South African physiotherapists' attitudes to medicine prescription as an extension of practice.

IF 1 Q4 REHABILITATION
South African Journal of Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2023-06-23 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1851
Tsungirirai V Kakono, Desmond Mathye, Sarel J Brand, Werner Cordier
{"title":"South African physiotherapists' attitudes to medicine prescription as an extension of practice.","authors":"Tsungirirai V Kakono, Desmond Mathye, Sarel J Brand, Werner Cordier","doi":"10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The extension of medicine prescription rights to other healthcare providers was proposed to reduce pharmacotherapeutic service delivery challenges in the South African healthcare sector. The scope of practice of physiotherapists is being reviewed to possibly include prescription rights to promote service delivery.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our study assessed the attitudes of registered South African physiotherapists to the inclusion of prescription rights in their scope of practice, including enablers and challenges, and the drug classes they believe to be most relevant.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional descriptive survey of South African registered physiotherapists was completed using an online questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 359 participants completed the questionnaire, where 88.2% agreed that prescribing rights should be introduced, and 87.64% would want to be trained to prescribe. Participants identified several benefits: improved service delivery (91.3%); reduced healthcare delivery costs (89.8%); decreased need for multiple healthcare practitioner consultations (93.2%). Concerns included: inadequate training (55%); increased workload (18.7%); increased insurance premiums against medical liability claims (46.2%). Drugs of relevance included analgesics (95.6%) and bronchodilators (96.0%), while low preference was placed on drugs unrelated to physiotherapy. Chi-square analysis revealed associations between specific drug classes and fields of expertise.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>South African physiotherapists agree that prescribing and a limited formulary would benefit their scope of practice; however, educational concerns are evident.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Findings support the drive to extend the South African physiotherapy scope of practice, however, investigation will be needed to determine the most appropriate way to capacitate future physiotherapists and current graduates should the extension be approved.</p>","PeriodicalId":44180,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"79 1","pages":"1851"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10319926/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The extension of medicine prescription rights to other healthcare providers was proposed to reduce pharmacotherapeutic service delivery challenges in the South African healthcare sector. The scope of practice of physiotherapists is being reviewed to possibly include prescription rights to promote service delivery.

Objectives: Our study assessed the attitudes of registered South African physiotherapists to the inclusion of prescription rights in their scope of practice, including enablers and challenges, and the drug classes they believe to be most relevant.

Method: A cross-sectional descriptive survey of South African registered physiotherapists was completed using an online questionnaire.

Results: A total of 359 participants completed the questionnaire, where 88.2% agreed that prescribing rights should be introduced, and 87.64% would want to be trained to prescribe. Participants identified several benefits: improved service delivery (91.3%); reduced healthcare delivery costs (89.8%); decreased need for multiple healthcare practitioner consultations (93.2%). Concerns included: inadequate training (55%); increased workload (18.7%); increased insurance premiums against medical liability claims (46.2%). Drugs of relevance included analgesics (95.6%) and bronchodilators (96.0%), while low preference was placed on drugs unrelated to physiotherapy. Chi-square analysis revealed associations between specific drug classes and fields of expertise.

Conclusion: South African physiotherapists agree that prescribing and a limited formulary would benefit their scope of practice; however, educational concerns are evident.

Clinical implications: Findings support the drive to extend the South African physiotherapy scope of practice, however, investigation will be needed to determine the most appropriate way to capacitate future physiotherapists and current graduates should the extension be approved.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

南非物理治疗师对作为实践延伸的处方药的态度。
背景:建议将药品处方权扩展至其他医疗保健提供者,以减少南非医疗保健部门在提供药物治疗服务方面的挑战。目前正在对物理治疗师的执业范围进行审查,以便将处方权纳入其中,从而促进服务的提供:我们的研究评估了南非注册物理治疗师对将处方权纳入其执业范围的态度,包括推动因素和挑战,以及他们认为最相关的药物类别:方法:使用在线问卷对南非注册物理治疗师进行横断面描述性调查:共有 359 名参与者填写了问卷,其中 88.2% 的人同意应引入处方权,87.64% 的人希望接受处方培训。参与者指出了几种好处:改善服务提供(91.3%);降低医疗保健服务成本(89.8%);减少对多个医疗保健从业人员咨询的需求(93.2%)。顾虑包括:培训不足(55%);工作量增加(18.7%);医疗责任索赔保险费增加(46.2%)。相关药物包括镇痛剂(95.6%)和支气管扩张剂(96.0%),而与物理治疗无关的药物则不受青睐。卡方分析显示了特定药物类别与专业领域之间的关联:南非物理治疗师一致认为,处方和有限的处方集将有利于他们的实践范围;然而,教育方面的问题也显而易见:临床影响:研究结果支持扩大南非物理治疗执业范围的努力,但是,如果扩大执业范围获得批准,还需要进行调查,以确定培养未来物理治疗师和当前毕业生能力的最合适方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信