Orofacial clefts: Reflections on prenatal diagnosis and family history based on a series of cases of a tertiary children hospital

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Tatiana Moreira, Margarida Dias, Madalena Von Hafe, Ana Rita Curval, Carla Ramalho, Ana Maria Maia, Carla Pinto Moura, Orofacial Cleft Team of University Hospital Center of São João, EPE
{"title":"Orofacial clefts: Reflections on prenatal diagnosis and family history based on a series of cases of a tertiary children hospital","authors":"Tatiana Moreira,&nbsp;Margarida Dias,&nbsp;Madalena Von Hafe,&nbsp;Ana Rita Curval,&nbsp;Carla Ramalho,&nbsp;Ana Maria Maia,&nbsp;Carla Pinto Moura,&nbsp;Orofacial Cleft Team of University Hospital Center of São João, EPE","doi":"10.1111/cga.12538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Prenatal diagnosis of orofacial clefts allows adequate counseling and planning for prenatal care and delivery. In 2001, two-dimensional ultrasound screening became universally used in Portugal by government guidelines, and after 2007 more advanced ultrasound became available. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of family history in patients with orofacial clefts and analyze prenatal diagnosis in patients born before 2001, between 2001 and 2007 and after 2007. Retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients with orofacial clefts followed by the trans-disciplinary team of a tertiary hospital. A total of 672 OFCs were identified: 40.9% isolated cleft palate, 38.1% cleft lip and palate, 19.7% cleft lip and 1.3% atypical cleft; 57.1% were male. The prevalence of family history was 26.0% of which 30.9% had a recognizable syndrome. Of those born before 2001, 13.7% had prenatal diagnosis; of those born between 2001 and 2007, 32.6% orofacial clefts were diagnosed in utero; and in children born after 2007, prenatal diagnosis increased to 47.1%. In our study, about one-fourth of children had a positive family history. Since the implementation of universal ultrasound screening in Portugal, more orofacial clefts were identified in utero (42.5% vs. 13.7%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) and after the availability of advanced ultrasound, prenatal diagnosis increased to 47.1% (vs. 20.4% before 2007; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Of all orofacial clefts diagnosed prenatally, ultrasound revealed more accuracy for the diagnosis of cleft lip and palate (65.4%) and cleft lip (24.8%). Cleft palate is the most difficult to detect in utero (9.3%). Prenatal ultrasound screening in Portugal has technically evolved with consequent better diagnostic accuracy for the identification of orofacial clefts, allowing better parenteral counseling.</p>","PeriodicalId":10626,"journal":{"name":"Congenital Anomalies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Congenital Anomalies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cga.12538","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prenatal diagnosis of orofacial clefts allows adequate counseling and planning for prenatal care and delivery. In 2001, two-dimensional ultrasound screening became universally used in Portugal by government guidelines, and after 2007 more advanced ultrasound became available. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of family history in patients with orofacial clefts and analyze prenatal diagnosis in patients born before 2001, between 2001 and 2007 and after 2007. Retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients with orofacial clefts followed by the trans-disciplinary team of a tertiary hospital. A total of 672 OFCs were identified: 40.9% isolated cleft palate, 38.1% cleft lip and palate, 19.7% cleft lip and 1.3% atypical cleft; 57.1% were male. The prevalence of family history was 26.0% of which 30.9% had a recognizable syndrome. Of those born before 2001, 13.7% had prenatal diagnosis; of those born between 2001 and 2007, 32.6% orofacial clefts were diagnosed in utero; and in children born after 2007, prenatal diagnosis increased to 47.1%. In our study, about one-fourth of children had a positive family history. Since the implementation of universal ultrasound screening in Portugal, more orofacial clefts were identified in utero (42.5% vs. 13.7%; p < 0.05) and after the availability of advanced ultrasound, prenatal diagnosis increased to 47.1% (vs. 20.4% before 2007; p < 0.05). Of all orofacial clefts diagnosed prenatally, ultrasound revealed more accuracy for the diagnosis of cleft lip and palate (65.4%) and cleft lip (24.8%). Cleft palate is the most difficult to detect in utero (9.3%). Prenatal ultrasound screening in Portugal has technically evolved with consequent better diagnostic accuracy for the identification of orofacial clefts, allowing better parenteral counseling.

基于某三级儿童医院系列病例的口面裂产前诊断及家族史的思考
产前诊断的口面裂允许充分的咨询和计划产前护理和分娩。2001年,二维超声筛查根据政府指导方针在葡萄牙得到普遍应用,2007年以后,更先进的超声检查成为可能。本研究旨在描述2001年以前、2001 - 2007年和2007年以后出生的口面腭裂患者的家族史,并分析其产前诊断。对某三级医院跨学科团队随访的一组口面部裂患者进行回顾性分析。其中,孤立性腭裂占40.9%,唇腭裂占38.1%,唇裂占19.7%,非典型腭裂占1.3%;57.1%为男性。家族史占26.0%,其中有可识别综合征的占30.9%。在2001年以前出生的人中,有13.7%进行了产前诊断;在2001年至2007年间出生的人中,32.6%的唇腭裂是在子宫内被诊断出来的;在2007年以后出生的儿童中,产前诊断率上升到47.1%。在我们的研究中,大约四分之一的孩子有阳性的家族史。自从在葡萄牙实施普遍超声筛查以来,子宫内发现的口面裂隙更多(42.5% vs. 13.7%;p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Congenital Anomalies
Congenital Anomalies PEDIATRICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Congenital Anomalies is the official English language journal of the Japanese Teratology Society, and publishes original articles in laboratory as well as clinical research in all areas of abnormal development and related fields, from all over the world. Although contributions by members of the teratology societies affiliated with The International Federation of Teratology Societies are given priority, contributions from non-members are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信