Christopher Carroll, Katie Sworn, Andrew Booth, Aki Tsuchiya, Michelle Maden, Megumi Rosenberg
{"title":"Equity in healthcare access and service coverage for older people: a scoping review of the conceptual literature.","authors":"Christopher Carroll, Katie Sworn, Andrew Booth, Aki Tsuchiya, Michelle Maden, Megumi Rosenberg","doi":"10.1136/ihj-2021-000092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is currently no global review of the conceptual literature on the equity of healthcare coverage (including access) for older people. It is important to understand the factors affecting access to health and social care for this group, so that policy and service actions can be taken to reduce potential inequities. A scoping review of published and grey literature was conducted with the aim of summarising how health and social care service access and coverage for older people has been conceptualised. PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, SciELO, LILACS, BIREME and Global Index Medicus were searched. Selection of sources and data charting were conducted independently by two reviewers. The database searches retrieved 10 517 citations; 32 relevant articles were identified for inclusion from a global evidence base. Data were summarised and a meta-framework and model produced listing concepts specific to equitable health and social care service coverage relating to older people. The meta-framework identified the following relevant factors: acceptability, affordability, appropriateness, availability and resources, awareness, capacity for decision-making, need, personal social and cultural circumstances, physical accessibility. This scoping review is relevant to the development and specification of policy for older people. It conceptualises those factors, such as acceptability and affordability, that affect an older person's ability and capacity to access integrated, person-centred health and social care services in a meaningful way. These factors should be taken into account when seeking to determine whether equity in service use or access is being achieved for older people.</p>","PeriodicalId":73393,"journal":{"name":"Integrated healthcare journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"e000092"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10327458/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated healthcare journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ihj-2021-000092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
There is currently no global review of the conceptual literature on the equity of healthcare coverage (including access) for older people. It is important to understand the factors affecting access to health and social care for this group, so that policy and service actions can be taken to reduce potential inequities. A scoping review of published and grey literature was conducted with the aim of summarising how health and social care service access and coverage for older people has been conceptualised. PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, SciELO, LILACS, BIREME and Global Index Medicus were searched. Selection of sources and data charting were conducted independently by two reviewers. The database searches retrieved 10 517 citations; 32 relevant articles were identified for inclusion from a global evidence base. Data were summarised and a meta-framework and model produced listing concepts specific to equitable health and social care service coverage relating to older people. The meta-framework identified the following relevant factors: acceptability, affordability, appropriateness, availability and resources, awareness, capacity for decision-making, need, personal social and cultural circumstances, physical accessibility. This scoping review is relevant to the development and specification of policy for older people. It conceptualises those factors, such as acceptability and affordability, that affect an older person's ability and capacity to access integrated, person-centred health and social care services in a meaningful way. These factors should be taken into account when seeking to determine whether equity in service use or access is being achieved for older people.
目前还没有对老年人医疗保险公平性(包括获得)的概念文献进行全球审查。重要的是要了解影响这一群体获得医疗和社会护理的因素,以便采取政策和服务行动来减少潜在的不平等。对已发表的灰色文献进行了范围界定审查,目的是总结老年人获得医疗和社会护理服务的机会和覆盖范围是如何概念化的。检索PubMed、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Web of Science、SciELO、LILACS、BIREME和Global Index Medicus。资料来源的选择和数据制图由两名审查员独立进行。数据库搜索检索到10 517次引用;从全球证据库中确定了32篇相关文章供纳入。对数据进行了总结,并生成了一个元框架和模型,列出了与老年人有关的公平医疗和社会护理服务覆盖率的具体概念。元框架确定了以下相关因素:可接受性、可负担性、适当性、可用性和资源、意识、决策能力、需求、个人社会和文化环境、物质可及性。这一范围审查与老年人政策的制定和规范有关。它将影响老年人以有意义的方式获得以人为中心的综合健康和社会护理服务的能力和能力的因素,如可接受性和可负担性等概念化。在试图确定老年人在服务使用或获得方面是否实现公平时,应考虑到这些因素。