UNLIMITED MEDICAL LIABILITY?

Emory law journal online Pub Date : 2022-01-01
Jessica L Roberts, Leah R Fowler, Paul S Appelbaum
{"title":"UNLIMITED MEDICAL LIABILITY?","authors":"Jessica L Roberts, Leah R Fowler, Paul S Appelbaum","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pursuant to the standard account of the law, physicians only owe special legal duties within the confines of an established treatment relationship. However, this well- accepted adage of black letter medical malpractice law does not, in fact, reflect reality. Indeed, the physician-patient relationship is rarely well-defined, and-perhaps more troublingly-courts have been willing to find liability outside of its boundaries. This Essay scrutinizes the notion that doctors have heightened legal obligations solely to their current patients. It concludes that physicians may be liable for far more conduct than the conventional account implies. It ends by suggesting ways to cabin this potentially unlimited liability.</p>","PeriodicalId":72901,"journal":{"name":"Emory law journal online","volume":"72 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10468648/pdf/nihms-1926585.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emory law journal online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pursuant to the standard account of the law, physicians only owe special legal duties within the confines of an established treatment relationship. However, this well- accepted adage of black letter medical malpractice law does not, in fact, reflect reality. Indeed, the physician-patient relationship is rarely well-defined, and-perhaps more troublingly-courts have been willing to find liability outside of its boundaries. This Essay scrutinizes the notion that doctors have heightened legal obligations solely to their current patients. It concludes that physicians may be liable for far more conduct than the conventional account implies. It ends by suggesting ways to cabin this potentially unlimited liability.

无限医疗责任?
根据法律的标准解释,医生只在既定的治疗关系范围内承担特殊的法律义务。然而,这一广为接受的医疗事故法黑体字格言实际上并不反映现实。事实上,医患关系很少有明确的定义,而且--也许更令人不安的是--法院一直愿意在医患关系的界限之外认定责任。本文对医生仅对现有患者负有更多法律义务的观点进行了仔细研究。它的结论是,医生可能要对远比传统说法所暗示的更多行为负责。最后,本文提出了一些方法,以消除这种潜在的无限责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信