Comparison of rostral spread of lumbosacral epidural volume calculated by body weight or length of the vertebral column in small-sized anesthetized dogs.

Abstract

The first objective of this prospective, randomized, crossover experimental trial was to compare the rostral spread of lumbosacral epidural volume calculated by body weight (BW) or vertebral column length (LE) in 6 small, isoflurane-anesthetized female beagle dogs (BW: 7.5 to 10.2 kg; LE measured from the occipital crest to the sacrococcygeal space: 46 to 56 cm). The second objective was to assess the response to a noxious stimulus once the dogs recovered from anesthesia and to determine the effects of the injection on cardiopulmonary variables. While in sternal position, dogs were injected through an epidural catheter with a volume mixture of bupivacaine 0.25% and iopamidol 15% based on BW: 0.2 mL/kg or LE: 0.05 mL/cm (< 50 cm) or 0.07 mL/cm (50 to < 70 cm). Rostral spread was determined by counting the number of vertebrae reached by iopamidol using computed tomography. After anesthesia, cardiopulmonary variables, motor function, and responses to nociceptive stimuli were evaluated. Comparisons were completed with mixed linear models and 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (P < 0.05). The volume of injectate (3.29 ± 0.74 versus 1.81 ± 0.21 mL; mean ± SD) and the number of vertebrae (22 ± 2 versus 19 ± 2 vertebrae) reached by iopamidol were significantly greater for LE than for BW. Response to nociception, time to return of pain sensation, motor function, and cardiopulmonary variables were similar between groups. In conclusion, dosing based on LE resulted in larger rostral spread than when based on BW in dogs of small size.