Translation, Cultural Adaption, and Validation of the Persian Version of the Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Seyede Fatemeh Alavi, Zahra Sadat Ghoreishi, Nasibeh Zanjari, Britt Frisk Pados, Roya Choopani
{"title":"Translation, Cultural Adaption, and Validation of the Persian Version of the Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool.","authors":"Seyede Fatemeh Alavi,&nbsp;Zahra Sadat Ghoreishi,&nbsp;Nasibeh Zanjari,&nbsp;Britt Frisk Pados,&nbsp;Roya Choopani","doi":"10.1159/000527226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool (PediEAT) is a parent-report tool to assess feeding problems in children aged 6 months to 7 years. This study aimed to translate and adapt the PediEAT to Persian and determine its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PediEAT was translated and culturally adapted the following guidelines for health-related instruments. Face and content validity was assessed using an expert panel. This study also aimed to evaluate psychometric properties using a sample of 160 children without feeding problems and 43 children with diagnosed feeding problems. Known-groups validation was used to compare PediEAT scores between children with and without feeding problems. In criterion validity, pediatricians' opinions were used as a criterion. To calculate internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha was used. After 2 weeks, temporal stability was assessed with 40 parents who repeated the PediEAT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Face and content validity showed that all tool items had CVI and kappa coefficients higher than 0.8. Known-group validity showed that the total and subscale scores significantly differed between children with and without feeding problems (p < 0.001). Criterion validity showed that criterion measurements correlated with questionnaire measurements. All four subscales and the total scale showed acceptable internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha > 0.74). Test-retest reliability was acceptable (ICC = 0.987, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PediEAT-Persian version is a valid and reliable tool for assessing symptoms of problematic feeding in Persian children aged 6 months to 7 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":12114,"journal":{"name":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","volume":"75 3","pages":"140-148"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000527226","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool (PediEAT) is a parent-report tool to assess feeding problems in children aged 6 months to 7 years. This study aimed to translate and adapt the PediEAT to Persian and determine its psychometric properties.

Methods: The PediEAT was translated and culturally adapted the following guidelines for health-related instruments. Face and content validity was assessed using an expert panel. This study also aimed to evaluate psychometric properties using a sample of 160 children without feeding problems and 43 children with diagnosed feeding problems. Known-groups validation was used to compare PediEAT scores between children with and without feeding problems. In criterion validity, pediatricians' opinions were used as a criterion. To calculate internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha was used. After 2 weeks, temporal stability was assessed with 40 parents who repeated the PediEAT.

Results: Face and content validity showed that all tool items had CVI and kappa coefficients higher than 0.8. Known-group validity showed that the total and subscale scores significantly differed between children with and without feeding problems (p < 0.001). Criterion validity showed that criterion measurements correlated with questionnaire measurements. All four subscales and the total scale showed acceptable internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha > 0.74). Test-retest reliability was acceptable (ICC = 0.987, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The PediEAT-Persian version is a valid and reliable tool for assessing symptoms of problematic feeding in Persian children aged 6 months to 7 years.

翻译,文化适应,并验证波斯语版儿科饮食评估工具。
儿科饮食评估工具(PediEAT)是一种家长报告工具,用于评估6个月至7岁儿童的喂养问题。本研究的目的是翻译和改编的pediet为波斯语,并确定其心理测量特性。方法:根据以下与健康相关的器械指南对《儿科医学指南》进行翻译和文化调整。面部和内容效度由专家小组评估。本研究还旨在评估160名没有进食问题的儿童和43名被诊断有进食问题的儿童的心理测量特征。已知组验证用于比较有和无喂养问题儿童的PediEAT评分。在标准效度方面,以儿科医生的意见作为标准。为了计算内部一致性,使用Cronbach's alpha。2周后,对40名家长进行时间稳定性评估。结果:面部效度和内容效度显示,所有工具项目的CVI和kappa系数均大于0.8。已知组效度显示,有喂食问题和无喂食问题儿童的总得分和分量表得分差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。效标效度显示效标测量值与问卷测量值相关。所有四个分量表和总量表均具有可接受的内部一致性信度(Cronbach's alpha > 0.74)。重测信度可接受(ICC = 0.987, p < 0.001)。结论:PediEAT-Persian版本是评估6个月至7岁波斯儿童喂养问题症状的有效和可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica
Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1947, ''Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica'' provides a forum for international research on the anatomy, physiology, and pathology of structures of the speech, language, and hearing mechanisms. Original papers published in this journal report new findings on basic function, assessment, management, and test development in communication sciences and disorders, as well as experiments designed to test specific theories of speech, language, and hearing function. Review papers of high quality are also welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信