Physicians' perspectives on different therapeutic approaches for aluminum phosphide poisoning and their relevant outcomes.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY
Toxicology Research Pub Date : 2023-07-03 eCollection Date: 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1093/toxres/tfad053
Zahraa K Sobh, Maha Ghanem, Marwa Kholief
{"title":"Physicians' perspectives on different therapeutic approaches for aluminum phosphide poisoning and their relevant outcomes.","authors":"Zahraa K Sobh, Maha Ghanem, Marwa Kholief","doi":"10.1093/toxres/tfad053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aluminum phosphide is a highly toxic pesticide that results in high mortality. To date, there is neither a definitive antidote nor a unified protocol for managing acute aluminum phosphide poisoning.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This cross-sectional questionnaire-based study aims to explore different management approaches and rely on the expertise of Egyptian medical professionals to enhance the prognosis for acute aluminum phosphide poisoning.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>A self-administered questionnaire was formulated and electronically distributed according to published literature and experience of senior physicians.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>Responses were received from 151 physicians from 10 governorates. Management modalities were variable among respondents. Noradrenaline was used by 90.7% of respondents with no fixed-dose regimen. In all, 84.1% of participants utilized oil in gastrointestinal decontamination; paraffin oil was the most used solution. Overall, 92.1, 61.6, 46.4, and 34.4% of participants used sodium bicarbonate, proton pump inhibitors, IV magnesium sulfate, and antioxidants, respectively. Regarding the frequency of acute aluminum phosphide poisoning, 47% of participants managed these cases daily or a few times a week. Participants' responses denoted a poor prognosis of acute aluminum phosphide poisoning, and high percentages attributed the prognosis to exposure factors rather than treatment modalities. Statistical analysis revealed that using oil in gastrointestinal decontamination improved the outcome by 4.62-fold. Clinical toxicologists were more likely to rescue ≥ 30% of the cases about 3-fold (2.97) than other specialties. Clinical toxicologists used oil in gastrointestinal decontamination, magnesium sulfate, and antioxidant therapy and calculated base deficit before administration of sodium bicarbonate by 7.70-, 5.30-, 3.26-, and 2.08-fold than other specialties.</p>","PeriodicalId":105,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology Research","volume":"12 4","pages":"615-625"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10470372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxres/tfad053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Aluminum phosphide is a highly toxic pesticide that results in high mortality. To date, there is neither a definitive antidote nor a unified protocol for managing acute aluminum phosphide poisoning.

Objectives: This cross-sectional questionnaire-based study aims to explore different management approaches and rely on the expertise of Egyptian medical professionals to enhance the prognosis for acute aluminum phosphide poisoning.

Subjects and methods: A self-administered questionnaire was formulated and electronically distributed according to published literature and experience of senior physicians.

Results and conclusions: Responses were received from 151 physicians from 10 governorates. Management modalities were variable among respondents. Noradrenaline was used by 90.7% of respondents with no fixed-dose regimen. In all, 84.1% of participants utilized oil in gastrointestinal decontamination; paraffin oil was the most used solution. Overall, 92.1, 61.6, 46.4, and 34.4% of participants used sodium bicarbonate, proton pump inhibitors, IV magnesium sulfate, and antioxidants, respectively. Regarding the frequency of acute aluminum phosphide poisoning, 47% of participants managed these cases daily or a few times a week. Participants' responses denoted a poor prognosis of acute aluminum phosphide poisoning, and high percentages attributed the prognosis to exposure factors rather than treatment modalities. Statistical analysis revealed that using oil in gastrointestinal decontamination improved the outcome by 4.62-fold. Clinical toxicologists were more likely to rescue ≥ 30% of the cases about 3-fold (2.97) than other specialties. Clinical toxicologists used oil in gastrointestinal decontamination, magnesium sulfate, and antioxidant therapy and calculated base deficit before administration of sodium bicarbonate by 7.70-, 5.30-, 3.26-, and 2.08-fold than other specialties.

医生对磷化铝中毒的不同治疗方法及其相关结果的看法。
背景:磷化铝是一种剧毒农药,死亡率很高。迄今为止,既没有明确的解毒剂,也没有处理急性磷化铝中毒的统一方案:这项以问卷调查为基础的横断面研究旨在探索不同的处理方法,并依靠埃及医疗专业人员的专业知识来改善急性磷化铝中毒的预后:根据已发表的文献和资深医生的经验,制定了一份自填式问卷,并以电子方式分发:共收到来自 10 个省 151 名医生的回复。受访者的处理方式各不相同。90.7%的受访者使用去甲肾上腺素,但没有固定剂量方案。总之,84.1% 的参与者使用油类进行胃肠道净化;石蜡油是使用最多的溶液。总体而言,分别有 92.1%、61.6%、46.4% 和 34.4% 的参与者使用碳酸氢钠、质子泵抑制剂、静脉注射硫酸镁和抗氧化剂。关于急性磷化铝中毒的频率,47% 的参与者每天或每周处理几次。参与者的回答表明急性磷化铝中毒的预后较差,将预后归因于接触因素而非治疗方法的比例较高。统计分析表明,在胃肠道去污过程中使用油会将预后提高 4.62 倍。与其他专业相比,临床毒理学家更有可能抢救出≥ 30% 的病例,约为其他专业的 3 倍(2.97)。临床毒理学家在胃肠道净化、硫酸镁和抗氧化疗法中使用油类,并在使用碳酸氢钠之前计算出碱度不足的比例分别是其他专业的 7.70 倍、5.30 倍、3.26 倍和 2.08 倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Toxicology Research
Toxicology Research TOXICOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: A multi-disciplinary journal covering the best research in both fundamental and applied aspects of toxicology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信