Robo-Lap Approach Optimizes Intraoperative Outcomes in Robotic Left and Right Hepatectomy.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Francesca Ratti, Rebecca Marino, Sara Ingallinella, Lucrezia Clocchiatti, Diletta Corallino, Marco Catena, Luca Aldrighetti
{"title":"Robo-Lap Approach Optimizes Intraoperative Outcomes in Robotic Left and Right Hepatectomy.","authors":"Francesca Ratti,&nbsp;Rebecca Marino,&nbsp;Sara Ingallinella,&nbsp;Lucrezia Clocchiatti,&nbsp;Diletta Corallino,&nbsp;Marco Catena,&nbsp;Luca Aldrighetti","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the present study is to evaluate the possible advantages of the Robo-Lap (parenchymal transection by laparoscopic ultrasonic dissector and robotic bipolar forceps and scissors) compared with pure robotic technique (parenchymal transection by use of robotic bipolar forceps and scissors) in major anatomical liver resections with specific focus on intraoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Major liver resections performed by robotic approach between February 1, 2021 and March 31, 2023 were stratified into two groups according to the approach used to address the phase of liver transection; Pure Robotic Group (n = 21) versus Robo-Lap Group (n = 48). The two groups were compared in terms of intra- and postoperative outcomes and in terms of rate of achievement of intraoperative textbook outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Conversion rate was similar between the two groups while incidence of adverse intraoperative events (according to Satava classification) was higher in the Pure Robotic compared with the Robo-Lap group (85.7% vs 39.6%, p < 0.001). Time to perform parenchymal transection was significantly shorter in the Robo-Lap group (180 min) compared with the Pure Robotic Group (240 min), p = 0.003. Intraoperative textbook outcomes were achieved in a lower proportion of patients in the Pure Robotic compared with the Robo-Lap group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Outcomes of the present study suggest a favorable role of the Robo-Lap approach in robotic major resections as it allows an improvement of the intraoperative results, a greater probability of an uneventful conduction of the procedure, and therefore, better management of the operating room time.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"27 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10473182/pdf/e2023.00025.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2023.00025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the possible advantages of the Robo-Lap (parenchymal transection by laparoscopic ultrasonic dissector and robotic bipolar forceps and scissors) compared with pure robotic technique (parenchymal transection by use of robotic bipolar forceps and scissors) in major anatomical liver resections with specific focus on intraoperative outcomes.

Methods: Major liver resections performed by robotic approach between February 1, 2021 and March 31, 2023 were stratified into two groups according to the approach used to address the phase of liver transection; Pure Robotic Group (n = 21) versus Robo-Lap Group (n = 48). The two groups were compared in terms of intra- and postoperative outcomes and in terms of rate of achievement of intraoperative textbook outcomes.

Results: Conversion rate was similar between the two groups while incidence of adverse intraoperative events (according to Satava classification) was higher in the Pure Robotic compared with the Robo-Lap group (85.7% vs 39.6%, p < 0.001). Time to perform parenchymal transection was significantly shorter in the Robo-Lap group (180 min) compared with the Pure Robotic Group (240 min), p = 0.003. Intraoperative textbook outcomes were achieved in a lower proportion of patients in the Pure Robotic compared with the Robo-Lap group.

Conclusion: Outcomes of the present study suggest a favorable role of the Robo-Lap approach in robotic major resections as it allows an improvement of the intraoperative results, a greater probability of an uneventful conduction of the procedure, and therefore, better management of the operating room time.

Robo-Lap方法优化机器人左、右肝切除术的术中效果。
背景:本研究的目的是评估Robo-Lap(通过腹腔镜超声解剖器和机器人双极钳和剪刀进行实质横断)与纯机器人技术(通过使用机器人双极钳或剪刀进行实质横切)在主要解剖肝脏切除中的可能优势,特别关注术中结果。方法:在2021年2月1日至2023年3月31日期间,通过机器人方法进行的主要肝脏切除,根据用于处理肝脏横断阶段的方法分为两组;纯机器人组(n=21)与机器人圈组(n=48)。两组患者在术中和术后结果以及术中教科书结果的实现率方面进行了比较。结果:两组之间的转化率相似,而与Robo-Lap组相比,纯机器人组的术中不良事件发生率(根据Satava分类)更高(85.7%对39.6%,p<0.001)。与纯机器人组(240分钟)相比,Robo-Lab组(180分钟)进行实质横断的时间明显更短,p=0.003。与Robo-Lap组相比,纯机器人组的术中教科书结果的患者比例较低。结论:本研究的结果表明,Robo-Lap入路在机器人大切除中具有良好的作用,因为它可以改善术中结果,更大概率顺利进行手术,从而更好地管理手术室时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons publishes original scientific articles on basic science and technical topics in all the fields involved with laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive surgery. CRSLS, MIS Case Reports from SLS is dedicated to the publication of Case Reports in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The journals seek to advance our understandings and practice of minimally invasive, image-guided surgery by providing a forum for all relevant disciplines and by promoting the exchange of information and ideas across specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信