Popliteal Fossa Sarcomas.

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
O Erdogan, A Çeli K, A N T Yildirim, E Tekçe, G Altun, S Demi Röz, Y Güler, K Ozkan, V Gurkan
{"title":"Popliteal Fossa Sarcomas.","authors":"O Erdogan,&nbsp;A Çeli K,&nbsp;A N T Yildirim,&nbsp;E Tekçe,&nbsp;G Altun,&nbsp;S Demi Röz,&nbsp;Y Güler,&nbsp;K Ozkan,&nbsp;V Gurkan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Soft tissue sarcomas of the popliteal fossa are extremely rare tumors of mesenchymal origin accounting for 3%-5% of all extremity sarcomas. However, data regarding the tumor type, neurovascular involvement, and administration of radiation therapy before or after resection are limited. This study aimed to report on popliteal fossa sarcomas analyzing data from two institutions based on a relatively large patient sample. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty-four patients (80%; 9 men and 15 women) with a popliteal fossa soft tissue sarcoma were included in this study. The reviewed patient data included sex, age, duration of complaints, interval to diagnosis, radiology, pre- and postoperative biopsy, tumor histology, surgery type, complications, and pre- and postoperative oncologic and functional outcomes. The minimum follow-up was 24 months. RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 48 ± 21.23 (range 3-72) years at the time of diagnosis. The mean follow-up was 41.79 ± 16.97 (range 24-120) months. The most common histological diagnoses were synovial sarcoma (6 patients), hemangiopericytoma (2 patients), soft tissue osteosarcoma (2 patients), unidentified fusiform cell sarcoma (2 patients), and myxofibrosarcoma (2 patients). Local recurrence after limb salvage was observed in six patients (26%). At the latest followup, 2 patients died of the disease, 2 patients were still alive with progressive lung disease and soft tissue metastasis, and the remaining 20 patients were free from the disease. CONCLUSIONS Microscopically positive margins may not be an absolute indication for amputation. Also, negative margins do not provide a guarantee that local recurrence will not occur. Lymph node or distant metastasis may be predictive factors for local recurrence rather than positive margins. Key words: fossa poplitea, sarcoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":6980,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","volume":"90 3","pages":"181-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Soft tissue sarcomas of the popliteal fossa are extremely rare tumors of mesenchymal origin accounting for 3%-5% of all extremity sarcomas. However, data regarding the tumor type, neurovascular involvement, and administration of radiation therapy before or after resection are limited. This study aimed to report on popliteal fossa sarcomas analyzing data from two institutions based on a relatively large patient sample. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty-four patients (80%; 9 men and 15 women) with a popliteal fossa soft tissue sarcoma were included in this study. The reviewed patient data included sex, age, duration of complaints, interval to diagnosis, radiology, pre- and postoperative biopsy, tumor histology, surgery type, complications, and pre- and postoperative oncologic and functional outcomes. The minimum follow-up was 24 months. RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 48 ± 21.23 (range 3-72) years at the time of diagnosis. The mean follow-up was 41.79 ± 16.97 (range 24-120) months. The most common histological diagnoses were synovial sarcoma (6 patients), hemangiopericytoma (2 patients), soft tissue osteosarcoma (2 patients), unidentified fusiform cell sarcoma (2 patients), and myxofibrosarcoma (2 patients). Local recurrence after limb salvage was observed in six patients (26%). At the latest followup, 2 patients died of the disease, 2 patients were still alive with progressive lung disease and soft tissue metastasis, and the remaining 20 patients were free from the disease. CONCLUSIONS Microscopically positive margins may not be an absolute indication for amputation. Also, negative margins do not provide a guarantee that local recurrence will not occur. Lymph node or distant metastasis may be predictive factors for local recurrence rather than positive margins. Key words: fossa poplitea, sarcoma.

腘窝肉瘤。
研究目的:腘窝软组织肉瘤是一种极为罕见的间质肿瘤,约占四肢肉瘤的3%-5%。然而,关于肿瘤类型、神经血管受累情况以及切除前后放射治疗的数据有限。本研究旨在报告腘窝肉瘤,分析来自两个机构的数据,基于一个相对较大的患者样本。材料与方法24例(80%;9名男性和15名女性)腘窝软组织肉瘤纳入本研究。回顾的患者资料包括性别、年龄、主诉持续时间、诊断间隔、放射学、术前和术后活检、肿瘤组织学、手术类型、并发症、术前和术后肿瘤和功能结果。最小随访时间为24个月。结果患者确诊时平均年龄为48±21.23岁(范围3 ~ 72岁)。平均随访时间为41.79±16.97(24 ~ 120)个月。最常见的组织学诊断为滑膜肉瘤(6例)、血管外皮细胞瘤(2例)、软组织骨肉瘤(2例)、不明梭状细胞肉瘤(2例)和黏液纤维肉瘤(2例)。残肢术后局部复发6例(26%)。最新随访时,2例患者死亡,2例患者仍存活,并伴有进行性肺部疾病和软组织转移,其余20例患者无疾病。结论镜检边缘阳性可能不是截肢的绝对指征。此外,阴性切缘并不能保证不会发生局部复发。淋巴结或远处转移可能是局部复发的预测因素,而不是阳性边缘。关键词:腘窝;肉瘤;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Editorial Board accepts for publication articles, reports from congresses, fellowships, book reviews, reports concerning activities of orthopaedic and other relating specialised societies, reports on anniversaries of outstanding personalities in orthopaedics and announcements of congresses and symposia being prepared. Articles include original papers, case reports and current concepts reviews and recently also instructional lectures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信