The Child's Right to Know Versus the Parents' Right Not to Tell: The Attitudes of Couples Undergoing Fertility Treatments Towards Identity-Release Gamete Donation.

Q2 Medicine
Douglas Oliveira Rocha, Rose Marie Massaro Melamed, Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga, Amanada Souza Setti, Assumpto Iaconelli, Edson Borges
{"title":"The Child's Right to Know Versus the Parents' Right Not to Tell: The Attitudes of Couples Undergoing Fertility Treatments Towards Identity-Release Gamete Donation.","authors":"Douglas Oliveira Rocha, Rose Marie Massaro Melamed, Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga, Amanada Souza Setti, Assumpto Iaconelli, Edson Borges","doi":"10.18502/jri.v24i3.13276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Brazil, donor anonymity is mandatory; however, the tendency of Brazilians towards the practice is unknown. In this study, an attempt was made to investigate whether couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) have a different perception of anonymous versus identity-release gamete donation than a target population in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was performed from September 1, 2020 to December 15, 2020. For that purpose, surveys through online platforms were conducted, including either patients undergoing ART (ART-group, n=400) or subjects interested in the theme (interested-group, n=100) randomized by age at a 1:4 ratio. The survey collected information on the participants' attitudes towards anonymity of gamete donors, and answers were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants stated that the relationship between children and their parents would be affected by the child's knowledge of the origin of its conception. Most participants in the ART-group believed that the gamete donor's identity should not be revealed to the child, while only half of the interested-group stated the same. Most of the participants stated that \"the donor's identity should be revealed if the child questions its biological origin\". \"From birth\" was the second most common response, while \"when the child turns 18 years old\" and \"sometime during teenage years\" were less common answers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The attitudes of ART patients about anonymity are conservative, with most participants believing that family relationships may be affected if the child is aware of the origin of his/her conception. These patients also believe that the identity of the gamete donor should not be revealed to the child.</p>","PeriodicalId":38826,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reproduction and Infertility","volume":"24 3","pages":"198-205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10471945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reproduction and Infertility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jri.v24i3.13276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Brazil, donor anonymity is mandatory; however, the tendency of Brazilians towards the practice is unknown. In this study, an attempt was made to investigate whether couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) have a different perception of anonymous versus identity-release gamete donation than a target population in Brazil.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed from September 1, 2020 to December 15, 2020. For that purpose, surveys through online platforms were conducted, including either patients undergoing ART (ART-group, n=400) or subjects interested in the theme (interested-group, n=100) randomized by age at a 1:4 ratio. The survey collected information on the participants' attitudes towards anonymity of gamete donors, and answers were compared between the groups.

Results: Most participants stated that the relationship between children and their parents would be affected by the child's knowledge of the origin of its conception. Most participants in the ART-group believed that the gamete donor's identity should not be revealed to the child, while only half of the interested-group stated the same. Most of the participants stated that "the donor's identity should be revealed if the child questions its biological origin". "From birth" was the second most common response, while "when the child turns 18 years old" and "sometime during teenage years" were less common answers.

Conclusion: The attitudes of ART patients about anonymity are conservative, with most participants believing that family relationships may be affected if the child is aware of the origin of his/her conception. These patients also believe that the identity of the gamete donor should not be revealed to the child.

孩子的知情权与父母的不知情权:接受生育治疗的夫妇对身份释放游戏捐赠的态度。
背景:在巴西,捐助者必须匿名;然而,巴西人对这种做法的倾向是未知的。在这项研究中,试图调查接受辅助生殖技术(ART)的夫妇对匿名和身份释放配子捐赠的看法是否与巴西的目标人群不同。方法:本横断面研究于2020年9月1日至2020年12月15日进行。为此,通过在线平台进行了调查,包括接受抗逆转录病毒疗法的患者(抗逆转录病毒治疗组,n=400)或对该主题感兴趣的受试者(感兴趣组,n=100),按1:4的比例按年龄随机分组。该调查收集了参与者对配子捐献者匿名的态度信息,并对各组的答案进行了比较。结果:大多数参与者表示,儿童与父母之间的关系会受到儿童对其受孕起源的了解的影响。ART组的大多数参与者认为不应该向孩子透露配子捐献者的身份,而只有一半的感兴趣的小组表示同样的看法。大多数与会者表示,“如果儿童质疑其生物学来源,则应披露捐赠者的身份”。“从出生起”是第二常见的回答,而“当孩子年满18岁时”和“在青少年时期的某个时候”则不太常见。结论:ART患者对匿名的态度是保守的,大多数参与者认为,如果孩子知道自己受孕的来源,家庭关系可能会受到影响。这些患者还认为,配子捐献者的身份不应该透露给孩子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Reproduction and Infertility
Journal of Reproduction and Infertility Medicine-Reproductive Medicine
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信