Learning and achievement characteristics of sheltered homeless population subgroups.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Carol S North, Melissa Black, Sheila Gokul, David E Pollio, Faith M Scofield, Paul J Handal, Barry A Hong
{"title":"Learning and achievement characteristics of sheltered homeless population subgroups.","authors":"Carol S North,&nbsp;Melissa Black,&nbsp;Sheila Gokul,&nbsp;David E Pollio,&nbsp;Faith M Scofield,&nbsp;Paul J Handal,&nbsp;Barry A Hong","doi":"10.12788/acp.0108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is little systematic information about intelligence and academic achievement among sheltered homeless adults. This study adds descriptive data on intelligence and academic achievement, examines discrepancies across these concepts, and explores the associations among demographic and psychosocial characteristics in the context of intelligence categories and discrepancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied intelligence, academic achievement, and discrepancies between IQ and academic achievement among 188 individuals experiencing homelessness who were systematically recruited from a large, urban, 24-hour homeless recovery center. Participants completed structured interviews, urine drug testing, the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, and the Wide Range Achievement Test, 4th edition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average full-scale intelligence was low average (90) but higher than scores obtained in other studies of homeless populations. Academic achievement was lower than average (82 to 88). Performance/math deficits in the higher intelligence group indicate functional difficulties that could have contributed to homeless risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The low-normal intelligence and below-average achievement scores are not extreme enough to warrant immediate attention and intervention for most individuals. Systematic screening during entry into homeless services might identify learning strengths and weaknesses, presenting modifiable factors that could be addressed in focused educational/vocational interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50770,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"35 2","pages":"157-166"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/acp.0108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is little systematic information about intelligence and academic achievement among sheltered homeless adults. This study adds descriptive data on intelligence and academic achievement, examines discrepancies across these concepts, and explores the associations among demographic and psychosocial characteristics in the context of intelligence categories and discrepancies.

Methods: We studied intelligence, academic achievement, and discrepancies between IQ and academic achievement among 188 individuals experiencing homelessness who were systematically recruited from a large, urban, 24-hour homeless recovery center. Participants completed structured interviews, urine drug testing, the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, and the Wide Range Achievement Test, 4th edition.

Results: Average full-scale intelligence was low average (90) but higher than scores obtained in other studies of homeless populations. Academic achievement was lower than average (82 to 88). Performance/math deficits in the higher intelligence group indicate functional difficulties that could have contributed to homeless risk.

Conclusions: The low-normal intelligence and below-average achievement scores are not extreme enough to warrant immediate attention and intervention for most individuals. Systematic screening during entry into homeless services might identify learning strengths and weaknesses, presenting modifiable factors that could be addressed in focused educational/vocational interventions.

庇护流浪人口亚群的学习与成就特征。
背景:很少有关于收容的无家可归的成年人的智力和学业成就的系统信息。本研究增加了关于智力和学业成就的描述性数据,检查了这些概念之间的差异,并探讨了智力类别和差异背景下人口统计学和社会心理特征之间的联系。方法:我们研究了188名无家可归者的智力、学业成就和智商与学业成就之间的差异,这些人是从一个大型的、城市的、24小时的无家可归者康复中心系统招募的。参与者完成了结构化访谈、尿检、韦氏智力简略量表和第四版广域成就测验。结果:平均全面智力低于平均水平(90),但高于其他研究中无家可归者的得分。学业成绩低于平均水平(82 ~ 88分)。高智商组的表现/数学缺陷表明功能障碍可能导致无家可归的风险。结论:对大多数个体来说,低正常智力和低于平均水平的成就分数不足以引起立即关注和干预。在进入无家可归者服务机构期间进行的系统筛查可能会确定学习优势和劣势,提出可以通过重点教育/职业干预来解决的可修改因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The ANNALS publishes up-to-date information regarding the diagnosis and /or treatment of persons with mental disorders. Preferred manuscripts are those that report the results of controlled clinical trials, timely and thorough evidence-based reviews, letters to the editor, and case reports that present new appraisals of pertinent clinical topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信