"I think most people feel like healthcare professionals tell them to take their treatments and judge them for not taking them": reflexive thematic analysis of the views of adults with cystic fibrosis on how treatment adherence is discussed in healthcare.
Sophie Dawson, Karen Rodham, Jennifer Taylor, Jane Dewar, Martin Wildman
{"title":"\"I think most people feel like healthcare professionals tell them to take their treatments and judge them for not taking them\": reflexive thematic analysis of the views of adults with cystic fibrosis on how treatment adherence is discussed in healthcare.","authors":"Sophie Dawson, Karen Rodham, Jennifer Taylor, Jane Dewar, Martin Wildman","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2023.2254318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Previous research exploring patient-practitioner communication in relation to adherence in cystic fibrosis (CF) is limited. This UK study explored the views of adults with CF on how treatment adherence (related to all CF treatments) is discussed in routine CF care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>12 White British adults (ten females; aged 20-37 years; mean 30.1 years) with CF participated in semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three overarching themes were developed through reflexive thematic analysis: (1) 'The power of language'; (2) 'Healthcare professionals do not recognise the importance of context'; and (3) '\"Admitting\" non-adherence is difficult'. The way in which adherence is discussed in adult CF care is viewed as paternalistic and infantilising. Participants reported that healthcare professionals do not always consider the desire to balance treatment-taking with living a normal life. Unwelcome responses from healthcare professionals, and the inability to accurately self-report the amount of treatment taken made it difficult to 'admit' non-adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A culture change is needed in CF care such that people who struggle to take their treatments are not labelled as disobedient, wilfully disobeying orders from healthcare professionals in positions of authority. Instead, an open, honest, non-judgemental approach, as recommended by healthcare agencies for over a decade, should be adopted.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"742-764"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2023.2254318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Previous research exploring patient-practitioner communication in relation to adherence in cystic fibrosis (CF) is limited. This UK study explored the views of adults with CF on how treatment adherence (related to all CF treatments) is discussed in routine CF care.
Methods: 12 White British adults (ten females; aged 20-37 years; mean 30.1 years) with CF participated in semi-structured interviews.
Results: Three overarching themes were developed through reflexive thematic analysis: (1) 'The power of language'; (2) 'Healthcare professionals do not recognise the importance of context'; and (3) '"Admitting" non-adherence is difficult'. The way in which adherence is discussed in adult CF care is viewed as paternalistic and infantilising. Participants reported that healthcare professionals do not always consider the desire to balance treatment-taking with living a normal life. Unwelcome responses from healthcare professionals, and the inability to accurately self-report the amount of treatment taken made it difficult to 'admit' non-adherence.
Conclusions: A culture change is needed in CF care such that people who struggle to take their treatments are not labelled as disobedient, wilfully disobeying orders from healthcare professionals in positions of authority. Instead, an open, honest, non-judgemental approach, as recommended by healthcare agencies for over a decade, should be adopted.
期刊介绍：
Psychology & Health promotes the study and application of psychological approaches to health and illness. The contents include work on psychological aspects of physical illness, treatment processes and recovery; psychosocial factors in the aetiology of physical illnesses; health attitudes and behaviour, including prevention; the individual-health care system interface particularly communication and psychologically-based interventions. The journal publishes original research, and accepts not only papers describing rigorous empirical work, including meta-analyses, but also those outlining new psychological approaches and interventions in health-related fields.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
