{"title":"Rapid-Response Electroencephalography in Seizure Diagnosis and Patient Care: Lessons From a Community Hospital.","authors":"Eleanor Eberhard, Samuel R Beckerman","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>BACKGROUND: Nonconvulsive seizures are a major source of in-hospital morbidity and a cause of unexplained encephalopathy in critically ill patients. Electroencephalography (EEG) is essential to confirm nonconvulsive seizures and can guide patient-specific workup, treatment, and prognostication. In a 208-bed community hospital, EEG services were limited to 1 part-time EEG technician and 1 EEG machine shared between inpatient and outpatient settings. Its use was restricted to typical business hours. A nursing-led quality improvement (QI) project endeavored to enhance access to EEG by introducing a point-of-care rapid-response EEG program. METHODS: For this project, a multidisciplinary protocol was developed to deploy a Food and Drug Administration-cleared, point-of-care rapid-response EEG platform (Ceribell Inc) in a community hospital's emergency department and inpatient units to streamline neurodiagnostic workups. This QI project compared EEG volume, study location, time-to-EEG, number of cases with seizures captured on EEG, and hospital-level financial metrics of diagnosis-related group reimbursements and length of stay for the 6 months before (pre-QI, using conventional EEG) and 6 months after implementing the rapid-response protocol (post-QI). RESULTS: Electroencephalography volume increased from 35 studies pre-QI to 115 post-QI (3.29-fold increase), whereas the median time from EEG order to EEG start decreased 7.6-fold (74 [34-187] minutes post-QI vs 562 [321-1034] minutes pre-QI). Point-of-care EEG was also associated with more confirmed seizure diagnoses compared with conventional EEG (27/115 post-QI vs 0/35 pre-QI). This resulted in additional diagnosis-related group reimbursements and hospital revenue. Availability of point-of-care EEG was also associated with a shorter median length of stay. CONCLUSION: A nurse-led, rapid-response EEG protocol at a community hospital resulted in significant improvements in EEG accessibility and seizure diagnosis with hospital-level financial benefits. By expanding access to EEG, confirming nonconvulsive seizures, and increasing care efficiency, rapid-response EEG protocols can enhance patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing","volume":"55 5","pages":"157-163"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000715","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Nonconvulsive seizures are a major source of in-hospital morbidity and a cause of unexplained encephalopathy in critically ill patients. Electroencephalography (EEG) is essential to confirm nonconvulsive seizures and can guide patient-specific workup, treatment, and prognostication. In a 208-bed community hospital, EEG services were limited to 1 part-time EEG technician and 1 EEG machine shared between inpatient and outpatient settings. Its use was restricted to typical business hours. A nursing-led quality improvement (QI) project endeavored to enhance access to EEG by introducing a point-of-care rapid-response EEG program. METHODS: For this project, a multidisciplinary protocol was developed to deploy a Food and Drug Administration-cleared, point-of-care rapid-response EEG platform (Ceribell Inc) in a community hospital's emergency department and inpatient units to streamline neurodiagnostic workups. This QI project compared EEG volume, study location, time-to-EEG, number of cases with seizures captured on EEG, and hospital-level financial metrics of diagnosis-related group reimbursements and length of stay for the 6 months before (pre-QI, using conventional EEG) and 6 months after implementing the rapid-response protocol (post-QI). RESULTS: Electroencephalography volume increased from 35 studies pre-QI to 115 post-QI (3.29-fold increase), whereas the median time from EEG order to EEG start decreased 7.6-fold (74 [34-187] minutes post-QI vs 562 [321-1034] minutes pre-QI). Point-of-care EEG was also associated with more confirmed seizure diagnoses compared with conventional EEG (27/115 post-QI vs 0/35 pre-QI). This resulted in additional diagnosis-related group reimbursements and hospital revenue. Availability of point-of-care EEG was also associated with a shorter median length of stay. CONCLUSION: A nurse-led, rapid-response EEG protocol at a community hospital resulted in significant improvements in EEG accessibility and seizure diagnosis with hospital-level financial benefits. By expanding access to EEG, confirming nonconvulsive seizures, and increasing care efficiency, rapid-response EEG protocols can enhance patient care.
摘要:背景:非惊厥性癫痫是危重患者住院发病率的主要来源,也是导致不明原因脑病的原因之一。脑电图(EEG)对确认非惊厥性癫痫发作至关重要,可以指导患者的具体检查、治疗和预后。在一家拥有208张床位的社区医院,脑电图服务仅限于1名兼职脑电图技术员和1台在住院和门诊之间共享的脑电图机。它的使用仅限于典型的营业时间。一个由护理主导的质量改进(QI)项目试图通过引入护理点快速反应脑电图程序来提高脑电图的使用率。方法:针对该项目,制定了一项多学科方案,在社区医院的急诊科和住院部部署食品和药物管理局批准的、护理点快速响应的EEG平台(Ceribell Inc),以简化神经诊断工作。该QI项目比较了快速反应方案实施前6个月(QI前,使用常规脑电图)和实施后6个月的脑电图量、研究地点、到脑电图的时间、脑电图捕捉到的癫痫发作病例数,以及诊断相关组报销的医院级财务指标和住院时间。结果:脑电图容量从QI前的35项研究增加到QI后的115项(增加3.29倍),而从脑电图顺序到脑电图开始的中位时间减少了7.6倍(QI后74[34-187]分钟vs QI前562[321-1034]分钟)。与传统脑电图相比,护理点脑电图也与更多确诊的癫痫诊断相关(QI后27/115 vs QI前0/35)。这导致了额外的与诊断相关的团体报销和医院收入。护理点脑电图的可用性也与中位住院时间较短有关。结论:在社区医院,护士主导的快速反应脑电图方案显著改善了脑电图的可及性和癫痫诊断,并带来了医院层面的经济效益。通过扩大脑电图的使用范围,确认非惊厥性癫痫发作,并提高护理效率,快速反应脑电图协议可以加强患者护理。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neuroscience Nursing (JNN), the official journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, contains original articles on advances in neurosurgical and neurological techniques as they affect nursing care, theory and research, as well as commentary on the roles of the neuroscience nurse in the health care team.
The journal provides information to nurses and health care professionals working in diverse areas of neuroscience patient care such as multi-specialty and neuroscience intensive care units, general neuroscience units, combination units (neuro/ortho, neuromuscular/rehabilitation, neuropsychiatry, neurogerontology), rehabilitation units, medical-surgical units, pediatric units, emergency and trauma departments, and surgery. The information is applicable to professionals working in clinical, research, administrative, and educational settings.