Reliability of lower leg muscle elasticity using shear wave elastography in non-weight-bearing and weight-bearing

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
David J. Kempfert , Katy Mitchell , Wayne Brewer , Christina Bickley , Garrett Mandel
{"title":"Reliability of lower leg muscle elasticity using shear wave elastography in non-weight-bearing and weight-bearing","authors":"David J. Kempfert ,&nbsp;Katy Mitchell ,&nbsp;Wayne Brewer ,&nbsp;Christina Bickley ,&nbsp;Garrett Mandel","doi":"10.1016/j.jelekin.2023.102813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Muscle elasticity can be quantified with shear wave elastography (SWE) and has been used as an estimate of muscle force but reliability has not been established for lower leg muscles. The purpose of this study was to examine the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of elasticity measures in non-weight-bearing (NWB) and weight-bearing (WB) for the tibialis anterior (TA), tibialis posterior (TP), peroneal longus (PL), and peroneal brevis (PB) muscles using SWE.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 109 recreationally active healthy adults participated. The study employed a single-cohort, same-day repeated-measures test–retest design. Elasticity, measured in kilopascals as the Young’s modulus, was converted to the shear modulus. All four muscles were measured in NWB and at 90% WB.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Intra-rater reliability estimates were good to excellent for NWB (ICC = 0.930–0.988) and WB (ICC = 0.877–0.978) measures. Inter-rater reliability estimates were moderate to good (ICC = 0.500–0.795) for NWB measures and poor to good (ICC = 0.346–0.910) for WB measures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite the studies poor to good inter-rater variability, the intra-rater reproducibility represents the potential benefit of SWE in NWB and WB. Establishing the reliability of SWE with clinical and biomechanical approaches may aid in improved understanding of the mechanical properties of muscle.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105064112300072X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Muscle elasticity can be quantified with shear wave elastography (SWE) and has been used as an estimate of muscle force but reliability has not been established for lower leg muscles. The purpose of this study was to examine the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of elasticity measures in non-weight-bearing (NWB) and weight-bearing (WB) for the tibialis anterior (TA), tibialis posterior (TP), peroneal longus (PL), and peroneal brevis (PB) muscles using SWE.

Methods

A total of 109 recreationally active healthy adults participated. The study employed a single-cohort, same-day repeated-measures test–retest design. Elasticity, measured in kilopascals as the Young’s modulus, was converted to the shear modulus. All four muscles were measured in NWB and at 90% WB.

Results

Intra-rater reliability estimates were good to excellent for NWB (ICC = 0.930–0.988) and WB (ICC = 0.877–0.978) measures. Inter-rater reliability estimates were moderate to good (ICC = 0.500–0.795) for NWB measures and poor to good (ICC = 0.346–0.910) for WB measures.

Conclusion

Despite the studies poor to good inter-rater variability, the intra-rater reproducibility represents the potential benefit of SWE in NWB and WB. Establishing the reliability of SWE with clinical and biomechanical approaches may aid in improved understanding of the mechanical properties of muscle.

剪切波弹性成像在非承重和承重条件下小腿肌肉弹性的可靠性
目的肌肉弹性可以通过剪切波弹性成像(SWE)进行量化,并已被用作肌肉力量的估计,但小腿肌肉的可靠性尚未确定。本研究的目的是使用SWE检查胫骨前肌(TA)、胫骨后肌(TP)、腓长肌(PL)和腓短肌(PB)在非负重(NWB)和负重(WB)下弹性测量的评分者内和评分者间可靠性。该研究采用了单一队列、当天重复测量的测试-再测试设计。弹性,以千帕为单位测量为杨氏模量,转换为剪切模量。所有四块肌肉都在NWB和90%WB下进行了测量。结果NWB(ICC=0.930–0.988)和WB(ICC=0.877–0.978)测量的中位可靠性估计从好到优。NWB测量的评分者间可靠性估计值为中等至良好(ICC=0.500–0.795),WB测量的评级者间可靠性评估值为差至良好(ICC=0.346–0.910)。结论尽管研究的评分者间变异性较差,但评分者内的再现性代表了SWE在NWB和WB中的潜在益处。通过临床和生物力学方法建立SWE的可靠性可能有助于提高对肌肉力学特性的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology is the primary source for outstanding original articles on the study of human movement from muscle contraction via its motor units and sensory system to integrated motion through mechanical and electrical detection techniques. As the official publication of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology, the journal is dedicated to publishing the best work in all areas of electromyography and kinesiology, including: control of movement, muscle fatigue, muscle and nerve properties, joint biomechanics and electrical stimulation. Applications in rehabilitation, sports & exercise, motion analysis, ergonomics, alternative & complimentary medicine, measures of human performance and technical articles on electromyographic signal processing are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信