The Quality of Dying in Frail Institutionalized Older Patients After Nonoperative and Operative Management of a Proximal Femoral Fracture: An In-Depth Analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sverre A I Loggers, Romke Van Balen, Hanna C Willems, Taco Gosens, Suzanne Polinder, Kornelis J Ponsen, Cornelis L P Van de Ree, Jeroen Steens, Michael H J Verhofstad, Rutger G Zuurmond, Pieter Joosse, Esther M M Van Lieshout
{"title":"The Quality of Dying in Frail Institutionalized Older Patients After Nonoperative and Operative Management of a Proximal Femoral Fracture: An In-Depth Analysis.","authors":"Sverre A I Loggers, Romke Van Balen, Hanna C Willems, Taco Gosens, Suzanne Polinder, Kornelis J Ponsen, Cornelis L P Van de Ree, Jeroen Steens, Michael H J Verhofstad, Rutger G Zuurmond, Pieter Joosse, Esther M M Van Lieshout","doi":"10.1177/10499091231180556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Proximal femoral fractures in frail patients have a poor prognosis. Despite the high mortality, little is known about the quality of dying (QoD) while this is an integral part of palliative care and could influence decision making on nonoperative- (NOM) or operative management (OM). To identify the QoD in frail patients with a proximal femoral fracture. Data from the prospective FRAIL-HIP study, that studied the outcomes of NOM and OM in institutionalized older patients ≥70 years with a limited life expectancy who sustained a proximal femoral fracture, was analyzed. This study included patients who died within the 6-month study period and whose proxies evaluated the QoD. The QoD was evaluated with the Quality of Dying and Death (QODD) questionnaire resulting in an overall score and 4 subcategory scores (Symptom control, Preparation, Connectedness, and Transcendence). In total 52 (64% of NOM) and 21 (53% of OM) of the proxies responded to the QODD. The overall QODD score was 6.8 (P<sub>25</sub>-P<sub>75</sub> 5.7-7.7) (intermediate), with 34 (47%) of the proxies rating the QODD 'good to almost perfect'. Significant differences in the QODD scores between groups were not noted (NOM; 7.0 (P<sub>25</sub>-P<sub>75</sub> 5.7-7.8) vs OM; 6.6 (P<sub>25</sub>-P<sub>75</sub> 6.1-7.2), P = .73). Symptom control was the lowest rated subcategory in both groups. The QoD in frail older nursing home patients with a proximal femoral fracture is good and humane. QODD scores after NOM are at least as good as OM. Improving symptom control would further increase the QoD.</p>","PeriodicalId":50810,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"583-591"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11032625/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091231180556","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Proximal femoral fractures in frail patients have a poor prognosis. Despite the high mortality, little is known about the quality of dying (QoD) while this is an integral part of palliative care and could influence decision making on nonoperative- (NOM) or operative management (OM). To identify the QoD in frail patients with a proximal femoral fracture. Data from the prospective FRAIL-HIP study, that studied the outcomes of NOM and OM in institutionalized older patients ≥70 years with a limited life expectancy who sustained a proximal femoral fracture, was analyzed. This study included patients who died within the 6-month study period and whose proxies evaluated the QoD. The QoD was evaluated with the Quality of Dying and Death (QODD) questionnaire resulting in an overall score and 4 subcategory scores (Symptom control, Preparation, Connectedness, and Transcendence). In total 52 (64% of NOM) and 21 (53% of OM) of the proxies responded to the QODD. The overall QODD score was 6.8 (P25-P75 5.7-7.7) (intermediate), with 34 (47%) of the proxies rating the QODD 'good to almost perfect'. Significant differences in the QODD scores between groups were not noted (NOM; 7.0 (P25-P75 5.7-7.8) vs OM; 6.6 (P25-P75 6.1-7.2), P = .73). Symptom control was the lowest rated subcategory in both groups. The QoD in frail older nursing home patients with a proximal femoral fracture is good and humane. QODD scores after NOM are at least as good as OM. Improving symptom control would further increase the QoD.

股骨近端骨折非手术治疗和手术治疗后体弱住院老年患者的死亡质量:深入分析
体弱患者股骨近端骨折的预后很差。尽管死亡率很高,但人们对死亡质量(QoD)却知之甚少,而死亡质量是姑息治疗不可或缺的一部分,可影响非手术治疗(NOM)或手术治疗(OM)的决策。本研究旨在确定股骨近端骨折体弱患者的濒死质量。前瞻性 FRAIL-HIP 研究对股骨近端骨折患者的非手术治疗和手术治疗效果进行了研究。该研究包括在 6 个月研究期内死亡的患者,其代理人对患者的 QoD 进行了评估。QoD 采用临终质量 (QODD) 问卷进行评估,得出总分和 4 个子类别分数(症状控制、准备、联系和超越)。共有 52 名代理人(64% 的 NOM)和 21 名代理人(53% 的 OM)回答了 QODD 问卷。总体 QODD 得分为 6.8(P25-P75 为 5.7-7.7)(中等),其中 34 名代理人(47%)将 QODD 评为 "好到几乎完美"。各组之间的 QODD 分数没有明显差异(NOM;7.0 (P25-P75 5.7-7.8) vs OM;6.6 (P25-P75 6.1-7.2), P = .73)。症状控制是两组中评分最低的子类别。股骨近端骨折老年护理院体弱患者的 QoD 良好且人性化。NOM 后的 QODD 评分至少与 OM 相当。改善症状控制将进一步提高 QoD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
169
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine (AJHPM) is a peer-reviewed journal, published eight times a year. In 30 years of publication, AJHPM has highlighted the interdisciplinary team approach to hospice and palliative medicine as related to the care of the patient and family. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信