Characteristics of Long-Stay Patients in a PICU and Healthcare Resource Utilization After Discharge.

Critical Care Explorations Pub Date : 2023-08-25 eCollection Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000000971
Gerharda H Boerman, Heleen N Haspels, Matthijs de Hoog, Koen F Joosten
{"title":"Characteristics of Long-Stay Patients in a PICU and Healthcare Resource Utilization After Discharge.","authors":"Gerharda H Boerman, Heleen N Haspels, Matthijs de Hoog, Koen F Joosten","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the characteristics of long-stay patients (LSPs) admitted to a PICU and to investigate discharge characteristics of medical complexity among discharged LSP.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study where clinical data were collected on all children admitted to our PICU between July 1, 2017, and January 1, 2020.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A single-center study based at Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, a level III interdisciplinary PICU in The Netherlands, providing all pediatric and surgical subspecialties.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>LSP was defined as those admitted for at least 28 consecutive days.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Length of PICU stay, diagnosis at admission, length of mechanical ventilation, need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, mortality, discharge location after PICU and hospital admission, medical technical support, medication use, and involvement of allied healthcare professionals after hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>LSP represented a small proportion of total PICU patients (108 patients; 3.2%) but consumed 33% of the total admission days, 47% of all days on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and 38% of all days on mechanical ventilation. After discharge, most LSP could be classified as children with medical complexity (CMC) (76%); all patients received discharge medications (median 5.5; range 2-19), most patients suffered from a chronic disease (89%), leaving the hospital with one or more technological devices (82%) and required allied healthcare professional involvement after discharge (93%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LSP consumes a considerable amount of resources in the PICU and its impact extends beyond the point of PICU discharge since the majority are CMC. This indicates complex care needs at home, high family needs, and a high burden on the healthcare system across hospital borders.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 9","pages":"e0971"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d5/2e/cc9-5-e0971.PMC10461958.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the characteristics of long-stay patients (LSPs) admitted to a PICU and to investigate discharge characteristics of medical complexity among discharged LSP.

Design: We performed a retrospective cohort study where clinical data were collected on all children admitted to our PICU between July 1, 2017, and January 1, 2020.

Setting: A single-center study based at Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, a level III interdisciplinary PICU in The Netherlands, providing all pediatric and surgical subspecialties.

Patients: LSP was defined as those admitted for at least 28 consecutive days.

Interventions: None.

Measurements: Length of PICU stay, diagnosis at admission, length of mechanical ventilation, need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, mortality, discharge location after PICU and hospital admission, medical technical support, medication use, and involvement of allied healthcare professionals after hospital discharge.

Main results: LSP represented a small proportion of total PICU patients (108 patients; 3.2%) but consumed 33% of the total admission days, 47% of all days on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and 38% of all days on mechanical ventilation. After discharge, most LSP could be classified as children with medical complexity (CMC) (76%); all patients received discharge medications (median 5.5; range 2-19), most patients suffered from a chronic disease (89%), leaving the hospital with one or more technological devices (82%) and required allied healthcare professional involvement after discharge (93%).

Conclusions: LSP consumes a considerable amount of resources in the PICU and its impact extends beyond the point of PICU discharge since the majority are CMC. This indicates complex care needs at home, high family needs, and a high burden on the healthcare system across hospital borders.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

儿童重症监护室长期住院病人的特征与出院后医疗资源的利用。
目的研究入住儿童重症监护病房(PICU)的长期住院患者(LSPs)的特征,并调查出院的LSPs医疗复杂性的出院特征:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,收集了2017年7月1日至2020年1月1日期间入住我们PICU的所有儿童的临床数据:伊拉斯谟医学院索菲亚儿童医院是荷兰一家三级跨学科 PICU,提供所有儿科和外科亚专科:干预措施:无:干预措施:无:测量:PICU住院时间、入院诊断、机械通气时间、体外膜氧合需要、死亡率、PICU和入院后出院地点、医疗技术支持、药物使用以及出院后专职医疗人员的参与情况:LSP 在 PICU 患者总数中所占比例很小(108 人;3.2%),但却占入院总天数的 33%、体外膜氧合总天数的 47%、机械通气总天数的 38%。出院后,大多数 LSP 可被归类为医疗复杂性儿童(CMC)(76%);所有患者均接受出院药物治疗(中位数为 5.5;范围为 2-19),大多数患者患有慢性疾病(89%),出院时携带一种或多种技术设备(82%),出院后需要专职医疗人员的参与(93%):LSP 在重症监护病房消耗了大量资源,其影响超出了重症监护病房出院时的范围,因为大多数患者都是 CMC。这表明患者在家中有复杂的护理需求,家庭需求量大,对跨医院的医疗系统造成沉重负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信