCLC cases, except stage IA. Our findings suggest similar OS in patients with early-stage NSCLC treated with SBRT irrespective of nodal staging. Furthermore, we highlight patient-related, disease-related, and treatment-related prognostic factors to consider when planning therapy for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10874178/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early-stage non-small cell carcinoma of the lung (NSCLC) is increasingly utilized. We sought to assess overall survival (OS) for early-stage NSCLC patients receiving SBRT depending on staging method.

Methods: Early-stage NSCLC patients treated with definitive SBRT were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB), and OS was determined based on method of staging. Patient, disease, and treatment characteristics were also analyzed.

Results: A total of 12,106 patients were included; 865 (7%) received invasive staging (nodal sampling, NS) and 11,241 (93%) had no nodal sampling (NNS). From this larger dataset, a propensity score matching (1:1 without replacement) was performed, which yielded 839 patients for each group (NNS and NS). With a median follow-up time of 3.12 years, median survival for all patients included in the matched dataset was 2.75 years (95% CI: 2.55-2.93 y), with 2- and 5-year OS estimated at 63.9% and 25.7%, respectively. In a multivariable analysis on matched data, there was no difference in mortality risk between the NNS and NS groups (hazard ratio=1.08, 95% CI: 0.94-1.24, P =0.25). Negative prognostic factors identified in the multivariable analysis of the matched data included: age more than 65, male sex, Charlson-Deyo Score ≥1, and tumor size ≥3 cm.

Conclusions: SBRT use in early-stage NSCLC steadily increased over the study period. Most patients proceeded to SBRT without nodal staging, conflicting with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines which recommend pathologic mediastinal lymph node evaluation for all early-stage NSCLC cases, except stage IA. Our findings suggest similar OS in patients with early-stage NSCLC treated with SBRT irrespective of nodal staging. Furthermore, we highlight patient-related, disease-related, and treatment-related prognostic factors to consider when planning therapy for these patients.

早期NSCLC SBRT前的病理结节分期不影响总体生存率:倾向评分匹配的NCDB分析。
目的:立体定向放射治疗早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的应用日益广泛。我们试图根据分期方法评估接受SBRT的早期NSCLC患者的总生存率(OS)。方法:在国家癌症数据库(NCDB)中确定接受明确SBRT治疗的早期NSCLC患者,并根据分期方法确定OS。还分析了患者、疾病和治疗特点。结果:共纳入12106例患者;865例(7%)接受有创分期(淋巴结取样,NS),11241例(93%)未接受淋巴结取样(NNS)。从这个更大的数据集中,进行了倾向评分匹配(1:1,无替换),每组产生839名患者(NNS和NS)。中位随访时间为3.12年,匹配数据集中所有患者的中位生存期为2.75年(95%CI:2.55-2.93 y),2年和5年OS估计分别为63.9%和25.7%。在对匹配数据的多变量分析中,NNS组和NS组的死亡率风险没有差异(危险比=1.08,95%CI:0.94-12.4,P=0.025)。在对匹配的数据的多因素分析中确定的负面预后因素包括:年龄超过65岁,男性,Charlson-Deyo评分≥1,肿瘤大小≥3cm。结论:SBRT在早期NSCLC中的应用在研究期间稳步增加。大多数患者在没有淋巴结分期的情况下进行了SBRT,这与国家癌症综合网络(NCCN)指南相冲突,该指南建议对除IA期外的所有早期NSCLC病例进行病理性纵隔淋巴结评估。我们的研究结果表明,无论淋巴结分期如何,SBRT治疗的早期NSCLC患者的OS相似。此外,我们强调了患者相关、疾病相关和治疗相关的预后因素,在为这些患者规划治疗时需要考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​American Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for cancer surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, and pediatric oncologists. The emphasis of AJCO is on combined modality multidisciplinary loco-regional management of cancer. The journal also gives emphasis to translational research, outcome studies, and cost utility analyses, and includes opinion pieces and review articles. The editorial board includes a large number of distinguished surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, pediatric oncologists, and others who are internationally recognized for expertise in their fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信