Implementation and Evaluation of Primary Care Team Participation in Opioid Use Disorder Learning Sessions.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Cory Lutgen, Elisabeth Callen, Elise Robertson, Tarin Clay, Melissa K Filippi
{"title":"Implementation and Evaluation of Primary Care Team Participation in Opioid Use Disorder Learning Sessions.","authors":"Cory Lutgen,&nbsp;Elisabeth Callen,&nbsp;Elise Robertson,&nbsp;Tarin Clay,&nbsp;Melissa K Filippi","doi":"10.1177/08897077231174675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Previous studies show that some primary care clinicians do not feel equipped to treat patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). This study addressed the gaps in confidence and knowledge of primary care physicians and other participants (i.e., participants who were not physicians) in diagnosing, treating, prescribing, and educating patients with OUD through interactive learning sessions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network held monthly OUD learning sessions from September 2021 to March 2022 with physicians and other participants (n = 31) from 7 practices. Participants took baseline (n = 31), post-session (n = 11-20), and post-intervention (n = 21) surveys. Questions focused on confidence, knowledge, among others. We used non-parametric tests to compare individual responses pre-versus-post participation as well as to compare responses between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All participants experienced significant changes in confidence and knowledge for most topics covered in the series. When comparing physicians to other participants, physicians had greater increases in confidence in dosing and monitoring for diversion (<i>P</i> = .047), but other participants had greater increases in confidence in the majority of topic areas. Physicians also had greater increases in knowledge than other participants in dosing and monitoring for safety (<i>P</i> = .033) and dosing and monitoring for diversion (<i>P</i> = .024), whereas other participants had greater increases in knowledge in most remaining topics. Participants agreed that sessions provided practical knowledge, except for relevancy of the case study portion of the session to current practice (<i>P</i> = .023) and the session improved participant ability to care for patients (<i>P</i> = .044).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Through participating in interactive OUD learning sessions, knowledge and confidence increased among physicians and other participants. These changes may impact participants' decisions to diagnose, treat, prescribe, and educate patients with OUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":22108,"journal":{"name":"Substance abuse","volume":"44 1","pages":"51-61"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance abuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08897077231174675","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Previous studies show that some primary care clinicians do not feel equipped to treat patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). This study addressed the gaps in confidence and knowledge of primary care physicians and other participants (i.e., participants who were not physicians) in diagnosing, treating, prescribing, and educating patients with OUD through interactive learning sessions.

Methods: The American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network held monthly OUD learning sessions from September 2021 to March 2022 with physicians and other participants (n = 31) from 7 practices. Participants took baseline (n = 31), post-session (n = 11-20), and post-intervention (n = 21) surveys. Questions focused on confidence, knowledge, among others. We used non-parametric tests to compare individual responses pre-versus-post participation as well as to compare responses between groups.

Results: All participants experienced significant changes in confidence and knowledge for most topics covered in the series. When comparing physicians to other participants, physicians had greater increases in confidence in dosing and monitoring for diversion (P = .047), but other participants had greater increases in confidence in the majority of topic areas. Physicians also had greater increases in knowledge than other participants in dosing and monitoring for safety (P = .033) and dosing and monitoring for diversion (P = .024), whereas other participants had greater increases in knowledge in most remaining topics. Participants agreed that sessions provided practical knowledge, except for relevancy of the case study portion of the session to current practice (P = .023) and the session improved participant ability to care for patients (P = .044).

Conclusion: Through participating in interactive OUD learning sessions, knowledge and confidence increased among physicians and other participants. These changes may impact participants' decisions to diagnose, treat, prescribe, and educate patients with OUD.

初级保健团队参与阿片类药物使用障碍学习课程的实施和评估。
先前的研究表明,一些初级保健临床医生认为自己没有能力治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者。本研究通过互动式学习课程解决了初级保健医生和其他参与者(即非医生参与者)在诊断、治疗、开处方和教育OUD患者方面的信心和知识差距。方法:美国家庭医生学会国家研究网络于2021年9月至2022年3月每月与来自7个实践的医生和其他参与者(n = 31)举行OUD学习会议。参与者接受了基线调查(n = 31)、治疗后调查(n = 11-20)和干预后调查(n = 21)。问题集中在信心、知识等方面。我们使用非参数测试来比较参与前后的个人反应,以及比较组间的反应。结果:所有参与者在信心和知识方面都经历了显著的变化。当比较医生和其他参与者时,医生在给药和转移监测方面有更大的信心增加(P = 0.047),但其他参与者在大多数主题领域有更大的信心增加。医生在给药和安全监测(P = 0.033)和分流给药和监测(P = 0.024)方面的知识也比其他参与者有更大的增加,而其他参与者在大多数其余主题的知识也有更大的增加。参与者同意课程提供了实用知识,除了课程的案例研究部分与当前实践的相关性(P = 0.023)和课程提高了参与者照顾患者的能力(P = 0.044)。结论:通过参与交互式OUD学习课程,医生和其他参与者的知识和信心都有所增加。这些变化可能会影响参与者对OUD患者的诊断、治疗、处方和教育的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Substance abuse
Substance abuse SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
88
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its 4th decade of publication, Substance Abuse journal is a peer-reviewed journal that serves as the official publication of Association for Medical Education and Research in Substance Abuse (AMERSA) in association with The International Society of Addiction Medicine (ISAM) and the International Coalition for Addiction Studies in Education (INCASE). Substance Abuse journal offers wide-ranging coverage for healthcare professionals, addiction specialists and others engaged in research, education, clinical care, and service delivery and evaluation. It features articles on a variety of topics, including: Interdisciplinary addiction research, education, and treatment Clinical trial, epidemiology, health services, and translation addiction research Implementation science related to addiction Innovations and subsequent outcomes in addiction education Addiction policy and opinion International addiction topics Clinical care regarding addictions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信