Is silver diamine fluoride effective in reducing dentin hypersensitivity? A systematic review.

Q4 Dentistry
Érica Torres de Almeida Piovesan, Júlia Barros Alves, Caroline Diniz Pagani Vieira Ribeiro, Carla Massignan, Ana Cristina Barreto Bezerra, Soraya Coelho Leal
{"title":"Is silver diamine fluoride effective in reducing dentin hypersensitivity? A systematic review.","authors":"Érica Torres de Almeida Piovesan,&nbsp;Júlia Barros Alves,&nbsp;Caroline Diniz Pagani Vieira Ribeiro,&nbsp;Carla Massignan,&nbsp;Ana Cristina Barreto Bezerra,&nbsp;Soraya Coelho Leal","doi":"10.34172/joddd.2023.35449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the clinical efficacy (sensitivity reduction) and safety (gum damage) of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) as a tooth desensitizer for adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search strategy was developed and adapted from 12 databases. Two independent reviewers selected the studies in consensus with a third reviewer. Randomized clinical trials with adult volunteers affected by dentin hypersensitivity (DH), and receiving treatment with SDF were included. Studies with volunteers testing tooth whitening products, using some type of desensitizer, or taking analgesic or anti-inflammatory medication were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed according to the RoB 2 tool, and confidence in cumulative evidence, according to GRADE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 3 articles were included. The average pain assessed using the visual analog scale was lower in the SDF groups than in the short-term control groups (24h to 7 days) (<i>P</i>=0.0134 and <i>P</i>=0.0015) of the two studies. The third study evaluated a combination of SDF and a CO<sub>2</sub> laser, compared to using only SDF, and found no statistical difference between the two (<i>P</i>=0.74). Inflammation and gingival staining were also evaluated in two of the three studies. No adverse effects were reported. All the included studies had a high risk of bias, and the certainty of the evidence was very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SDF can be used as a safe and effective tooth desensitizer in adults, with good results, as was achieved in a short-term follow-up. However, more studies with longer evaluation periods are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":15599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects","volume":"17 2","pages":"63-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462467/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2023.35449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the clinical efficacy (sensitivity reduction) and safety (gum damage) of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) as a tooth desensitizer for adults.

Methods: The search strategy was developed and adapted from 12 databases. Two independent reviewers selected the studies in consensus with a third reviewer. Randomized clinical trials with adult volunteers affected by dentin hypersensitivity (DH), and receiving treatment with SDF were included. Studies with volunteers testing tooth whitening products, using some type of desensitizer, or taking analgesic or anti-inflammatory medication were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed according to the RoB 2 tool, and confidence in cumulative evidence, according to GRADE.

Results: Only 3 articles were included. The average pain assessed using the visual analog scale was lower in the SDF groups than in the short-term control groups (24h to 7 days) (P=0.0134 and P=0.0015) of the two studies. The third study evaluated a combination of SDF and a CO2 laser, compared to using only SDF, and found no statistical difference between the two (P=0.74). Inflammation and gingival staining were also evaluated in two of the three studies. No adverse effects were reported. All the included studies had a high risk of bias, and the certainty of the evidence was very low.

Conclusion: SDF can be used as a safe and effective tooth desensitizer in adults, with good results, as was achieved in a short-term follow-up. However, more studies with longer evaluation periods are required.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

氟化二胺银对减少牙本质过敏有效吗?系统回顾。
背景:本系统综述的目的是评估氟化二胺银(SDF)作为成人牙齿脱敏剂的临床疗效(敏感性降低)和安全性(牙龈损伤)。方法:从12个数据库中开发和调整搜索策略。两名独立审稿人与第三名审稿人一致选择研究。纳入了受牙本质过敏(DH)影响并接受SDF治疗的成年志愿者的随机临床试验。志愿者测试牙齿美白产品,使用某种类型的脱敏剂,或服用镇痛或抗炎药物的研究被排除在外。根据RoB 2工具评估偏倚风险,根据GRADE评估累积证据的置信度。结果:仅纳入3篇文章。两项研究中,SDF组用视觉模拟量表评估的平均疼痛低于短期对照组(24h ~ 7 d) (P=0.0134和P=0.0015)。第三项研究评估了SDF和CO2激光的组合,与仅使用SDF相比,发现两者之间没有统计学差异(P=0.74)。三个研究中的两个也评估了炎症和牙龈染色。无不良反应报告。所有纳入的研究都有较高的偏倚风险,证据的确定性非常低。结论:SDF可作为一种安全有效的成人牙齿脱敏剂,短期随访效果良好。然而,需要更多的研究和更长的评估期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Dental Research Dental Clinics Dental Prospects (JODDD) is a Platinum* Open Access, peer-reviewed quarterly indexed journal that publishes articles of basic, clinical, and prospective nature in all areas of dentistry and oral health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信