A Comparative Analysis of Use of Google Glass versus. GoPro Intraoperative Video Recording of Scleral Buckle Surgery.

Rebecca R Soares, Melissa R Sieber, Katherine E Talcott, Allen Chiang, Sunir J Garg
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Use of Google Glass versus. GoPro Intraoperative Video Recording of Scleral Buckle Surgery.","authors":"Rebecca R Soares,&nbsp;Melissa R Sieber,&nbsp;Katherine E Talcott,&nbsp;Allen Chiang,&nbsp;Sunir J Garg","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1733931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Importance</b>  The scleral buckle technique is difficult to teach, given a decrease in the frequency of its use and the challenges of its video recording. <b>Background</b>  This study compares two different modalities for recording intraoperative videos of scleral buckle surgery. <b>Design</b>  Present study is a cross-sectional survey conducted in an academic hospital. <b>Participants</b>  A total of 36 medical students, ophthalmologic residents, and vitreoretinal surgery fellows participated in this survey. <b>Methods</b>  Five scleral buckle surgeries were filmed simultaneously using Google Glass and GoPro. Single-masked survey of trainees comparing video and audio quality of 38 10-second clips from each device, and listing the steps of scleral buckle surgery. Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. <b>Main Outcome Measures</b>  Trainees were asked for grading the video device with respect to audio and video quality as favorable or unfavorable. <b>Results</b>  GoPro clips had more favorable ratings of video (73.3%) and audio (75.9%), compared with Google Glass (36.7 and 58.5%, respectively; <i>p</i>  < 0.005). A total of 2.8% respondents listed the correct order of surgical steps in pretest, compared with 55.6% in posttest ( <i>p</i>  < 0.005). <b>Conclusion and Relevance</b>  Wearable recording devices can allow for video recording of scleral buckle surgery which has high utility in teaching trainees. GoPro and Google Glass each have distinct advantages.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"13 2","pages":"e124-e128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a6/36/10-1055-s-0041-1733931.PMC9928076.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1733931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance  The scleral buckle technique is difficult to teach, given a decrease in the frequency of its use and the challenges of its video recording. Background  This study compares two different modalities for recording intraoperative videos of scleral buckle surgery. Design  Present study is a cross-sectional survey conducted in an academic hospital. Participants  A total of 36 medical students, ophthalmologic residents, and vitreoretinal surgery fellows participated in this survey. Methods  Five scleral buckle surgeries were filmed simultaneously using Google Glass and GoPro. Single-masked survey of trainees comparing video and audio quality of 38 10-second clips from each device, and listing the steps of scleral buckle surgery. Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Main Outcome Measures  Trainees were asked for grading the video device with respect to audio and video quality as favorable or unfavorable. Results  GoPro clips had more favorable ratings of video (73.3%) and audio (75.9%), compared with Google Glass (36.7 and 58.5%, respectively; p  < 0.005). A total of 2.8% respondents listed the correct order of surgical steps in pretest, compared with 55.6% in posttest ( p  < 0.005). Conclusion and Relevance  Wearable recording devices can allow for video recording of scleral buckle surgery which has high utility in teaching trainees. GoPro and Google Glass each have distinct advantages.

使用谷歌眼镜与。巩膜扣手术GoPro术中录像。
巩膜扣技术是很难教的,由于其使用频率的减少和其视频记录的挑战。本研究比较了两种不同的方式记录术中巩膜扣手术的视频。本研究是在某学术医院进行的横断面调查。共36名医学生、眼科住院医师及玻璃体视网膜外科医师参与本调查。方法采用谷歌眼镜和GoPro同时拍摄5例巩膜扣手术。对受训者进行单蒙面调查,比较来自每个设备的38个10秒剪辑的视频和音频质量,并列出巩膜扣手术的步骤。获得了机构审查委员会的批准和知情同意。主要结果测量学员被要求对视频设备的音频和视频质量进行评分,分为有利或不利。结果GoPro的视频和音频评分分别为73.3%和75.9%,高于Google Glass(分别为36.7%和58.5%);结论与相关性可穿戴式记录设备可实现对巩膜扣手术过程的视频记录,在学员教学中具有较高的实用性。GoPro和谷歌眼镜各有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信