Diagnosis of periprosthetic hip infection: a clinical update.

Q2 Medicine
Valentina Luppi, Dario Regis, Andrea Sandri, Bruno Magnan
{"title":"Diagnosis of periprosthetic hip infection: a clinical update.","authors":"Valentina Luppi,&nbsp;Dario Regis,&nbsp;Andrea Sandri,&nbsp;Bruno Magnan","doi":"10.23750/abm.v94iS2.13792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication following hip arthroplasty, which is associated with significant health cost, morbidity and mortality. There is currently no consensus in the optimal definition of PJI, and establishing diagnosis is challenging because of conflicting guidelines, numerous tests, and limited evidence, with no single test providing a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. Consequently, the diagnosis of PJI is based on a combination of clinical data, laboratory results from peripheral blood and synovial fluid, microbiological culture, histological evaluation of periprosthetic tissue, radiological investigations, and intraoperative findings. Usually, a sinus tract communicating with the prosthesis and two positive cultures for the same pathogen were regarded as major criteria for the diagnosis, but, in recent years, the availability of new serum and synovial biomarkers as well as molecular methods have shown encouraging results. Culture-negative PJI occurs in 5-12% of cases and is caused by low-grade infection as well as by previous or concomitant antibiotic therapy. Unfortunately, delay in diagnosis of PJI is associated with poorer outcomes. In this article, the current knowledge in epidemiology, pathogenesis, classification, and diagnosis of prosthetic hip infections is reviewed.</p>","PeriodicalId":35682,"journal":{"name":"Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense","volume":"94 S2","pages":"e2023095"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v94iS2.13792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication following hip arthroplasty, which is associated with significant health cost, morbidity and mortality. There is currently no consensus in the optimal definition of PJI, and establishing diagnosis is challenging because of conflicting guidelines, numerous tests, and limited evidence, with no single test providing a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. Consequently, the diagnosis of PJI is based on a combination of clinical data, laboratory results from peripheral blood and synovial fluid, microbiological culture, histological evaluation of periprosthetic tissue, radiological investigations, and intraoperative findings. Usually, a sinus tract communicating with the prosthesis and two positive cultures for the same pathogen were regarded as major criteria for the diagnosis, but, in recent years, the availability of new serum and synovial biomarkers as well as molecular methods have shown encouraging results. Culture-negative PJI occurs in 5-12% of cases and is caused by low-grade infection as well as by previous or concomitant antibiotic therapy. Unfortunately, delay in diagnosis of PJI is associated with poorer outcomes. In this article, the current knowledge in epidemiology, pathogenesis, classification, and diagnosis of prosthetic hip infections is reviewed.

髋关节假体周围感染的诊断:临床更新。
人工关节周围感染(PJI)是髋关节置换术后的一个严重并发症,它与巨大的健康成本、发病率和死亡率相关。目前对于PJI的最佳定义没有达成共识,并且由于相互冲突的指南、大量的测试和有限的证据,没有一种测试提供100%的敏感性和特异性,因此建立诊断具有挑战性。因此,PJI的诊断是基于临床数据、外周血和滑液的实验室结果、微生物培养、假体周围组织的组织学评估、放射学检查和术中发现。通常,与假体连通的窦道和同一病原体的两个阳性培养被视为诊断的主要标准,但是,近年来,新的血清和滑膜生物标志物以及分子方法的可用性显示出令人鼓舞的结果。培养阴性PJI发生在5-12%的病例中,由低级别感染以及先前或同时使用抗生素治疗引起。不幸的是,PJI的诊断延迟与较差的预后相关。本文就人工髋关节感染的流行病学、发病机制、分类和诊断等方面的最新研究进展进行综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense
Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Acta Bio Medica Atenei Parmensis is the official Journal of the Society of Medicine and Natural Sciences of Parma, and it is one of the few Italian Journals to be included in many excellent scientific data banks (i.e. MEDLINE). Acta Bio Medica was founded in 1887 and its founders and collaborators, Clinicians and Surgeons, entered history. Acta Bio Medica Atenei Parmensis publishes Original Articles, Commentaries, Review Articles, Case Reports of experimental and general Medicine. A section is devoted to a Continuous Medical Education programme in order to help primary care Physicians to improve the quality of care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信