Targeted Data Quality Analysis for a Clinical Decision Support System for SIRS Detection in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Erik Tute, Marcel Mast, Antje Wulff
{"title":"Targeted Data Quality Analysis for a Clinical Decision Support System for SIRS Detection in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients.","authors":"Erik Tute,&nbsp;Marcel Mast,&nbsp;Antje Wulff","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1760238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data quality issues can cause false decisions of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs). Analyzing local data quality has the potential to prevent data quality-related failure of CDSS adoption.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To define a shareable set of applicable measurement methods (MMs) for a targeted data quality assessment determining the suitability of local data for our CDSS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We derived task-specific MMs using four approaches: (1) a GUI-based data quality analysis using the open source tool <i>openCQA</i>. (2) Analyzing cases of known false CDSS decisions. (3) Data-driven learning on MM-results. (4) A systematic check to find blind spots in our set of MMs based on the <i>HIDQF</i> data quality framework. We expressed the derived data quality-related knowledge about the CDSS using the 5-tuple-formalization for MMs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified some task-specific dataset characteristics that a targeted data quality assessment for our use case should inspect. Altogether, we defined 394 MMs organized in 13 data quality knowledge bases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have created a set of shareable, applicable MMs that can support targeted data quality assessment for CDSS-based systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) detection in critically ill, pediatric patients. With the demonstrated approaches for deriving and expressing task-specific MMs, we intend to help promoting targeted data quality assessment as a commonly recognized usual part of research on data-consuming application systems in health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":49822,"journal":{"name":"Methods of Information in Medicine","volume":"62 S 01","pages":"e1-e9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/23/e5/10-1055-s-0042-1760238.PMC10306443.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods of Information in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1760238","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Data quality issues can cause false decisions of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs). Analyzing local data quality has the potential to prevent data quality-related failure of CDSS adoption.

Objectives: To define a shareable set of applicable measurement methods (MMs) for a targeted data quality assessment determining the suitability of local data for our CDSS.

Methods: We derived task-specific MMs using four approaches: (1) a GUI-based data quality analysis using the open source tool openCQA. (2) Analyzing cases of known false CDSS decisions. (3) Data-driven learning on MM-results. (4) A systematic check to find blind spots in our set of MMs based on the HIDQF data quality framework. We expressed the derived data quality-related knowledge about the CDSS using the 5-tuple-formalization for MMs.

Results: We identified some task-specific dataset characteristics that a targeted data quality assessment for our use case should inspect. Altogether, we defined 394 MMs organized in 13 data quality knowledge bases.

Conclusions: We have created a set of shareable, applicable MMs that can support targeted data quality assessment for CDSS-based systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) detection in critically ill, pediatric patients. With the demonstrated approaches for deriving and expressing task-specific MMs, we intend to help promoting targeted data quality assessment as a commonly recognized usual part of research on data-consuming application systems in health care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

危重儿科SIRS检测临床决策支持系统的目标数据质量分析。
背景:数据质量问题可能导致临床决策支持系统(cdss)的错误决策。分析本地数据质量有可能防止采用CDSS时出现与数据质量相关的失败。目的:定义一套可共享的适用测量方法(mm),用于有针对性的数据质量评估,确定本地数据对我们CDSS的适用性。方法:我们使用四种方法推导特定于任务的mm:(1)使用开源工具openCQA进行基于gui的数据质量分析。(2)分析已知的CDSS错误决策案例。(3)基于mm结果的数据驱动学习。(4)基于HIDQF数据质量框架系统检查我们的mm集中的盲点。我们使用mm的5元形式化表达了关于CDSS的衍生数据质量相关知识。结果:我们确定了一些任务特定的数据集特征,用例的目标数据质量评估应该检查这些特征。我们总共定义了394个mm,组织在13个数据质量知识库中。结论:我们已经创建了一套可共享的、适用的mm,可以支持危重儿科患者基于cdss的系统性炎症反应综合征(SIRS)检测的目标数据质量评估。通过演示导出和表达特定任务mm的方法,我们打算帮助促进有针对性的数据质量评估,使其成为医疗保健中数据消费应用系统研究中公认的常规部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Methods of Information in Medicine
Methods of Information in Medicine 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
33
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Good medicine and good healthcare demand good information. Since the journal''s founding in 1962, Methods of Information in Medicine has stressed the methodology and scientific fundamentals of organizing, representing and analyzing data, information and knowledge in biomedicine and health care. Covering publications in the fields of biomedical and health informatics, medical biometry, and epidemiology, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, reports, opinion papers, editorials, and letters to the editor. From time to time, the journal publishes articles on particular focus themes as part of a journal''s issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信