Efficacy and safety of tonic motor activation (TOMAC) for medication-refractory restless legs syndrome: a randomized clinical trial.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sleep Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI:10.1093/sleep/zsad190
Richard K Bogan, Asim Roy, Jerrold Kram, Joseph Ojile, Russell Rosenberg, J Douglas Hudson, H Samuel Scheuller, John W Winkelman, Jonathan D Charlesworth
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of tonic motor activation (TOMAC) for medication-refractory restless legs syndrome: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Richard K Bogan,&nbsp;Asim Roy,&nbsp;Jerrold Kram,&nbsp;Joseph Ojile,&nbsp;Russell Rosenberg,&nbsp;J Douglas Hudson,&nbsp;H Samuel Scheuller,&nbsp;John W Winkelman,&nbsp;Jonathan D Charlesworth","doi":"10.1093/sleep/zsad190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety/tolerability of bilateral high-frequency tonic motor activation (TOMAC) in patients with medication-refractory restless legs syndrome (RLS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RESTFUL was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial in adults with medication-refractory moderate-to-severe primary RLS. Participants were randomized 1:1 to active or sham TOMAC for a double-blind, 4-week stage 1 and all received active TOMAC during open-label, 4-week stage 2. The primary endpoint was the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) responder rate at the end of stage 1. Key secondary endpoints included change to International RLS Study Group (IRLS) total score from study entry to the end of stage 1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 133 participants were enrolled. CGI-I responder rate at the end of stage 1 was significantly greater for the active versus sham group (45% vs. 16%; Difference = 28%; 95% CI 14% to 43%; p = .00011). At the end of stage 2, CGI-I responder rate further increased to 61% for the active group. IRLS change at the end of stage 1 improved for the active versus sham group (-7.2 vs. -3.8; difference = -3.4; 95% CI -1.4 to -5.4; p = .00093). There were no severe or serious device-related adverse events (AEs). The most common AEs were mild discomfort and mild administration site irritation which resolved rapidly and reduced in prevalence over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TOMAC was safe, well tolerated, and reduced symptoms of RLS in medication-refractory patients. TOMAC is a promising new treatment for this population.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial: </strong>Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Medication-Refractory Primary RLS (The RESTFUL Study); clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04874155; Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier number NCT04874155.</p>","PeriodicalId":49514,"journal":{"name":"Sleep","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10566236/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsad190","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Study objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety/tolerability of bilateral high-frequency tonic motor activation (TOMAC) in patients with medication-refractory restless legs syndrome (RLS).

Methods: RESTFUL was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial in adults with medication-refractory moderate-to-severe primary RLS. Participants were randomized 1:1 to active or sham TOMAC for a double-blind, 4-week stage 1 and all received active TOMAC during open-label, 4-week stage 2. The primary endpoint was the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) responder rate at the end of stage 1. Key secondary endpoints included change to International RLS Study Group (IRLS) total score from study entry to the end of stage 1.

Results: A total of 133 participants were enrolled. CGI-I responder rate at the end of stage 1 was significantly greater for the active versus sham group (45% vs. 16%; Difference = 28%; 95% CI 14% to 43%; p = .00011). At the end of stage 2, CGI-I responder rate further increased to 61% for the active group. IRLS change at the end of stage 1 improved for the active versus sham group (-7.2 vs. -3.8; difference = -3.4; 95% CI -1.4 to -5.4; p = .00093). There were no severe or serious device-related adverse events (AEs). The most common AEs were mild discomfort and mild administration site irritation which resolved rapidly and reduced in prevalence over time.

Conclusions: TOMAC was safe, well tolerated, and reduced symptoms of RLS in medication-refractory patients. TOMAC is a promising new treatment for this population.

Clinical trial: Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Medication-Refractory Primary RLS (The RESTFUL Study); clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04874155; Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier number NCT04874155.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

强直性运动激活(TOMAC)治疗难治性不宁腿综合征的疗效和安全性:一项随机临床试验。
研究目的:本研究旨在评估双侧高频强直性运动激活(TOMAC)治疗药物难治性不宁腿综合征(RLS)患者的疗效和安全性/耐受性。参与者被1:1随机分为活性或假TOMAC,进行双盲、4周的第1阶段,所有参与者在开放标签、4周第2阶段接受活性TOMAC。主要终点是第1阶段结束时的临床总体印象改善(CGI-I)应答率。主要次要终点包括从研究开始到第1阶段结束国际RLS研究组(IRLS)总分的变化。结果:共有133名参与者入选。活动组与假手术组在第1阶段结束时的CGI-I应答率显著高于假手术组(45%对16%;差异=28%;95%CI 14%-43%;p=0.000011)。在第2阶段结束时,活动组的CGI-I应答率进一步增加到61%。活动组与假手术组在第1阶段结束时的IRLS变化有所改善(-7.2vs.-3.8;差异=-3.4;95%CI-1.4--5.4;p=0.0093)。没有严重或严重的器械相关不良事件(AE)。最常见的AE是轻微的不适和轻微的给药部位刺激,这些症状迅速缓解,并随着时间的推移发病率降低。结论:TOMAC对药物难治性RLS患者安全、耐受性好、症状减轻。TOMAC是一种很有前景的新治疗方法。临床试验:无创外周神经刺激治疗药物难治性原发性RLS(RESTFUL研究);clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04874155;在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,识别号为NCT04874155。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sleep
Sleep 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1134
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: SLEEP® publishes findings from studies conducted at any level of analysis, including: Genes Molecules Cells Physiology Neural systems and circuits Behavior and cognition Self-report SLEEP® publishes articles that use a wide variety of scientific approaches and address a broad range of topics. These may include, but are not limited to: Basic and neuroscience studies of sleep and circadian mechanisms In vitro and animal models of sleep, circadian rhythms, and human disorders Pre-clinical human investigations, including the measurement and manipulation of sleep and circadian rhythms Studies in clinical or population samples. These may address factors influencing sleep and circadian rhythms (e.g., development and aging, and social and environmental influences) and relationships between sleep, circadian rhythms, health, and disease Clinical trials, epidemiology studies, implementation, and dissemination research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信