Animal Feasibility Study of a Novel Spinal Cord Stimulation Multicolumn Lead (Heron Lead).

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Patrick Mertens, Maria Celeste Cantone, Alessandro Antonini, Sandro Ferrari, Valentina Ferpozzi, Alaa Abd-Elsayed
{"title":"Animal Feasibility Study of a Novel Spinal Cord Stimulation Multicolumn Lead (Heron Lead).","authors":"Patrick Mertens,&nbsp;Maria Celeste Cantone,&nbsp;Alessandro Antonini,&nbsp;Sandro Ferrari,&nbsp;Valentina Ferpozzi,&nbsp;Alaa Abd-Elsayed","doi":"10.24976/Discov.Med.202335177.62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently available spinal cord stimulation paddle leads require a laminectomy, limiting the types of clinicians who can implant and increasing the risk of complications. Recently, WISE S.r.l. designed a prototype multicolumn lead named the Heron® lead that can be implanted percutaneously. The purpose of the study was to examine the efficiency of placing a paddle lead percutaneously.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten sheep were assigned to either the Heron lead group (n = 7) or the control group (n = 3). The sheep were observed for 13 weeks after implantation. Neurological and clinical examinations were conducted prior to surgery and then during the follow-up period. The implantation sites were evaluated through macroscopic observations during the article explantation and the lead migration was evaluated by comparing the article positioning at the surgery, four weeks after the surgery and at the explantation day through fluoroscope images. A qualitative comparison was made between the results collected with the test article and the control article.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Observations at the surgical sites indicate that test animals appeared to have less swelling around the surgical wound than control ones in the first 14 days, but no impact on wound healing was noticed. Additionally, no clear difference was observed in pain scores between the two groups, with observations tending to show that the maximum pain was occurring later in the test group with respect to the control group. General clinical observations showed no major difference between the two groups, and determined clinical abnormalities were not directly related to the procedure. Lastly, neurological deficits frequency decreased from the first to last animal operated, regardless of their test or control status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study concluded that the Heron lead is safe to implant, with a safety profile similar to the control article. Additionally, we conclude that the Heron lead is effective in reducing lead migration events.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24976/Discov.Med.202335177.62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Currently available spinal cord stimulation paddle leads require a laminectomy, limiting the types of clinicians who can implant and increasing the risk of complications. Recently, WISE S.r.l. designed a prototype multicolumn lead named the Heron® lead that can be implanted percutaneously. The purpose of the study was to examine the efficiency of placing a paddle lead percutaneously.

Methods: Ten sheep were assigned to either the Heron lead group (n = 7) or the control group (n = 3). The sheep were observed for 13 weeks after implantation. Neurological and clinical examinations were conducted prior to surgery and then during the follow-up period. The implantation sites were evaluated through macroscopic observations during the article explantation and the lead migration was evaluated by comparing the article positioning at the surgery, four weeks after the surgery and at the explantation day through fluoroscope images. A qualitative comparison was made between the results collected with the test article and the control article.

Results: Observations at the surgical sites indicate that test animals appeared to have less swelling around the surgical wound than control ones in the first 14 days, but no impact on wound healing was noticed. Additionally, no clear difference was observed in pain scores between the two groups, with observations tending to show that the maximum pain was occurring later in the test group with respect to the control group. General clinical observations showed no major difference between the two groups, and determined clinical abnormalities were not directly related to the procedure. Lastly, neurological deficits frequency decreased from the first to last animal operated, regardless of their test or control status.

Conclusions: Our study concluded that the Heron lead is safe to implant, with a safety profile similar to the control article. Additionally, we conclude that the Heron lead is effective in reducing lead migration events.

一种新型脊髓刺激多柱引线的动物可行性研究。
背景:目前可用的脊髓刺激桨式导联需要椎板切除术,这限制了临床医生可以植入的类型,并增加了并发症的风险。最近,WISE S.r.l.设计了一种名为Heron®的多柱引线原型,可以经皮植入。本研究的目的是检验经皮放置导联的有效性。方法:将10只羊分为Heron引体组(n = 7)和对照组(n = 3),植入后观察13周。手术前和随访期间分别进行神经学和临床检查。通过物体移出时的宏观观察来评估植入部位,通过透视图像比较物体在手术时、手术后四周和移出当天的位置来评估铅的迁移。用试验品和对照品收集的结果进行了定性比较。结果:在手术部位观察,试验动物在手术创面周围的肿胀在前14天比对照动物少,但对创面愈合没有影响。此外,两组之间的疼痛评分没有明显差异,观察结果倾向于显示,实验组的最大疼痛发生时间比对照组晚。一般临床观察显示两组之间无显著差异,确定的临床异常与手术无直接关系。最后,从第一次到最后一次手术的动物,无论他们的测试或控制状态如何,神经功能缺损的频率都有所下降。结论:我们的研究得出的结论是,Heron铅是安全的植入,其安全性与对照文章相似。此外,我们得出结论,苍鹭铅是有效的减少铅迁移事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信