Regulatory Measures to Improve the Safety of CAR-T-Cell Treatment.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Philipp Berg, Sonja Schönefeld, Gabriele Ruppert-Seipp, Markus B Funk
{"title":"Regulatory Measures to Improve the Safety of CAR-T-Cell Treatment.","authors":"Philipp Berg,&nbsp;Sonja Schönefeld,&nbsp;Gabriele Ruppert-Seipp,&nbsp;Markus B Funk","doi":"10.1159/000526786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Regulatory activities aim to facilitate the safe use of novel therapeutics such as genetically engineered chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells. Toxicities associated with CAR-T-cell therapies have led to modified safety management guidance in clinical trials and the implementation of post-marketing requirements. The aim of this study was to estimate the effect of individual risk-minimizing measures to evaluate the appropriateness of regulatory activities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We re-examined clinical trial data prior to and after the introduction of revised treatment guidelines; we analysed spontaneous adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports submitted to the EudraVigilance database in 2019/2020 regarding their completeness; and we performed a survey of treatment centres in Germany that have been qualified for the use of commercial CAR-T cells.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lower combined incidences of severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) as well as neurotoxicity occurred following CAR-T-cell treatment after a revision of management guidelines, suggesting earlier intervention compared to before (12.6% vs. 20.5%). Numerous post-marketing ADR reports lacked information important for case assessment. Full details on treatment indication, CRS onset, outcome, and grading were available for just 38.3% of CRS cases. Survey responses support the majority of regulatory requirements for centre qualification. Time investment was highest for training of healthcare professionals, which required an average of 6.5 staff members (range 2-20) and lasted more than 2 days per person in half of the facilities. The need to harmonize the regulatory requirements for the different CAR-T-cell therapeutics was emphasized.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Defined regulatory measures can support the safe and effective use of new therapies and are indicated for structured recording of post-marketing data, and the evaluation of such measures appears to be necessary for the continuous improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/43/95/tmh-0050-0218.PMC10331154.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000526786","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Regulatory activities aim to facilitate the safe use of novel therapeutics such as genetically engineered chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells. Toxicities associated with CAR-T-cell therapies have led to modified safety management guidance in clinical trials and the implementation of post-marketing requirements. The aim of this study was to estimate the effect of individual risk-minimizing measures to evaluate the appropriateness of regulatory activities.

Methods: We re-examined clinical trial data prior to and after the introduction of revised treatment guidelines; we analysed spontaneous adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports submitted to the EudraVigilance database in 2019/2020 regarding their completeness; and we performed a survey of treatment centres in Germany that have been qualified for the use of commercial CAR-T cells.

Results: Lower combined incidences of severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) as well as neurotoxicity occurred following CAR-T-cell treatment after a revision of management guidelines, suggesting earlier intervention compared to before (12.6% vs. 20.5%). Numerous post-marketing ADR reports lacked information important for case assessment. Full details on treatment indication, CRS onset, outcome, and grading were available for just 38.3% of CRS cases. Survey responses support the majority of regulatory requirements for centre qualification. Time investment was highest for training of healthcare professionals, which required an average of 6.5 staff members (range 2-20) and lasted more than 2 days per person in half of the facilities. The need to harmonize the regulatory requirements for the different CAR-T-cell therapeutics was emphasized.

Conclusion: Defined regulatory measures can support the safe and effective use of new therapies and are indicated for structured recording of post-marketing data, and the evaluation of such measures appears to be necessary for the continuous improvement.

提高car - t细胞治疗安全性的监管措施
导言:调控活动旨在促进新疗法的安全使用,如基因工程嵌合抗原受体(CAR)-T细胞。与car - t细胞疗法相关的毒性已导致临床试验中安全管理指南的修改和上市后要求的实施。本研究的目的是估计个体风险最小化措施的效果,以评估监管活动的适当性。方法:我们在引入修订后的治疗指南之前和之后重新审查临床试验数据;我们分析了2019/2020年提交给EudraVigilance数据库的自发性药物不良反应(ADR)报告的完整性;我们对德国有资格使用商业CAR-T细胞的治疗中心进行了调查。结果:car - t细胞治疗后,在修订管理指南后,严重细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)和神经毒性的综合发生率较低,表明与之前相比,更早的干预(12.6%对20.5%)。许多上市后不良反应报告缺乏对病例评估重要的信息。只有38.3%的CRS病例可获得有关治疗指征、CRS发病、结局和分级的详细信息。调查结果支持大多数对中心资格的监管要求。培训保健专业人员的时间投入最高,平均需要6.5名工作人员(范围2-20人),在一半的设施中,每人持续时间超过2天。强调了协调不同car - t细胞疗法的监管要求的必要性。结论:明确的监管措施可以支持新疗法的安全有效使用,并适用于上市后数据的结构化记录,对这些措施的评估似乎是持续改进的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信