Eline Lima Borges, Gilmara Lopes Amorim, Marina Barcelos de Miranda, Flaviano Dos Santos Martins, Antônio Carlos Martins Guedes, Kinulpe Honorato Sampaio, Josimare Aparecida Otoni Spira, Lucíola da Silva Barcelos
{"title":"Biofilm model on mice skin wounds.","authors":"Eline Lima Borges, Gilmara Lopes Amorim, Marina Barcelos de Miranda, Flaviano Dos Santos Martins, Antônio Carlos Martins Guedes, Kinulpe Honorato Sampaio, Josimare Aparecida Otoni Spira, Lucíola da Silva Barcelos","doi":"10.1590/acb370306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate a biofilm model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in excisional cutaneous wound in mice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Preclinical, translational study conducted with 64 C57BL/6 mice randomly assigned to control and intervention groups. Evaluation was on days D0, D3, D5, D7 and D10 of wound making. The profile of biofilm formation and induction was evaluated using wound closure kinetics, quantitative culture, and evaluation of wounds using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Clinical evaluation was performed by liver tissue culture, weight variation, and quantification of leukocytes in peripheral blood. Analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bacterial load for induction of infection with P. aeruginosa and survival of animals was 104 UFC·mL-1. In D5 (p < 0.0001) and D7 (p < 0.01), animals in the intervention group showed a delay in the healing process and had their wounds covered by necrotic tissue until D10. Statistical differences were observed in wound cultures and weight at D5 and D7 (p < 0.01). Liver cultures and leukocyte quantification showed no statistical differences. No bacteria in planktonic or biofilm form were identified by TEM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings raise questions about the understanding of the ease of formation and high occurrence of biofilm in chronic wounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":6992,"journal":{"name":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","volume":"37 3","pages":"e370306"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9161625/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/acb370306","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate a biofilm model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in excisional cutaneous wound in mice.
Methods: Preclinical, translational study conducted with 64 C57BL/6 mice randomly assigned to control and intervention groups. Evaluation was on days D0, D3, D5, D7 and D10 of wound making. The profile of biofilm formation and induction was evaluated using wound closure kinetics, quantitative culture, and evaluation of wounds using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Clinical evaluation was performed by liver tissue culture, weight variation, and quantification of leukocytes in peripheral blood. Analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism software.
Results: Bacterial load for induction of infection with P. aeruginosa and survival of animals was 104 UFC·mL-1. In D5 (p < 0.0001) and D7 (p < 0.01), animals in the intervention group showed a delay in the healing process and had their wounds covered by necrotic tissue until D10. Statistical differences were observed in wound cultures and weight at D5 and D7 (p < 0.01). Liver cultures and leukocyte quantification showed no statistical differences. No bacteria in planktonic or biofilm form were identified by TEM.
Conclusions: The findings raise questions about the understanding of the ease of formation and high occurrence of biofilm in chronic wounds.