Jejunal access for enteral nutrition: A practical guide for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with jejunal extension and direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Amélie Bourgeois , Paraskevas Gkolfakis , Lucia Fry , Marianna Arvanitakis
{"title":"Jejunal access for enteral nutrition: A practical guide for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with jejunal extension and direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy","authors":"Amélie Bourgeois ,&nbsp;Paraskevas Gkolfakis ,&nbsp;Lucia Fry ,&nbsp;Marianna Arvanitakis","doi":"10.1016/j.bpg.2023.101849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>For patients requiring long-term (&gt;4 weeks) jejunal nutrition, jejunal medication delivery, or decompression, a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy<span> with jejunal extension (PEG-J) or a direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ) may be indicated. PEG-J is the preferred option if a PEG tube is already in place or if simultaneous gastric decompression and jejunal nutrition are needed. DPEJ is recommended for patients with altered </span></span>anatomy<span><span><span><span> due to foregut surgery, high risk of jejunal extension migration, and whenever PEG-J fails. Successful placement rates are lower for DPEJ but recent publications have reported improvements, partly due to the use of balloon-assisted enteroscopy. Both techniques are contraindicated in cases of active </span>peritonitis, uncorrectable </span>coagulopathy<span>, and ongoing bowel ischaemia, and relative contraindications include, among other, </span></span>peptic ulcer disease<span> and haemodynamic or respiratory instability. In this narrative review, we present the most recent evidence on indications, contraindications, technical considerations, adverse events, and outcomes of PEG-J and DPEJ.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":56031,"journal":{"name":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S152169182300029X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For patients requiring long-term (>4 weeks) jejunal nutrition, jejunal medication delivery, or decompression, a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with jejunal extension (PEG-J) or a direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ) may be indicated. PEG-J is the preferred option if a PEG tube is already in place or if simultaneous gastric decompression and jejunal nutrition are needed. DPEJ is recommended for patients with altered anatomy due to foregut surgery, high risk of jejunal extension migration, and whenever PEG-J fails. Successful placement rates are lower for DPEJ but recent publications have reported improvements, partly due to the use of balloon-assisted enteroscopy. Both techniques are contraindicated in cases of active peritonitis, uncorrectable coagulopathy, and ongoing bowel ischaemia, and relative contraindications include, among other, peptic ulcer disease and haemodynamic or respiratory instability. In this narrative review, we present the most recent evidence on indications, contraindications, technical considerations, adverse events, and outcomes of PEG-J and DPEJ.

肠内营养的空肠通路:经皮内镜下空肠延伸胃造口术和直接经皮内镜下空肠造口术的实用指南
对于需要长期(>;4周)空肠营养、空肠药物输送或减压的患者,可能需要经皮内镜下空肠扩张胃造口术(PEG-J)或直接经皮内镜空肠造口术(DPEJ)。如果PEG管已经就位,或者如果需要同时进行胃减压和空肠营养,则PEG-J是优选的选择。DPEJ推荐用于前肠手术导致解剖结构改变、空肠延伸迁移风险高以及PEG-J失败的患者。DPEJ的成功放置率较低,但最近的出版物报道有所改善,部分原因是使用了球囊辅助肠镜。这两种技术在活动性腹膜炎、无法纠正的凝血病和持续性肠缺血的情况下都是禁忌症,相对禁忌症包括消化性溃疡和血液动力学或呼吸不稳定。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们介绍了关于PEG-J和DPEJ的适应症、禁忌症、技术考虑、不良事件和结果的最新证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Each topic-based issue of Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology will provide a comprehensive review of current clinical practice and thinking within the specialty of gastroenterology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信