Efficacy and safety of a neurointerventional operation robotic assistance system in cerebral angiography.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
He Liu, Conghui Li, Shaohua Ren, Tong Li, Hongliang Zhong, Jianwen Jia, Hongchao Yang, Yi Qi, Junqiang Feng, Youxiang Li, Yang Wang
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of a neurointerventional operation robotic assistance system in cerebral angiography.","authors":"He Liu, Conghui Li, Shaohua Ren, Tong Li, Hongliang Zhong, Jianwen Jia, Hongchao Yang, Yi Qi, Junqiang Feng, Youxiang Li, Yang Wang","doi":"10.1136/svn-2022-002260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>At present, neurointerventional surgery requires angiographers to perform operations in the digital subtraction angiography (DSA) room. Ionising radiation and chronic joint damage are still unavoidable for angiographers. Therefore, we researched and developed a neurointerventional robot-assisted system, which is operated by angiographers in an operating room outside the DSA room. We have conducted a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a robot-assisted system in human cerebral angiography. In the future, this research will provide a platform for the research and development of an intelligent surgical system and bring revolutionary progress in neurointerventional surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From December 2020 to December 2021, 260 patients were enrolled from three medical centres, who were randomly and equally divided into a robot-assisted system group and a clinical routine cerebral angiography group. The success rate of angiography, the rate of the catheter reaching the target vessel, the operation time, X-ray radiation exposure and the incidence of related adverse events were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 257 patients completed this trial; baseline characteristics of the two groups did not differ significantly. The success rate of angiography in both the control group and the experimental group was 100%. The rate of the catheter reaching the target vessel was 99.23% and 100.00% in the control and experimental groups, respectively. For the control versus experimental groups, the angiographic operation time was 48.59±25.60 min versus 47.94±27.49 min, respectively; the X-ray radiation dose was 735.01±554.77 mGy versus 821.65±705.45 mGy, respectively; and the incidence of adverse events was 23.44% versus 22.48%, respectively. No statistical differences were present between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The robot-assisted surgical system is more convenient for cerebral angiography and is as safe and effective as the traditional cerebral angiography.</p>","PeriodicalId":22021,"journal":{"name":"Stroke and Vascular Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"243-251"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11221321/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke and Vascular Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2022-002260","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: At present, neurointerventional surgery requires angiographers to perform operations in the digital subtraction angiography (DSA) room. Ionising radiation and chronic joint damage are still unavoidable for angiographers. Therefore, we researched and developed a neurointerventional robot-assisted system, which is operated by angiographers in an operating room outside the DSA room. We have conducted a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a robot-assisted system in human cerebral angiography. In the future, this research will provide a platform for the research and development of an intelligent surgical system and bring revolutionary progress in neurointerventional surgery.

Methods: From December 2020 to December 2021, 260 patients were enrolled from three medical centres, who were randomly and equally divided into a robot-assisted system group and a clinical routine cerebral angiography group. The success rate of angiography, the rate of the catheter reaching the target vessel, the operation time, X-ray radiation exposure and the incidence of related adverse events were compared between the two groups.

Results: A total of 257 patients completed this trial; baseline characteristics of the two groups did not differ significantly. The success rate of angiography in both the control group and the experimental group was 100%. The rate of the catheter reaching the target vessel was 99.23% and 100.00% in the control and experimental groups, respectively. For the control versus experimental groups, the angiographic operation time was 48.59±25.60 min versus 47.94±27.49 min, respectively; the X-ray radiation dose was 735.01±554.77 mGy versus 821.65±705.45 mGy, respectively; and the incidence of adverse events was 23.44% versus 22.48%, respectively. No statistical differences were present between the two groups.

Conclusion: The robot-assisted surgical system is more convenient for cerebral angiography and is as safe and effective as the traditional cerebral angiography.

神经介入手术机器人辅助系统在脑血管造影术中的有效性和安全性。
背景:目前,神经介入手术需要血管造影师在数字减影血管造影室(DSA)内进行操作。对于血管技师来说,电离辐射和慢性关节损伤仍然不可避免。因此,我们研究并开发了一种神经介入机器人辅助系统,由血管技师在数字减影血管造影室外的手术室内操作。我们进行了一项前瞻性、多中心、随机对照试验,以评估机器人辅助系统在人类脑血管造影术中的安全性和有效性。未来,这项研究将为智能手术系统的研发提供一个平台,为神经介入手术带来革命性的进步:2020年12月至2021年12月,从三个医疗中心招募260名患者,随机平均分为机器人辅助系统组和临床常规脑血管造影组。比较两组患者的血管造影成功率、导管到达靶血管率、手术时间、X射线辐射量以及相关不良事件的发生率:共有 257 名患者完成了这项试验;两组患者的基线特征无明显差异。对照组和实验组的血管造影成功率均为 100%。对照组和实验组导管到达靶血管的成功率分别为 99.23% 和 100.00%。对照组和实验组的血管造影操作时间分别为(48.59±25.60)分钟和(47.94±27.49)分钟;X射线辐射剂量分别为(735.01±554.77)毫戈瑞和(821.65±705.45)毫戈瑞;不良反应发生率分别为23.44%和22.48%。两组间无统计学差异:结论:机器人辅助手术系统更便于脑血管造影,与传统脑血管造影一样安全有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stroke and Vascular Neurology
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Stroke and Vascular Neurology (SVN) is the official journal of the Chinese Stroke Association. Supported by a team of renowned Editors, and fully Open Access, the journal encourages debate on controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信