A Multidisciplinary Approach to Increase Compliance With Spontaneous Awakening Trials and Spontaneous Breathing Trials in the Medical Intensive Care Unit.

IF 1 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Nicole Jones, Rozmeen Shivji
{"title":"A Multidisciplinary Approach to Increase Compliance With Spontaneous Awakening Trials and Spontaneous Breathing Trials in the Medical Intensive Care Unit.","authors":"Nicole Jones,&nbsp;Rozmeen Shivji","doi":"10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prolonged mechanical ventilation can lead to undesirable outcomes, including reduced 6-month survival, increased hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and physiological stress. A large academic medical center currently has a Spontaneous Awakening Trials/Spontaneous Breathing Trials (SAT/SBT) protocol with an SAT/SBT compliance goal of 80%; however, the medical intensive care unit's (MICU) SAT/SBT compliance rate was only 33% for FY2020. The Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control (DMAIC) framework was used to guide this quality improvement project. Current processes and root causes for noncompliance were analyzed through chart reviews, a preimplementation staff survey, and meetings with stakeholders. Compliance rates were compared before and after implementation. Interventions included education, reminder fliers, weekly chart audits, and individualized weekly emails to noncompliant RNs and RTs. To achieve project sustainability, 2 unit champions were selected to continue the weekly emails and chart audits. Data were collected from 216 patients and 1063 patient ventilator days from October 2020 to October 2021. The SAT/SBT compliance steadily increased throughout the 13-month implementation period, except for 3 months. The preimplementation monthly SAT/SBT compliance rate was 26% in September 2020. After 13 months of project implementation, the SAT/SBT compliance rate was 64% in October 2021. There was no significant change in patient ventilator days pre- and post-quality improvement project. A multi-intervention implementation strategy consisting of education in-services, weekly chart audits, weekly emails to staff with current compliance rates, and reminder fliers can successfully increase SAT/SBT compliance rates. Utilizing unit champions provides sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":10789,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prolonged mechanical ventilation can lead to undesirable outcomes, including reduced 6-month survival, increased hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and physiological stress. A large academic medical center currently has a Spontaneous Awakening Trials/Spontaneous Breathing Trials (SAT/SBT) protocol with an SAT/SBT compliance goal of 80%; however, the medical intensive care unit's (MICU) SAT/SBT compliance rate was only 33% for FY2020. The Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control (DMAIC) framework was used to guide this quality improvement project. Current processes and root causes for noncompliance were analyzed through chart reviews, a preimplementation staff survey, and meetings with stakeholders. Compliance rates were compared before and after implementation. Interventions included education, reminder fliers, weekly chart audits, and individualized weekly emails to noncompliant RNs and RTs. To achieve project sustainability, 2 unit champions were selected to continue the weekly emails and chart audits. Data were collected from 216 patients and 1063 patient ventilator days from October 2020 to October 2021. The SAT/SBT compliance steadily increased throughout the 13-month implementation period, except for 3 months. The preimplementation monthly SAT/SBT compliance rate was 26% in September 2020. After 13 months of project implementation, the SAT/SBT compliance rate was 64% in October 2021. There was no significant change in patient ventilator days pre- and post-quality improvement project. A multi-intervention implementation strategy consisting of education in-services, weekly chart audits, weekly emails to staff with current compliance rates, and reminder fliers can successfully increase SAT/SBT compliance rates. Utilizing unit champions provides sustainability.

多学科方法提高医学重症监护病房自发觉醒试验和自发呼吸试验的依从性
延长机械通气可导致不良后果,包括6个月生存率降低、住院死亡率增加、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间延长和生理应激。一家大型学术医疗中心目前有一个自发觉醒试验/自发呼吸试验(SAT/SBT)协议,SAT/SBT合规性目标为80%;然而,医疗重症监护病房(MICU)的SAT/SBT合规率在2020财年仅为33%。采用定义-测量-分析-改进-控制(DMAIC)框架来指导本质量改进项目。通过图表审查、实施前员工调查和与利益相关者的会议,分析了当前流程和不合规的根本原因。比较实施前后的符合率。干预措施包括教育、提醒传单、每周图表审计,以及向不合规的注册护士和注册护士发送个性化的每周电子邮件。为了实现项目的可持续性,选择了2个单元冠军来继续每周的电子邮件和图表审计。从2020年10月至2021年10月收集了216名患者和1063名患者呼吸机天数的数据。在13个月的实施期间,SAT/SBT合规稳步增加,除了3个月。2020年9月,实施前每月SAT/SBT合规率为26%。经过13个月的项目实施,2021年10月SAT/SBT合规率为64%。质量改善项目前后患者呼吸机天数无显著变化。多干预实施策略包括在职教育、每周图表审计、每周向员工发送当前合规率的电子邮件,以及提醒传单,可以成功提高SAT/SBT合规率。利用单位冠军提供可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Critical Care Nursing Quarterly (CCNQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides current practice-oriented information for the continuing education and improved clinical practice of critical care professionals, including nurses, physicians, and allied health care professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信