Succinate dehydrogenase variants in paraganglioma: why are B subunit variants 'bad'?

Lucinda M Gruber, Steven N Hart, Louis James Maher Iii
{"title":"Succinate dehydrogenase variants in paraganglioma: why are B subunit variants 'bad'?","authors":"Lucinda M Gruber,&nbsp;Steven N Hart,&nbsp;Louis James Maher Iii","doi":"10.1530/EO-22-0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mutations that predispose to familial pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma include inherited variants in the four genes (<i>SDHA</i>, <i>SDHB</i>, <i>SDHC</i> and <i>SDHD</i>) encoding subunits of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), an enzyme of the mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid cycle and complex II of the electron transport chain. In heterozygous variant carriers, somatic loss of heterozygosity is thought to result in tumorigenic accumulation of succinate and reactive oxygen species. Inexplicably, variants affecting the SDHB subunit predict worse clinical outcomes. Why? Here we consider two hypotheses. First, relative to SDH A, C and D subunits, the small SDHB subunit might be more intrinsically 'fragile' to missense mutations because of its relatively large fraction of amino acids contacting prosthetic groups and other SDH subunits. We show evidence that supports this hypothesis. Second, the natural pool of human SDHB variants might, by chance, be biased toward severe truncating variants and missense variants causing more disruptive amino acid substitutions. We tested this hypothesis by creating a database of known SDH variants and predicting their biochemical severities. Our data suggest that natural SDHB variants are more pathogenic. It is unclear if this bias is sufficient to explain clinical data. Other explanations include the possibility that SDH subcomplexes remaining after SDHB loss have unique tumorigenic gain-of-function characteristics, and/or that SDHB may have additional unknown tumor-suppressor functions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72907,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England)","volume":"3 1","pages":"e220093"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/58/cb/EO-22-0093.PMC10305465.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EO-22-0093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mutations that predispose to familial pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma include inherited variants in the four genes (SDHA, SDHB, SDHC and SDHD) encoding subunits of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), an enzyme of the mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid cycle and complex II of the electron transport chain. In heterozygous variant carriers, somatic loss of heterozygosity is thought to result in tumorigenic accumulation of succinate and reactive oxygen species. Inexplicably, variants affecting the SDHB subunit predict worse clinical outcomes. Why? Here we consider two hypotheses. First, relative to SDH A, C and D subunits, the small SDHB subunit might be more intrinsically 'fragile' to missense mutations because of its relatively large fraction of amino acids contacting prosthetic groups and other SDH subunits. We show evidence that supports this hypothesis. Second, the natural pool of human SDHB variants might, by chance, be biased toward severe truncating variants and missense variants causing more disruptive amino acid substitutions. We tested this hypothesis by creating a database of known SDH variants and predicting their biochemical severities. Our data suggest that natural SDHB variants are more pathogenic. It is unclear if this bias is sufficient to explain clinical data. Other explanations include the possibility that SDH subcomplexes remaining after SDHB loss have unique tumorigenic gain-of-function characteristics, and/or that SDHB may have additional unknown tumor-suppressor functions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

副神经节瘤的琥珀酸脱氢酶变异:为什么B亚基变异是“坏的”?
易患家族性嗜铬细胞瘤和副神经节瘤的突变包括四个基因(SDHA、SDHB、SDHC和SDHD)的遗传变异,这些基因编码琥珀酸脱氢酶(SDH)亚基,SDH是线粒体三羧酸循环和电子传递链复合物II的酶。在杂合变异携带者中,体细胞杂合性的丧失被认为会导致琥珀酸盐和活性氧的致瘤性积累。令人费解的是,影响SDHB亚基的变异预示着更糟糕的临床结果。为什么?这里我们考虑两个假设。首先,相对于SDH A、C和D亚基,较小的SDHB亚基可能在本质上更“脆弱”,容易发生错义突变,因为它与假基和其他SDH亚基接触的氨基酸比例相对较大。我们展示了支持这一假设的证据。其次,人类SDHB变异的自然资源库可能偶然地偏向于严重的截断变异和错义变异,导致更多的破坏性氨基酸取代。我们通过创建已知SDH变异的数据库并预测其生化严重程度来验证这一假设。我们的数据表明,天然的SDHB变异更具致病性。目前尚不清楚这种偏倚是否足以解释临床数据。其他解释包括SDHB丢失后残留的SDH亚复合物具有独特的致瘤性功能获得特性,和/或SDHB可能具有其他未知的肿瘤抑制功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信