The instrumental Brahmin and the "half-caste" computer: Astronomy and colonial rule in Madras, 1791-1835.

IF 1.1 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
S Prashant Kumar
{"title":"The instrumental Brahmin and the \"half-caste\" computer: Astronomy and colonial rule in Madras, 1791-1835.","authors":"S Prashant Kumar","doi":"10.1177/00732753221090435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>What did science make possible for colonial rule? How was science in turn marked by the knowledge and practices of those under colonial rule? Here I approach these questions via the social history of Madras Observatory. Constructed in 1791 by the East India Company, the observatory was to provide local time to mariners and served as a clearinghouse for the company's survey and revenue administration. The astronomical work of Madras' Brahmin assistants relied upon their knowledge of <i>jyotiśāstra</i> [Sanskrit astronomy/astrology], and can be seen as a specialized form of the kind of South Indian scribal labor and knowledge that also staffed the company's tax offices. If at Greenwich the division of labor meant observatory work bore resemblances to the factory and the accounts office, in Madras, astronomy and accounting drew on similar labor forms because they were part of the same enterprise. But the company did not just adapt preexisting forms of labor, it also attempted to produce its own at a school built near the observatory to train \"half-caste\" orphans as apprentice surveyors and assistant computers. The school, staffed by the Brahmins, drew upon knowledge and pedagogical practice associated with the <i>tinnai</i>, the schools in which upper-caste children learned to read, write, and calculate. For a time, the observatory's social order was literally \"half-caste.\" The paper also considers how the relationship between caste, status, and instrument was reflected in the visual and material culture of the observatory, such as in Indian-language inscriptions on its central pillar. For company astronomers, the measurement of time meant reworking the relationships among the Indian past, the colonial present, and an imperial posterity. Science under colonial rule spanned multiple temporal and social registers because it was the result of negotiations between the demands of political economy and the knowledge and practices of colonized others.</p>","PeriodicalId":50404,"journal":{"name":"History of Science","volume":"61 3","pages":"308-337"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10466975/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00732753221090435","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

What did science make possible for colonial rule? How was science in turn marked by the knowledge and practices of those under colonial rule? Here I approach these questions via the social history of Madras Observatory. Constructed in 1791 by the East India Company, the observatory was to provide local time to mariners and served as a clearinghouse for the company's survey and revenue administration. The astronomical work of Madras' Brahmin assistants relied upon their knowledge of jyotiśāstra [Sanskrit astronomy/astrology], and can be seen as a specialized form of the kind of South Indian scribal labor and knowledge that also staffed the company's tax offices. If at Greenwich the division of labor meant observatory work bore resemblances to the factory and the accounts office, in Madras, astronomy and accounting drew on similar labor forms because they were part of the same enterprise. But the company did not just adapt preexisting forms of labor, it also attempted to produce its own at a school built near the observatory to train "half-caste" orphans as apprentice surveyors and assistant computers. The school, staffed by the Brahmins, drew upon knowledge and pedagogical practice associated with the tinnai, the schools in which upper-caste children learned to read, write, and calculate. For a time, the observatory's social order was literally "half-caste." The paper also considers how the relationship between caste, status, and instrument was reflected in the visual and material culture of the observatory, such as in Indian-language inscriptions on its central pillar. For company astronomers, the measurement of time meant reworking the relationships among the Indian past, the colonial present, and an imperial posterity. Science under colonial rule spanned multiple temporal and social registers because it was the result of negotiations between the demands of political economy and the knowledge and practices of colonized others.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

工具性的婆罗门和“半种姓”计算机:天文学和马德拉斯的殖民统治,1791-1835。
科学使殖民统治成为可能的是什么?殖民统治下的人们的知识和实践又如何反过来标志着科学?在这里,我通过马德拉斯天文台的社会历史来探讨这些问题。这座天文台建于1791年,由东印度公司建造,目的是为海员提供当地时间,并作为公司调查和税收管理的信息交换中心。马德拉斯婆罗门助手的天文学工作依赖于他们对jyotiśāstra(梵语天文学/占星术)的知识,可以看作是南印度文士的一种专门形式的劳动和知识,也为公司的税务办公室提供人员。如果说在格林尼治,劳动分工意味着天文台的工作类似于工厂和会计事务所,那么在马德拉斯,天文学和会计学就采用了类似的劳动形式,因为它们是同一企业的一部分。但该公司不仅采用了现有的劳动力形式,还试图在天文台附近建造的一所学校里生产自己的劳动力,以培训“半种姓”孤儿成为学徒测量师和助理计算机。这所由婆罗门教工的学校借鉴了与“廷奈”(tinnai)有关的知识和教学实践。“廷奈”是上层种姓儿童学习阅读、写作和计算的学校。有一段时间,天文台的社会秩序实际上是“半种姓”。本文还考虑了种姓、地位和仪器之间的关系如何反映在天文台的视觉和物质文化中,例如在其中心柱子上的印度语铭文。对于公司的天文学家来说,时间的测量意味着重新研究印度过去、殖民地现在和帝国后代之间的关系。殖民统治下的科学跨越了多个时间和社会范围,因为它是政治经济需求与被殖民他人的知识和实践之间谈判的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
History of Science
History of Science 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: History of Science is peer reviewed journal devoted to the history of science, medicine and technology from earliest times to the present day. Articles discussing methodology, and reviews of the current state of knowledge and possibilities for future research, are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信