Crisis management for Patient Safety Officers: lessons learned from the Covid-19 pandemic.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Ilya Kagan, Dana Arad, Riki Aharoni, Yossi Tal, Yaron Niv
{"title":"Crisis management for Patient Safety Officers: lessons learned from the Covid-19 pandemic.","authors":"Ilya Kagan, Dana Arad, Riki Aharoni, Yossi Tal, Yaron Niv","doi":"10.1186/s13584-023-00577-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is no consensus for the role definition for Patient Safety Officers (PSOs) in healthcare during pandemics or other crises as opposed to their routine activities. This study aimed to examine the contribution of personality traits and systemic factors on the performance of PSOs during the pandemic, and to compare these variables during the first and third waves of the Covid-19 pandemic in Israel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study invited 117 PSOs to complete a questionnaire addressing their role during the Covid-19 pandemic. The questionnaire included items concerning: Personal and socio-demographic characteristics; Uncertainty; Personal initiative; Burnout; Professional functioning; Patient Safety and Risk Management policies and practices; Organizational functioning; and Personal Involvement in risk management activities. Qualitative data was collected by two open-ended questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 78 PSOs (67%) completed the questionnaire. The results revealed that many PSOs reduced their involvement in risk management processes or even left their position temporarily in order to return to their primary specialization as clinicians. Only 51.3% and 57.7% reported practicing risk management in the first and third waves, respectively. The three main factors that kept PSOs functioning were managerial support, mobilization of their team, and the belief in the importance of their position.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A crisis generates uncertainty, a plethora of frequent and urgent tasks, and the need to adapt policy to changing circumstances and to the increased risks. The risk manager must be a member of the crisis management team and participate in every important discussion in order to represent essential staff and patient safety issues and ensure that these are fully addressed already in the early stages of planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":46694,"journal":{"name":"Israel Journal of Health Policy Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10472639/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Journal of Health Policy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-023-00577-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is no consensus for the role definition for Patient Safety Officers (PSOs) in healthcare during pandemics or other crises as opposed to their routine activities. This study aimed to examine the contribution of personality traits and systemic factors on the performance of PSOs during the pandemic, and to compare these variables during the first and third waves of the Covid-19 pandemic in Israel.

Methods: This cross-sectional study invited 117 PSOs to complete a questionnaire addressing their role during the Covid-19 pandemic. The questionnaire included items concerning: Personal and socio-demographic characteristics; Uncertainty; Personal initiative; Burnout; Professional functioning; Patient Safety and Risk Management policies and practices; Organizational functioning; and Personal Involvement in risk management activities. Qualitative data was collected by two open-ended questions.

Results: A total of 78 PSOs (67%) completed the questionnaire. The results revealed that many PSOs reduced their involvement in risk management processes or even left their position temporarily in order to return to their primary specialization as clinicians. Only 51.3% and 57.7% reported practicing risk management in the first and third waves, respectively. The three main factors that kept PSOs functioning were managerial support, mobilization of their team, and the belief in the importance of their position.

Conclusions: A crisis generates uncertainty, a plethora of frequent and urgent tasks, and the need to adapt policy to changing circumstances and to the increased risks. The risk manager must be a member of the crisis management team and participate in every important discussion in order to represent essential staff and patient safety issues and ensure that these are fully addressed already in the early stages of planning.

患者安全官员的危机管理:从Covid-19大流行中吸取的教训。
背景:对于大流行或其他危机期间医疗保健中的患者安全官员(PSOs)的角色定义,与他们的日常活动相反,尚未达成共识。本研究旨在研究大流行期间人格特质和系统因素对pso表现的贡献,并在以色列的第一波和第三波Covid-19大流行期间比较这些变量。方法:本横断面研究邀请117名pso填写一份问卷,调查他们在Covid-19大流行期间的角色。调查表包括以下项目:个人和社会人口特征;不确定性;个人主动性;倦怠的;专业的功能;患者安全和风险管理政策和做法;组织功能;亲自参与风险管理活动。定性数据通过两个开放式问题收集。结果:78名pso(67%)完成了问卷调查。结果显示,许多pso减少了他们对风险管理过程的参与,甚至暂时离开他们的职位,以便回到他们作为临床医生的主要专业。分别只有51.3%和57.7%的人报告在第一波和第三波中实施风险管理。保持pso运作的三个主要因素是管理支持、团队动员和对其职位重要性的信念。结论:危机产生了不确定性,产生了大量频繁和紧急的任务,需要调整政策以适应不断变化的环境和增加的风险。风险管理人员必须是危机管理团队的一员,并参与每一次重要的讨论,以代表基本的工作人员和患者安全问题,并确保这些问题在规划的早期阶段就得到充分解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.40%
发文量
38
审稿时长
28 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信