A Framework for Evaluating the Implementation of Biosimilar Drugs.

IF 0.6 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Lisa Milgram, Sarah Wheeler, Andrea Adamic, Mirhad Loncar, Micheal Guirguis, Betty Jo McCabe
{"title":"A Framework for Evaluating the Implementation of Biosimilar Drugs.","authors":"Lisa Milgram,&nbsp;Sarah Wheeler,&nbsp;Andrea Adamic,&nbsp;Mirhad Loncar,&nbsp;Micheal Guirguis,&nbsp;Betty Jo McCabe","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The introduction of biosimilar drugs has significant effects on health care systems, and a variety of approaches are required to support acceptance, adoption, and use of these drugs. Literature exists on the enablers of, and barriers to, biosimilar implementation, but frameworks that support the evaluation of biosimilar implementation strategies are currently lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop an evaluation framework for assessing the effects of biosimilar implementation strategies on patients, clinicians, and publicly funded drug programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The scope of the evaluation was determined by a pan-Canadian working group through the creation of a logic model of activities and expected outcomes associated with biosimilar implementation. Each component of the logic model was considered under the RE-AIM framework, which led to a set of evaluation questions and indicators. Feedback to inform the final framework was sought from stakeholders through focus group sessions and written responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An evaluation framework was created that articulates evaluation questions and indicators across 5 priority areas: stakeholder engagement, patient experience, patient outcomes, clinician experience, and system sustainability and affordability. Stakeholder feedback was obtained through 9 focus group sessions with a total of 87 participants. Feedback was used to refine the framework on the basis of stakeholder priorities and feasibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through extensive stakeholder consultation, an evaluation framework was developed to measure and monitor the effects of biosimilar implementation on the 5 identified priority areas, as well as to inform future biosimilar implementations. This framework can be used as a starting point for evaluating the implementation of biosimilars across health care systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":51646,"journal":{"name":"CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY","volume":"76 2","pages":"109-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10049771/pdf/cjhp-76-109.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The introduction of biosimilar drugs has significant effects on health care systems, and a variety of approaches are required to support acceptance, adoption, and use of these drugs. Literature exists on the enablers of, and barriers to, biosimilar implementation, but frameworks that support the evaluation of biosimilar implementation strategies are currently lacking.

Objective: To develop an evaluation framework for assessing the effects of biosimilar implementation strategies on patients, clinicians, and publicly funded drug programs.

Methods: The scope of the evaluation was determined by a pan-Canadian working group through the creation of a logic model of activities and expected outcomes associated with biosimilar implementation. Each component of the logic model was considered under the RE-AIM framework, which led to a set of evaluation questions and indicators. Feedback to inform the final framework was sought from stakeholders through focus group sessions and written responses.

Results: An evaluation framework was created that articulates evaluation questions and indicators across 5 priority areas: stakeholder engagement, patient experience, patient outcomes, clinician experience, and system sustainability and affordability. Stakeholder feedback was obtained through 9 focus group sessions with a total of 87 participants. Feedback was used to refine the framework on the basis of stakeholder priorities and feasibility.

Conclusions: Through extensive stakeholder consultation, an evaluation framework was developed to measure and monitor the effects of biosimilar implementation on the 5 identified priority areas, as well as to inform future biosimilar implementations. This framework can be used as a starting point for evaluating the implementation of biosimilars across health care systems.

生物类似药实施评价框架。
背景:生物仿制药的引入对卫生保健系统具有重大影响,需要多种方法来支持这些药物的接受、采用和使用。文献中存在生物类似药实施的推动因素和障碍,但目前缺乏支持生物类似药实施策略评估的框架。目的:建立一个评估框架,以评估生物仿制药实施策略对患者、临床医生和公共资助药物计划的影响。方法:评估的范围由一个泛加拿大工作组通过创建与生物仿制药实施相关的活动和预期结果的逻辑模型来确定。在RE-AIM框架下考虑逻辑模型的每个组成部分,从而产生一组评价问题和指标。通过焦点小组会议和书面答复向利益攸关方征求反馈意见,为最终框架提供信息。结果:创建了一个评估框架,明确了5个优先领域的评估问题和指标:利益相关者参与、患者体验、患者结果、临床医生经验、系统可持续性和可负担性。利益相关者通过9次焦点小组会议获得反馈,共有87名参与者。在利益相关者优先事项和可行性的基础上,利用反馈来完善框架。结论:通过广泛征求利益相关者的意见,制定了一个评估框架,以衡量和监测生物仿制药实施对5个确定的优先领域的影响,并为未来的生物仿制药实施提供信息。该框架可作为评估整个卫生保健系统生物仿制药实施情况的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The CJHP is an academic journal that focuses on how pharmacists in hospitals and other collaborative health care settings optimize safe and effective drug use for patients in Canada and throughout the world. The aim of the CJHP is to be a respected international publication serving as a major venue for dissemination of information related to patient-centred pharmacy practice in hospitals and other collaborative health care settings in Canada and throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信