Designing and psychometric evaluation of pharmacists' attitude toward ethical challenges questionnaire in pharmacy practice: A mixed‑method study.

Rasool Esmalipour, Pooneh Salari, Abbas Ebadi, Neda Mehrdad, Bagher Larijani
{"title":"Designing and psychometric evaluation of pharmacists' attitude toward ethical challenges questionnaire in pharmacy practice: A mixed‑method study.","authors":"Rasool Esmalipour, Pooneh Salari, Abbas Ebadi, Neda Mehrdad, Bagher Larijani","doi":"10.1007/s40199-023-00472-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Knowledge advancement exposes the pharmacists to new ethical and professional challenges in providing pharmaceutical care. The pharmacist's attitude towards the ethical challenges of pharmacy practice could be of great help in assessing pharmacist's ethical sensitivity. This study aimed to design a valid and reliable questionnaire for measuring pharmacists' attitudes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study is the second phase of a sequential exploratory mixed‑method study for designing and psychometric evaluation of the questionnaire. In the first phase the questionnaire was developed using semi-structured interviews followed by content analysis. The psychometric evaluation of the questionnaire was performed examining the validity (face, content, and construct), and reliability (internal consistency and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and Standard Error of Measurement) in a sample of pharmacists practicing in community pharmacies in Tehran and Tabriz, Iran (n = 504). The construct validity of the questionnaire was determined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Scale‑Content Validity Index/Average (S‑CVI/AVE) was calculated at 0.84. The results of exploratory factor analysis supported 22 items in four factors including regulations and rules, professional communications, providing and supplying medicine, and consultation and providing pharmaceutical care that are explained by a total of 49.50% of the variance. Also, confirmatory factor analysis confirmed goodness of fit indices and model fit. Cronbach's alpha Coefficient was 0.919 and ICC was 0.914.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The psychometric evaluation of the present questionnaire shows a native, valid and reliable instrument to assess pharmacists' attitudes toward ethical challenges which could be a mirror of pharmacists ethical sensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10961,"journal":{"name":"Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"173-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624788/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40199-023-00472-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Knowledge advancement exposes the pharmacists to new ethical and professional challenges in providing pharmaceutical care. The pharmacist's attitude towards the ethical challenges of pharmacy practice could be of great help in assessing pharmacist's ethical sensitivity. This study aimed to design a valid and reliable questionnaire for measuring pharmacists' attitudes.

Methods: The present study is the second phase of a sequential exploratory mixed‑method study for designing and psychometric evaluation of the questionnaire. In the first phase the questionnaire was developed using semi-structured interviews followed by content analysis. The psychometric evaluation of the questionnaire was performed examining the validity (face, content, and construct), and reliability (internal consistency and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and Standard Error of Measurement) in a sample of pharmacists practicing in community pharmacies in Tehran and Tabriz, Iran (n = 504). The construct validity of the questionnaire was determined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.

Results: The Scale‑Content Validity Index/Average (S‑CVI/AVE) was calculated at 0.84. The results of exploratory factor analysis supported 22 items in four factors including regulations and rules, professional communications, providing and supplying medicine, and consultation and providing pharmaceutical care that are explained by a total of 49.50% of the variance. Also, confirmatory factor analysis confirmed goodness of fit indices and model fit. Cronbach's alpha Coefficient was 0.919 and ICC was 0.914.

Conclusions: The psychometric evaluation of the present questionnaire shows a native, valid and reliable instrument to assess pharmacists' attitudes toward ethical challenges which could be a mirror of pharmacists ethical sensitivity.

Abstract Image

药剂师对药学实践中道德挑战态度问卷的设计和心理测量评估:一项混合方法研究。
目的:知识进步使药剂师在提供药物护理方面面临新的道德和职业挑战。药剂师对药学实践中的伦理挑战的态度可能对评估药剂师的伦理敏感性有很大帮助。本研究旨在设计一份有效可靠的药剂师态度问卷。方法:本研究是问卷设计和心理测量评估的连续探索性混合方法研究的第二阶段。在第一阶段,问卷采用半结构化访谈,然后进行内容分析。问卷的心理测量评估是对德黑兰和大不里士社区药房执业药剂师样本的有效性(面孔、内容和结构)和可靠性(内部一致性、类内相关系数和测量标准误差)进行的(n = 504)。采用探索性和验证性因素分析法确定问卷的结构有效性。结果:量表内容有效性指数/平均值(S‑CVI/AVE)计算为0.84。探索性因素分析的结果支持了四个因素中的22个项目,包括法规和规则、专业沟通、提供和供应药物、咨询和提供药物护理,总方差为49.50%。验证性因素分析也证实了拟合优度指标和模型拟合。Cronbachα系数为0.919,ICC为0.914。结论:本问卷的心理测量评估显示,这是一种评估药剂师对道德挑战态度的本地、有效和可靠的工具,可以反映药剂师的道德敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信