[Efficacy analysis of surgical combined with postoperative adjuvant therapy for T3 gallbladder carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study].

F C Yang, J Hu, T H Su, Z M Geng, K Zhang, J Ding, Z Q Lei, B Yi, J D Li, Z H Tang, Z J Cheng, Y H Qiu
{"title":"[Efficacy analysis of surgical combined with postoperative adjuvant therapy for T3 gallbladder carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study].","authors":"F C Yang,&nbsp;J Hu,&nbsp;T H Su,&nbsp;Z M Geng,&nbsp;K Zhang,&nbsp;J Ding,&nbsp;Z Q Lei,&nbsp;B Yi,&nbsp;J D Li,&nbsp;Z H Tang,&nbsp;Z J Cheng,&nbsp;Y H Qiu","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20230202-00047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the clinical value of adjuvant therapy in patients with T3 gallbladder cancer (GBC) who have undergone R0 resection. <b>Methods:</b> Clinical and pathological data from 415 patients with T3 GBC who underwent surgical treatment in 7 tertiary centers in China from January 2013 to December 2018 were collected,including 251 males and 164 females,aged (61±11)years (range: 26 to 88 years). Depending on whether to receive adjuvant therapy after radical resection,the patients were divided into the radical resection group alone (group A,<i>n</i>=358) and the radical resection combined with the postoperative adjuvant therapy group (group B,<i>n</i>=57). The general data of the two groups were matched 1∶1 by propensity score matching method,and the caliper value was 0.02.Clinicopathological characteristics,overall survival and disease-free survival of the two groups were compared.The Cox regression model was used for multivariate analysis,and patients with at least one or more independent risk factors were classified as high-risk clinicopathological subtypes. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess the clinical value of adjuvant therapy after radical resection in patients with high-risk clinicopathological subtypes. <b>Results:</b> After the matching,there were 42 patients in each of the two groups. The incidence of gallbladder cancer and the number of dissected lymph nodes in group B after cholecystectomy were higher than those in group A (<i>χ<sup>2</sup></i>=9.224,2.570,both <i>P</i><0.05). There were no significant differences in overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate between the two groups before and after matching (all <i>P</i>>0.05). The results of the univariate and multivariate analysis showed that CA19-9>39 U/ml,nerve invasion,tumor location (liver side or bilateral),TNM stage ⅢB to ⅣB ,poorly differentiated tumor were independent prognostic factors of overall survival and disease-free survival of patients with T3 stage gallbladder cancer (all <i>P</i><0.05).Three hundred and twenty-nine patients(79.3%) had high-risk clinicopathological subtypes,and the median survival time after curative resection with and without adjuvant therapy was 17 months and 34 months respectively,and the 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were respectively 40.0%,21.3% and 46.0%,46.0% (<i>χ<sup>2</sup></i>=4.042,<i>P</i>=0.044);the median disease-free survival time was 9 months and 13 months,and the 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 23.4%,13.6% and 30.2%,18.2% (<i>χ<sup>2</sup></i>=0.992,<i>P</i>=0.319). <b>Conclusions:</b> Postoperative adjuvant therapy following radical surgery did not yield significant improvements in the overall survival and disease-free survival rates of patients diagnosed with T3 gallbladder cancer. However, it demonstrated a significant extension in the overall survival rate for patients presenting high-risk clinicopathological subtypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23966,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery]","volume":"61 10","pages":"863-870"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20230202-00047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the clinical value of adjuvant therapy in patients with T3 gallbladder cancer (GBC) who have undergone R0 resection. Methods: Clinical and pathological data from 415 patients with T3 GBC who underwent surgical treatment in 7 tertiary centers in China from January 2013 to December 2018 were collected,including 251 males and 164 females,aged (61±11)years (range: 26 to 88 years). Depending on whether to receive adjuvant therapy after radical resection,the patients were divided into the radical resection group alone (group A,n=358) and the radical resection combined with the postoperative adjuvant therapy group (group B,n=57). The general data of the two groups were matched 1∶1 by propensity score matching method,and the caliper value was 0.02.Clinicopathological characteristics,overall survival and disease-free survival of the two groups were compared.The Cox regression model was used for multivariate analysis,and patients with at least one or more independent risk factors were classified as high-risk clinicopathological subtypes. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess the clinical value of adjuvant therapy after radical resection in patients with high-risk clinicopathological subtypes. Results: After the matching,there were 42 patients in each of the two groups. The incidence of gallbladder cancer and the number of dissected lymph nodes in group B after cholecystectomy were higher than those in group A (χ2=9.224,2.570,both P<0.05). There were no significant differences in overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate between the two groups before and after matching (all P>0.05). The results of the univariate and multivariate analysis showed that CA19-9>39 U/ml,nerve invasion,tumor location (liver side or bilateral),TNM stage ⅢB to ⅣB ,poorly differentiated tumor were independent prognostic factors of overall survival and disease-free survival of patients with T3 stage gallbladder cancer (all P<0.05).Three hundred and twenty-nine patients(79.3%) had high-risk clinicopathological subtypes,and the median survival time after curative resection with and without adjuvant therapy was 17 months and 34 months respectively,and the 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were respectively 40.0%,21.3% and 46.0%,46.0% (χ2=4.042,P=0.044);the median disease-free survival time was 9 months and 13 months,and the 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 23.4%,13.6% and 30.2%,18.2% (χ2=0.992,P=0.319). Conclusions: Postoperative adjuvant therapy following radical surgery did not yield significant improvements in the overall survival and disease-free survival rates of patients diagnosed with T3 gallbladder cancer. However, it demonstrated a significant extension in the overall survival rate for patients presenting high-risk clinicopathological subtypes.

[外科联合术后辅助治疗T3胆囊癌的疗效分析:一项多中心回顾性研究]。
目的:探讨辅助治疗在癌症T3胆囊癌R0切除术中的临床应用价值。方法:收集2013年1月至2018年12月在中国7个三级中心接受手术治疗的415例T3 GBC患者的临床和病理数据,其中男性251例,女性164例,年龄(61±11)岁(范围:26-88岁)。根据根治性切除后是否接受辅助治疗,将患者分为单纯根治性切除组(A组,n=358)和根治性切除联合术后辅助治疗组(B组,n=57)。两组的一般数据采用倾向评分匹配法进行1∶1的匹配,卡尺值为0.02。比较两组的临床病理特点、总生存率和无病生存率。Cox回归模型用于多变量分析,具有至少一个或多个独立危险因素的患者被归类为高危临床病理亚型。对高危临床病理亚型患者进行亚组分析,以评估根治术后辅助治疗的临床价值。结果:配对后,两组患者各42例。B组胆囊切除术后胆囊癌症发生率和淋巴结清扫数均高于A组(X~2=9.224,2.570,两者均P>0.05),低分化肿瘤是影响T3期胆囊癌症患者总生存率和无病生存率的独立预后因素(P均方差2=4.042,P=0.044);中位无病生存时间分别为9个月和13个月,3年和5年无病生存率分别为23.4%、13.6%和30.2%、18.2%(2=0.992,P=0.319)。然而,它证明了高危临床病理亚型患者的总生存率显著提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信