High-flow via a tracheostomy tube and speaking valve during weaning from mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-12 DOI:10.1111/aas.14305
Peter H Egbers, Anna-Liisa Sutt, Jenny E Petersson, Liza Bergström, Eva Sundman
{"title":"High-flow via a tracheostomy tube and speaking valve during weaning from mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy.","authors":"Peter H Egbers,&nbsp;Anna-Liisa Sutt,&nbsp;Jenny E Petersson,&nbsp;Liza Bergström,&nbsp;Eva Sundman","doi":"10.1111/aas.14305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Weaning from mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy after prolonged intensive care consume enormous resources with optimal management not currently well described. Restoration of respiratory flow via the upper airway is essential and early cuff-deflation using a one-way valve (OWV) is recommended. However, extended OWV use may cause dry airways and thickened secretions which challenge the weaning process. High-flow therapy via the tracheostomy tube (HFT-T) humidifies inspired air and may be connected via an in-line OWV (HFT-T-OWV) alleviating these problems. We aim to provide clinical and experimental data on the safety of HFT-T-OWV along with a practical guide to facilitate clinical use during weaning from mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on adverse events of HFT-T-OWV were retrieved from a quality register for patients treated at an intensive care rehabilitation center between 2019 and 2022. Benchtop experiments were performed to measure maximum pressures and pressure support generated by HFT-T-OWV at 25-60 L/min flow using two different HFT-T adapters (interfaces). In simulated airway obstruction using a standard OWV (not in-line) maximum pressures were measured with oxygen delivered via the side port at 1-3 L/min.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 128 tracheostomized patients who underwent weaning attempts, 124 were treated with HFT-T-OWV. The therapy was well tolerated, and no adverse events related to the practice were detected. The main reason for not using HFT-T-OWV was partial upper airway obstruction using a OWV. Benchtop experiments demonstrated HFT-T-OWV maximum pressures <4 cmH<sub>2</sub> O and pressure support 0-0.6 cmH<sub>2</sub> O. In contrast, 1-3 L/min supplemental oxygen via a standard OWV caused pressures between 84 and 148 cmH<sub>2</sub> O during simulated airway obstruction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current study clinical data and benchtop experiments indicate that HFT-T-OWV was well tolerated and appeared safe. Pressure support was low, but humidification may enable extended use of a OWV without dry airway mucosa and thickened secretions. Results suggest the treatment could offer advantages to standard OWV use, with or without supplementary oxygen, as well as to HFT-T without a OWV, for weaning from mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy. However, for definitive treatment recommendations, randomized clinical trials are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":"1403-1413"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Weaning from mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy after prolonged intensive care consume enormous resources with optimal management not currently well described. Restoration of respiratory flow via the upper airway is essential and early cuff-deflation using a one-way valve (OWV) is recommended. However, extended OWV use may cause dry airways and thickened secretions which challenge the weaning process. High-flow therapy via the tracheostomy tube (HFT-T) humidifies inspired air and may be connected via an in-line OWV (HFT-T-OWV) alleviating these problems. We aim to provide clinical and experimental data on the safety of HFT-T-OWV along with a practical guide to facilitate clinical use during weaning from mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy.

Methods: Data on adverse events of HFT-T-OWV were retrieved from a quality register for patients treated at an intensive care rehabilitation center between 2019 and 2022. Benchtop experiments were performed to measure maximum pressures and pressure support generated by HFT-T-OWV at 25-60 L/min flow using two different HFT-T adapters (interfaces). In simulated airway obstruction using a standard OWV (not in-line) maximum pressures were measured with oxygen delivered via the side port at 1-3 L/min.

Results: Of 128 tracheostomized patients who underwent weaning attempts, 124 were treated with HFT-T-OWV. The therapy was well tolerated, and no adverse events related to the practice were detected. The main reason for not using HFT-T-OWV was partial upper airway obstruction using a OWV. Benchtop experiments demonstrated HFT-T-OWV maximum pressures <4 cmH2 O and pressure support 0-0.6 cmH2 O. In contrast, 1-3 L/min supplemental oxygen via a standard OWV caused pressures between 84 and 148 cmH2 O during simulated airway obstruction.

Conclusions: Current study clinical data and benchtop experiments indicate that HFT-T-OWV was well tolerated and appeared safe. Pressure support was low, but humidification may enable extended use of a OWV without dry airway mucosa and thickened secretions. Results suggest the treatment could offer advantages to standard OWV use, with or without supplementary oxygen, as well as to HFT-T without a OWV, for weaning from mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy. However, for definitive treatment recommendations, randomized clinical trials are needed.

在机械通气和气管造口术后断奶期间,通过气管造口管和通气阀的高流量。
背景:长期重症监护后的机械通气和气管切开断奶消耗了巨大的资源,目前尚未很好地描述最佳管理。通过上呼吸道恢复呼吸流量至关重要,建议尽早使用单向阀(OWV)进行袖带放气。然而,长期使用OWV可能会导致气道干燥和分泌物增厚,这对断奶过程构成了挑战。通过气管造口管(HFT-T)的高流量治疗加湿吸入的空气,并且可以通过在线OWV(HFT-T-OWV)连接,从而缓解这些问题。我们的目的是提供关于HFT-T-OWV安全性的临床和实验数据,以及一份实用指南,以促进机械通气和气管造口术断奶期间的临床使用。方法:从2019年至2022年间在重症监护康复中心接受治疗的患者的质量登记册中检索HFT-T-OWV不良事件的数据。进行Benchtop实验以测量HFT-T-OWV在25-60时产生的最大压力和压力支持 使用两个不同的HFT-T适配器(接口)的L/min流量。在使用标准OWV(非直列式)的模拟气道阻塞中,在1-3时通过侧端口输送氧气时测量最大压力 结果:在128例尝试断奶的气管造口患者中,124例接受了HFT-T-OWV治疗。该疗法耐受性良好,未发现与该实践相关的不良事件。不使用HFT-T-OWV的主要原因是使用OWV的部分上呼吸道阻塞。Benchtop实验证明HFT-T-OWV最大压力为2 O,压力支持为0-0.6 cmH2 O。相反,1-3 在模拟气道阻塞期间,通过标准OWV的L/分钟补充氧气导致84和148 cmH2 O之间的压力。结论:目前的研究临床数据和台式实验表明,HFT-T-OWV具有良好的耐受性和安全性。压力支持较低,但增湿可能使OWV能够在没有干燥气道粘膜和增厚分泌物的情况下长期使用。结果表明,对于脱离机械通气和气管造口术的患者,无论是否使用补充氧气的标准OWV,以及不使用OWV的HFT-T,该治疗都有优势。然而,对于明确的治疗建议,需要进行随机临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信