Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography as a Diagnostic Strategy for Severe Endometrial Injury.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Tao Liu, Miao Zhou, Huihui Yang, Weixiang Liang, Ruiming Cai, Mingjin Cai
{"title":"Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography as a Diagnostic Strategy for Severe Endometrial Injury.","authors":"Tao Liu,&nbsp;Miao Zhou,&nbsp;Huihui Yang,&nbsp;Weixiang Liang,&nbsp;Ruiming Cai,&nbsp;Mingjin Cai","doi":"10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Endometrial injury is associated with poorer pregnancy outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in the detection of endometrial injury. This study included women who underwent CEUS of the uterus at the author's hospital between April 2020 and January 2021. The diagnostic performances of the CEUS-derived parameters in the detection of severe endometrial injury were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. The study included 67 participants (healthy control, n = 14; mild endometrial injury, n = 24; severe endometrial injury, n = 29). Enhancement intensity (EI) and area under the time-intensity curve (AUC TIC ) were significantly lower in the severe endometrial injury patients than healthy and mild endometrial injury subjects for both endometrial and subendometrial regions ( P < 0.05). Correlations analysis showed that EI and AUC TIC were positively correlated with endometrial thickness ( r = 0.460, P = 0.01, and r = 0.555, P < 0.01, respectively) and subendometrial thickness ( r = 0.501, P < 0.01, and r = 0.438, P = 0.01, respectively). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.720 ( P = 0.002), 79.31%, and 66.67% for endometrial EI; 0.818 ( P < 0.001), 75.86%, and 79.17% for subendometrial EI; 0.917 ( P < 0.001), 72.41%, and 95.83% for endometrial AUC TIC ; and 0.810 ( P < 0.001), 89.66%, and 70.83% for subendometrial AUC TIC , respectively. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography may have clinical utility in the prediction of endometrial injury in women of childbearing age.</p>","PeriodicalId":49116,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000645","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Endometrial injury is associated with poorer pregnancy outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in the detection of endometrial injury. This study included women who underwent CEUS of the uterus at the author's hospital between April 2020 and January 2021. The diagnostic performances of the CEUS-derived parameters in the detection of severe endometrial injury were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. The study included 67 participants (healthy control, n = 14; mild endometrial injury, n = 24; severe endometrial injury, n = 29). Enhancement intensity (EI) and area under the time-intensity curve (AUC TIC ) were significantly lower in the severe endometrial injury patients than healthy and mild endometrial injury subjects for both endometrial and subendometrial regions ( P < 0.05). Correlations analysis showed that EI and AUC TIC were positively correlated with endometrial thickness ( r = 0.460, P = 0.01, and r = 0.555, P < 0.01, respectively) and subendometrial thickness ( r = 0.501, P < 0.01, and r = 0.438, P = 0.01, respectively). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.720 ( P = 0.002), 79.31%, and 66.67% for endometrial EI; 0.818 ( P < 0.001), 75.86%, and 79.17% for subendometrial EI; 0.917 ( P < 0.001), 72.41%, and 95.83% for endometrial AUC TIC ; and 0.810 ( P < 0.001), 89.66%, and 70.83% for subendometrial AUC TIC , respectively. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography may have clinical utility in the prediction of endometrial injury in women of childbearing age.

超声造影作为重度子宫内膜损伤的诊断策略。
子宫内膜损伤与妊娠结局不良相关。本研究的目的是评价超声造影(CEUS)对子宫内膜损伤的诊断效果。本研究包括在2020年4月至2021年1月期间在提交人所在医院接受子宫超声造影的妇女。通过受试者工作特征曲线分析评价超声诊断参数对重度子宫内膜损伤的诊断价值。该研究包括67名参与者(健康对照,n = 14;轻度子宫内膜损伤,n = 24;重度子宫内膜损伤(n = 29)。重度子宫内膜损伤患者的增强强度(EI)和时间-强度曲线下面积(AUC TIC)均显著低于健康和轻度子宫内膜损伤患者的子宫内膜和子宫内膜下区域(P < 0.05)。相关性分析显示,EI和AUC TIC与子宫内膜厚度(r = 0.460, P = 0.01, r = 0.555, P < 0.01)和子宫内膜下厚度(r = 0.501, P < 0.01, r = 0.438, P = 0.01)呈正相关。子宫内膜EI的受者工作特征曲线下面积、敏感性和特异性分别为0.720 (P = 0.002)、79.31%和66.67%;子宫内膜下EI分别为0.818 (P < 0.001)、75.86%和79.17%;子宫内膜AUC TIC分别为0.917 (P < 0.001)、72.41%、95.83%;子宫内膜下AUC TIC分别为0.810 (P < 0.001)、89.66%和70.83%。超声造影在预测育龄妇女子宫内膜损伤方面可能具有临床应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasound Quarterly
Ultrasound Quarterly RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ultrasound Quarterly provides coverage of the newest, most sophisticated ultrasound techniques as well as in-depth analysis of important developments in this dynamic field. The journal publishes reviews of a wide variety of topics including trans-vaginal ultrasonography, detection of fetal anomalies, color Doppler flow imaging, pediatric ultrasonography, and breast sonography. Official Journal of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信