Knowledge and training of Italian students in Healthcare Settings on COVID-19 vaccines and vaccination strategies, one year after the immunization campaign.

Q2 Medicine
Angela Bechini, Alfredo Vannacci, Cristina Salvati, Giada Crescioli, Niccolò Lombardi, Fabrizio Chiesi, Jonida Shtylla, Marco Del Riccio, Paolo Bonanni, Sara Boccalini
{"title":"Knowledge and training of Italian students in Healthcare Settings on COVID-19 vaccines and vaccination strategies, one year after the immunization campaign.","authors":"Angela Bechini,&nbsp;Alfredo Vannacci,&nbsp;Cristina Salvati,&nbsp;Giada Crescioli,&nbsp;Niccolò Lombardi,&nbsp;Fabrizio Chiesi,&nbsp;Jonida Shtylla,&nbsp;Marco Del Riccio,&nbsp;Paolo Bonanni,&nbsp;Sara Boccalini","doi":"10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2023.64.2.2934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>COVID-19 vaccines represent an important opportunity for defeating the disease, as long as high vaccination acceptance rates are achieved. Healthcare workers (HCWs) have a relevant role in the promotion of immunization among the population and since students in healthcare area will be HCWs it is crucial to provide more in-depth knowledge on vaccinations. Therefore, the aim of the study is to assess the knowledge of medical and pharmaceutical area students regarding COVID-19 vaccination and the impact of a specific Elective Teaching Activity (ETA) on the increase of students' knowledge. The ETA was held one year after the immunization campaign in Italy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Students' knowledge was tested with a questionnaire before and after attending the course. Descriptive statistical methods were used to analyse the results obtained. Student's t-tests for paired data were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 387 students at the University of Florence attended the course and took the same test before and after the ETA on COVID-19 vaccines. Despite achieving satisfactory average scores in the pre-course test (26/32 ± 4.0), all students were able to significantly enhance their final score (+17.1%; p < 0.001), indicating that the ETA was highly effective in improving their knowledge of COVID-19 vaccination. Medical students demonstrated a better comprehension of the role of the medical specialist in public health in the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, while some uncertainties were revealed regarding the role of pharmacists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study confirm that specific training activities on vaccination are effective for implementing the knowledge of future health professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":35174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9a/39/jpmh-2023-02-e152.PMC10468188.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2023.64.2.2934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: COVID-19 vaccines represent an important opportunity for defeating the disease, as long as high vaccination acceptance rates are achieved. Healthcare workers (HCWs) have a relevant role in the promotion of immunization among the population and since students in healthcare area will be HCWs it is crucial to provide more in-depth knowledge on vaccinations. Therefore, the aim of the study is to assess the knowledge of medical and pharmaceutical area students regarding COVID-19 vaccination and the impact of a specific Elective Teaching Activity (ETA) on the increase of students' knowledge. The ETA was held one year after the immunization campaign in Italy.

Methods: Students' knowledge was tested with a questionnaire before and after attending the course. Descriptive statistical methods were used to analyse the results obtained. Student's t-tests for paired data were used.

Results: Overall, 387 students at the University of Florence attended the course and took the same test before and after the ETA on COVID-19 vaccines. Despite achieving satisfactory average scores in the pre-course test (26/32 ± 4.0), all students were able to significantly enhance their final score (+17.1%; p < 0.001), indicating that the ETA was highly effective in improving their knowledge of COVID-19 vaccination. Medical students demonstrated a better comprehension of the role of the medical specialist in public health in the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, while some uncertainties were revealed regarding the role of pharmacists.

Conclusions: The results of this study confirm that specific training activities on vaccination are effective for implementing the knowledge of future health professionals.

Abstract Image

免疫运动一年后,在卫生保健机构对意大利学生进行COVID-19疫苗和疫苗接种战略的知识和培训。
导言:只要实现高疫苗接种率,COVID-19疫苗就是战胜这一疾病的重要机会。卫生保健工作者(HCWs)在促进人口免疫方面发挥着相关作用,由于卫生保健领域的学生将成为卫生保健工作者,因此提供更深入的疫苗接种知识至关重要。因此,本研究的目的是评估医学和药学领域学生对COVID-19疫苗接种的知识以及特定的选修教学活动(ETA)对学生知识增加的影响。ETA是在意大利免疫运动一年后举行的。方法:采用问卷调查法对学生在课前和课后的知识进行测试。采用描述性统计方法对所得结果进行分析。使用配对数据的学生t检验。结果:总体而言,佛罗伦萨大学的387名学生参加了该课程,并在COVID-19疫苗ETA前后进行了相同的测试。尽管在课前测试中取得了令人满意的平均成绩(26/32±4.0),但所有学生都能显著提高他们的最终成绩(+17.1%;p < 0.001),表明ETA在提高他们对COVID-19疫苗接种的认识方面非常有效。医学生对公共卫生医学专家在COVID-19疫苗接种运动中的作用有了更好的理解,而药剂师的作用也存在一些不确定性。结论:本研究结果证实,特定的疫苗接种培训活动对未来卫生专业人员的知识实施是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The journal is published on a four-monthly basis and covers the field of epidemiology and community health. The journal publishes original papers and proceedings of Symposia and/or Conferences which should be submitted in English. Papers are accepted on their originality and general interest. Ethical considerations will be taken into account.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信