The recalibration and redevelopment of a model to calculate patients' probability of completing a colonoscopy following an abnormal fecal test.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Medical Screening Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-04 DOI:10.1177/09691413231195568
Amanda F Petrik, Eric S Johnson, Matthew Slaughter, Michael C Leo, Jamie Thompson, Rajasekhara R Mummadi, Ricardo Jimenez, Syed Akmal Hussain, Gloria Coronado
{"title":"The recalibration and redevelopment of a model to calculate patients' probability of completing a colonoscopy following an abnormal fecal test.","authors":"Amanda F Petrik, Eric S Johnson, Matthew Slaughter, Michael C Leo, Jamie Thompson, Rajasekhara R Mummadi, Ricardo Jimenez, Syed Akmal Hussain, Gloria Coronado","doi":"10.1177/09691413231195568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is an effective screening tool for colorectal cancer. If an FIT is abnormal, a follow-up colonoscopy is necessary to remove polyps or find cancers. We sought to develop a usable risk prediction model to identify patients unlikely to complete a colonoscopy following an abnormal FIT test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recalibrated and then redeveloped a prediction model in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), using a retrospective cohort of patients aged 50-75 with an abnormal FIT test and clinical data. Logistic and Cox regressions were used to recalibrate and then redevelop the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial risk model used data from eight FQHCs (26 clinics) including 1723 patients. When we applied the model to a single large FQHC (34 clinics, 884 eligible patients), the model did not recalibrate successfully (c-statistic dropped more than 0.05, from 0.66 to 0.61). The model was redeveloped in the same FQHC in a cohort of 1401 patients with a c-statistic of 0.65.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The original model developed in a group of FQHCs did not adequately recalibrate in the single large FQHC. Health system, patient characteristics or data differences may have led to the inability to recalibrate the model. However, the redeveloped model provides an adequate model for the single FQHC.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":" ","pages":"28-34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10909915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Screening","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413231195568","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is an effective screening tool for colorectal cancer. If an FIT is abnormal, a follow-up colonoscopy is necessary to remove polyps or find cancers. We sought to develop a usable risk prediction model to identify patients unlikely to complete a colonoscopy following an abnormal FIT test.

Methods: We recalibrated and then redeveloped a prediction model in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), using a retrospective cohort of patients aged 50-75 with an abnormal FIT test and clinical data. Logistic and Cox regressions were used to recalibrate and then redevelop the model.

Results: The initial risk model used data from eight FQHCs (26 clinics) including 1723 patients. When we applied the model to a single large FQHC (34 clinics, 884 eligible patients), the model did not recalibrate successfully (c-statistic dropped more than 0.05, from 0.66 to 0.61). The model was redeveloped in the same FQHC in a cohort of 1401 patients with a c-statistic of 0.65.

Conclusions: The original model developed in a group of FQHCs did not adequately recalibrate in the single large FQHC. Health system, patient characteristics or data differences may have led to the inability to recalibrate the model. However, the redeveloped model provides an adequate model for the single FQHC.

重新校准和开发一个模型,用于计算患者在粪便检测异常后完成结肠镜检查的概率。
目的:粪便免疫化学检验(FIT)是一种有效的大肠癌筛查工具。如果 FIT 异常,则需要进行后续结肠镜检查以切除息肉或发现癌症。我们试图开发一个可用的风险预测模型,以确定在 FIT 检测异常后不太可能完成结肠镜检查的患者:方法:我们在联邦合格医疗中心(FQHC)重新校准并重新开发了一个预测模型,使用的是 50-75 岁 FIT 检测异常患者的回顾性队列和临床数据。使用逻辑回归和 Cox 回归对模型进行了重新校准和开发:最初的风险模型使用了 8 家 FQHC(26 家诊所)的数据,其中包括 1723 名患者。当我们将模型应用于一家大型 FQHC(34 家诊所,884 名符合条件的患者)时,模型未能成功重新校准(c 统计量下降超过 0.05,从 0.66 降至 0.61)。该模型在同一家 FQHC 的 1401 名患者中重新建立,c 统计量为 0.65:结论:在一组 FQHC 中开发的原始模型在单个大型 FQHC 中没有得到充分的重新校准。医疗系统、患者特征或数据差异可能是导致模型无法重新校准的原因。然而,重新开发的模型为单一的 FQHC 提供了一个适当的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Screening
Journal of Medical Screening 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Screening, a fully peer reviewed journal, is concerned with all aspects of medical screening, particularly the publication of research that advances screening theory and practice. The journal aims to increase awareness of the principles of screening (quantitative and statistical aspects), screening techniques and procedures and methodologies from all specialties. An essential subscription for physicians, clinicians and academics with an interest in screening, epidemiology and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信