Past or Present; Which Exposures Predict Metabolomic Aging Better? The Doetinchem Cohort Study.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Annelot P Smit, Gerrie-Cor M Herber, Lieke M Kuiper, Bette Loef, H Susan J Picavet, W M Monique Verschuren
{"title":"Past or Present; Which Exposures Predict Metabolomic Aging Better? The Doetinchem Cohort Study.","authors":"Annelot P Smit, Gerrie-Cor M Herber, Lieke M Kuiper, Bette Loef, H Susan J Picavet, W M Monique Verschuren","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glad202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People age differently. Differences in aging might be reflected by metabolites, also known as metabolomic aging. Predicting metabolomic aging is of interest in public health research. However, the added value of longitudinal over cross-sectional predictors of metabolomic aging is unknown. We studied exposome-related exposures as potential predictors of metabolomic aging, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally in men and women. We used data from 4 459 participants, aged 36-75 of Round 4 (2003-2008) of the long-running Doetinchem Cohort Study (DCS). Metabolomic age was calculated with the MetaboHealth algorithm. Cross-sectional exposures were demographic, biological, lifestyle, and environmental at Round 4. Longitudinal exposures were based on the average exposure over 15 years (Round 1 [1987-1991] to 4), and trend in these exposure over time. Random Forest was performed to identify model performance and important predictors. Prediction performances were similar for cross-sectional and longitudinal exposures in both men (R2 6.8 and 5.8, respectively) and women (R2 14.8 and 14.4, respectively). Biological and diet exposures were most predictive for metabolomic aging in both men and women. Other important predictors were smoking behavior for men and contraceptive use and menopausal status for women. Taking into account history of exposure levels (longitudinal) had no added value over cross-sectionally measured exposures in predicting metabolomic aging in the current study. However, the prediction performances of both models were rather low. The most important predictors for metabolomic aging were from the biological and lifestyle domain and differed slightly between men and women.</p>","PeriodicalId":49953,"journal":{"name":"Journals of Gerontology Series A-Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10799759/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journals of Gerontology Series A-Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glad202","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People age differently. Differences in aging might be reflected by metabolites, also known as metabolomic aging. Predicting metabolomic aging is of interest in public health research. However, the added value of longitudinal over cross-sectional predictors of metabolomic aging is unknown. We studied exposome-related exposures as potential predictors of metabolomic aging, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally in men and women. We used data from 4 459 participants, aged 36-75 of Round 4 (2003-2008) of the long-running Doetinchem Cohort Study (DCS). Metabolomic age was calculated with the MetaboHealth algorithm. Cross-sectional exposures were demographic, biological, lifestyle, and environmental at Round 4. Longitudinal exposures were based on the average exposure over 15 years (Round 1 [1987-1991] to 4), and trend in these exposure over time. Random Forest was performed to identify model performance and important predictors. Prediction performances were similar for cross-sectional and longitudinal exposures in both men (R2 6.8 and 5.8, respectively) and women (R2 14.8 and 14.4, respectively). Biological and diet exposures were most predictive for metabolomic aging in both men and women. Other important predictors were smoking behavior for men and contraceptive use and menopausal status for women. Taking into account history of exposure levels (longitudinal) had no added value over cross-sectionally measured exposures in predicting metabolomic aging in the current study. However, the prediction performances of both models were rather low. The most important predictors for metabolomic aging were from the biological and lifestyle domain and differed slightly between men and women.

过去还是现在;哪种暴露能更好地预测代谢组衰老?Doetinchem队列研究。
人的衰老方式各不相同。衰老的差异可能通过代谢物反映出来,这也被称为代谢组学衰老。预测代谢组衰老是公共卫生研究的兴趣所在。然而,与横截面预测指标相比,代谢组老化的纵向预测指标的附加值尚不清楚。我们研究了作为代谢组老化潜在预测因子的暴露组相关暴露,包括男性和女性的横截面和纵向暴露。我们使用的数据来自长期进行的Doetinchem队列研究(DCS)第4轮(2003-2008年)的4 459名36-75岁的参与者。代谢组年龄采用 MetaboHealth 算法计算。横向暴露是指第 4 轮研究中的人口统计学、生物学、生活方式和环境暴露。纵向暴露基于 15 年(第 1 轮 [1987-1991] 至第 4 轮)的平均暴露,以及这些暴露随时间变化的趋势。采用随机森林方法来确定模型的性能和重要的预测因素。男性(R2 分别为 6.8 和 5.8)和女性(R2 分别为 14.8 和 14.4)的横向和纵向暴露预测性能相似。在男性和女性中,生物和饮食暴露对代谢组学老化的预测作用最大。其他重要的预测因素包括男性的吸烟行为以及女性的避孕药具使用和绝经状况。在目前的研究中,考虑暴露水平的历史(纵向)在预测代谢组老化方面没有比横截面测量的暴露更有价值。不过,这两个模型的预测性能都相当低。预测代谢组老化的最重要因素来自生物和生活方式领域,男女之间略有不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
233
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Publishes articles representing the full range of medical sciences pertaining to aging. Appropriate areas include, but are not limited to, basic medical science, clinical epidemiology, clinical research, and health services research for professions such as medicine, dentistry, allied health sciences, and nursing. It publishes articles on research pertinent to human biology and disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信